When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Confluence easier to use and set up. However, MadCap Flare is easier to administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with MadCap Flare overall.
I like a lot of the macros offered and make use of several of them (I think we also have a few extra ones). I also like how you can integrate portions of JIRA and Balsamiq, using the macros, this comes in handy with my spec pages.
Search is a pain. The more questions are asked in Q&A, the more difficult it becomes to find what you want, because it seems like questions are prioritized over stable doc pages. Search seems to default to "or" so searching for "product feature" will show...
Flare offers a great suite of tools, but what I find to be the most valuable is the ability to produce multiple outputs using the same content. The department that I work in uses Flare primarily to handle our paper-based manuals, but the ability to leverage...
Microsoft Team Foundation Server integration is extremely slow.
I like a lot of the macros offered and make use of several of them (I think we also have a few extra ones). I also like how you can integrate portions of JIRA and Balsamiq, using the macros, this comes in handy with my spec pages.
Flare offers a great suite of tools, but what I find to be the most valuable is the ability to produce multiple outputs using the same content. The department that I work in uses Flare primarily to handle our paper-based manuals, but the ability to leverage...
Search is a pain. The more questions are asked in Q&A, the more difficult it becomes to find what you want, because it seems like questions are prioritized over stable doc pages. Search seems to default to "or" so searching for "product feature" will show...
Microsoft Team Foundation Server integration is extremely slow.