Best Software for 2025 is now live!

Best Component Libraries Software

Adam Crivello
AC
Researched and written by Adam Crivello

Component libraries—sometimes referred to as UI components or UI libraries—provide developers with prebuilt sets of functions or components that can be added to, and modified in, mobile and web applications. These components facilitate a more efficient and effective development process, as developers can focus on the finer details of application creation and optimization instead of spending time building functionalities already designed by others.

Component libraries can cover a wide array of UI pieces, including buttons, charts, slides, and more. They can also be either open source or proprietary, with strong representation in both types. Typically, component libraries will focus on one specific language—e.g., Reach, Angular, HTML, or .NET—but may branch out to multiple.

To qualify for inclusion in the Component Libraries category, a product must:

Offer numerous application components as a library
Be compatible with one or more web or mobile application programming languages
Provide unlocked components (components that can be customized once taken from the library)
Connect with web frameworks and/or mobile development tools

Best Component Libraries Software At A Glance

Best for Small Businesses:
Best for Mid-Market:
Best for Enterprise:
Highest User Satisfaction:
Show LessShow More
Best for Enterprise:
Highest User Satisfaction:

G2 takes pride in showing unbiased reviews on user satisfaction in our ratings and reports. We do not allow paid placements in any of our ratings, rankings, or reports. Learn about our scoring methodologies.

No filters applied
158 Listings in Component Libraries Available
(578)4.5 out of 5
1st Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Free
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Syncfusion® Essential Studio® is a suite of 1,800+ software components and frameworks for developing web, mobile, and desktop applications. Its UI controls are designed to be flexible, optimized for

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Software Developer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 82% Small-Business
    • 13% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Syncfusion Essential Studio® Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    73
    Customer Support
    67
    Components
    64
    Features
    63
    Documentation
    41
    Cons
    Poor Documentation
    35
    Confusing Documentation
    26
    Documentation Issues
    18
    Update Issues
    15
    Learning Curve
    13
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Syncfusion Essential Studio® features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.6
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.1
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.8
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    2001
    HQ Location
    Morrisville, North Carolina
    Twitter
    @Syncfusion
    12,128 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1,993 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Syncfusion® Essential Studio® is a suite of 1,800+ software components and frameworks for developing web, mobile, and desktop applications. Its UI controls are designed to be flexible, optimized for

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Software Developer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 82% Small-Business
  • 13% Mid-Market
Syncfusion Essential Studio® Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
73
Customer Support
67
Components
64
Features
63
Documentation
41
Cons
Poor Documentation
35
Confusing Documentation
26
Documentation Issues
18
Update Issues
15
Learning Curve
13
Syncfusion Essential Studio® features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.6
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.1
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.8
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Company Website
Year Founded
2001
HQ Location
Morrisville, North Carolina
Twitter
@Syncfusion
12,128 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1,993 employees on LinkedIn®
(227)4.4 out of 5
Optimized for quick response
9th Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Starting at $899.00
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Kendo UI is a complete JavaScript UI toolkit that allows you to quickly build eye-catching, high-quality, high-performance responsive web-based apps integrated into your framework of choice (jQuery, A

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Software Developer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 36% Enterprise
    • 33% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Progress Kendo UI Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Controls
    10
    Features
    9
    Components
    8
    User Interface
    8
    Customer Support
    6
    Cons
    Poor Documentation
    4
    Confusing Documentation
    3
    Expensive
    3
    Performance Issues
    3
    Difficulty
    2
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Progress Kendo UI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.5
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.2
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.0
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    1981
    HQ Location
    Burlington, MA.
    Twitter
    @ProgressSW
    50,188 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    3,615 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Kendo UI is a complete JavaScript UI toolkit that allows you to quickly build eye-catching, high-quality, high-performance responsive web-based apps integrated into your framework of choice (jQuery, A

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Software Developer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 36% Enterprise
  • 33% Mid-Market
Progress Kendo UI Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Controls
10
Features
9
Components
8
User Interface
8
Customer Support
6
Cons
Poor Documentation
4
Confusing Documentation
3
Expensive
3
Performance Issues
3
Difficulty
2
Progress Kendo UI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.5
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.2
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.0
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Company Website
Year Founded
1981
HQ Location
Burlington, MA.
Twitter
@ProgressSW
50,188 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
3,615 employees on LinkedIn®

This is how G2 Deals can help you:

  • Easily shop for curated – and trusted – software
  • Own your own software buying journey
  • Discover exclusive deals on software
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Material is a design system backed by open-source code that helps teams build high-quality digital experiences

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 62% Small-Business
    • 23% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Material Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Components
    2
    Design Quality
    2
    User Interface
    2
    Affordable
    1
    Cross-Platform Compatibility
    1
    Cons
    Styling Issues
    2
    Complexity
    1
    Limited Features
    1
    Performance Issues
    1
    Poor UI Design
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Material features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    0.0
    No information available
    8.5
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.6
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    9.0
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Google
    Year Founded
    1998
    HQ Location
    Mountain View, CA
    Twitter
    @google
    32,520,271 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    301,875 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ:GOOG
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Material is a design system backed by open-source code that helps teams build high-quality digital experiences

