Compare Flynn and Rancher 
- Users report that Flynn has a lower ease of use rating (7.0) compared to Rancher (8.9), indicating that Rancher may be more intuitive for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Flynn's quality of support is rated at 7.1, while Rancher offers a better support experience with a score of 8.2, suggesting that Rancher users may receive more effective assistance.
- G2 users highlight that Flynn's product direction is rated at only 4.2, which may indicate concerns about its future development, whereas Rancher boasts a strong score of 9.6, reflecting a positive outlook on its ongoing enhancements.
- Users on G2 note that Flynn's application deployment capabilities are less robust compared to Rancher, which excels in containerization with a score of 9.5, making it a preferred choice for users focused on modern application deployment.
- Reviewers say that Flynn's edge analytics score is 9.2, which is impressive, but Rancher outshines it with a higher overall performance and stability rating of 9.0, indicating a more reliable experience in production environments.
- Users report that Flynn's entry-level price of $9,999 per month is significantly higher than Rancher's offerings, making Rancher a more accessible option for small to medium-sized businesses looking for cost-effective solutions.
Immediate support around the clock from a team of dev-ops wizards. The team is immensely talented and will go out of their way to help beyond their responsibilities. We never have to worry about our infrastructure.
Since I have been using it since last year only, I didn't have many complaints, but if I had to pick one thing, I would say that it could improve its documentation and support. Sometimes I find it hard to find the information I need or get help from the...
1. kubernetes cluster deployment and maintenance are made easier with rancher. 🙠️ 2. its easy-to-use interface offers a centralised view of every cluster, making problem discovery quick. 🔎 3. tools for monitoring assist in being proactive and...
It proposes an imperative way of deploying applications using the Rancher customized helm charts. Some apps work with that way of deploying, others do not. Also, the official Rancher helm chart is always 2 major versions behind Kubernetes and if you want to...
Immediate support around the clock from a team of dev-ops wizards. The team is immensely talented and will go out of their way to help beyond their responsibilities. We never have to worry about our infrastructure.
1. kubernetes cluster deployment and maintenance are made easier with rancher. 🙠️ 2. its easy-to-use interface offers a centralised view of every cluster, making problem discovery quick. 🔎 3. tools for monitoring assist in being proactive and...
Since I have been using it since last year only, I didn't have many complaints, but if I had to pick one thing, I would say that it could improve its documentation and support. Sometimes I find it hard to find the information I need or get help from the...
It proposes an imperative way of deploying applications using the Rancher customized helm charts. Some apps work with that way of deploying, others do not. Also, the official Rancher helm chart is always 2 major versions behind Kubernetes and if you want to...