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 62% Small-Business
  • 23% Mid-Market
Material Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Components
2
Design Quality
2
User Interface
2
Affordable
1
Cross-Platform Compatibility
1
Cons
Styling Issues
2
Complexity
1
Limited Features
1
Performance Issues
1
Poor UI Design
1
Material features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
0.0
No information available
8.5
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.6
Component Library
Average: 8.9
9.0
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Google
Year Founded
1998
HQ Location
Mountain View, CA
Twitter
@google
32,520,271 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
301,875 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ:GOOG
(112)4.8 out of 5
2nd Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    DevExpress engineers feature-complete Presentation Controls, IDE Productivity Tools, Business Application Frameworks, and Reporting / Dashboard Systems for Visual Studio, Delphi, HTML5 or iOS & An

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 69% Small-Business
    • 16% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • DevExpress Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Customer Support
    40
    Features
    24
    Ease of Use
    21
    Product Quality
    21
    Components
    17
    Cons
    Learning Curve
    11
    Missing Features
    9
    Difficulty
    8
    Learning Difficulty
    6
    Limited Features
    6
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • DevExpress features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    9.3
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    10.0
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    9.9
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    1998
    HQ Location
    Glendale, CA
    Twitter
    @DevExpress
    8,737 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    193 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

DevExpress engineers feature-complete Presentation Controls, IDE Productivity Tools, Business Application Frameworks, and Reporting / Dashboard Systems for Visual Studio, Delphi, HTML5 or iOS & An

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 69% Small-Business
  • 16% Mid-Market
DevExpress Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Customer Support
40
Features
24
Ease of Use
21
Product Quality
21
Components
17
Cons
Learning Curve
11
Missing Features
9
Difficulty
8
Learning Difficulty
6
Limited Features
6
DevExpress features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
9.3
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
10.0
Component Library
Average: 8.9
9.9
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Year Founded
1998
HQ Location
Glendale, CA
Twitter
@DevExpress
8,737 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
193 employees on LinkedIn®
(92)4.5 out of 5
5th Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Selenium is an umbrella project encapsulating a variety of tools and libraries enabling web browser automation. Selenium specifically provides infrastructure for the W3C WebDriver specification - a pl

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 47% Enterprise
    • 37% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Selenium WebDriver Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Language Support
    6
    Automation
    5
    Open Source
    5
    Browser Compatibility
    4
    Ease of Understanding
    4
    Cons
    Lack of Automation
    4
    Compatibility Issues
    3
    Integration Issues
    3
    Complexity
    2
    Performance Issues
    2
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Selenium WebDriver features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.7
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    8.8
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.5
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Selenium
    Year Founded
    2004
    HQ Location
    Chicago, IL
    Twitter
    @SeleniumHQ
    24,099 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    108 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Selenium is an umbrella project encapsulating a variety of tools and libraries enabling web browser automation. Selenium specifically provides infrastructure for the W3C WebDriver specification - a pl

Users
  • Software Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 47% Enterprise
  • 37% Mid-Market
Selenium WebDriver Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Language Support
6
Automation
5
Open Source
5
Browser Compatibility
4
Ease of Understanding
4
Cons
Lack of Automation
4
Compatibility Issues
3
Integration Issues
3
Complexity
2
Performance Issues
2
Selenium WebDriver features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.7
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
8.8
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.5
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Selenium
Year Founded
2004
HQ Location
Chicago, IL
Twitter
@SeleniumHQ
24,099 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
108 employees on LinkedIn®
(65)4.6 out of 5
View top Consulting Services for Flutter
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Flutter allows you to build beautiful native apps on iOS and Android from a single codebase.

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 72% Small-Business
    • 23% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Flutter Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Cross-Platform Compatibility
    6
    Ease of Use
    2
    Feature Rich
    2
    Language Support
    2
    Performance Efficiency
    2
    Cons
    Performance Issues
    4
    Library Size
    2
    Bug Issues
    1
    Compatibility Issues
    1
    Confusing Documentation
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Flutter features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.7
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    8.9
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    9.0
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Flutter
    Year Founded
    2017
    HQ Location
    Mountain View, US
    Twitter
    @flutter
    2,049 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    196 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Flutter allows you to build beautiful native apps on iOS and Android from a single codebase.

Users
  • Software Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 72% Small-Business
  • 23% Mid-Market
Flutter Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Cross-Platform Compatibility
6
Ease of Use
2
Feature Rich
2
Language Support
2
Performance Efficiency
2
Cons
Performance Issues
4
Library Size
2
Bug Issues
1
Compatibility Issues
1
Confusing Documentation
1
Flutter features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.7
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
8.9
Component Library
Average: 8.9
9.0
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Flutter
Year Founded
2017
HQ Location
Mountain View, US
Twitter
@flutter
2,049 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
196 employees on LinkedIn®
(64)4.7 out of 5
7th Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Free
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Appsmith is an open-source low-code application platform that simplifies custom application development for businesses, allowing them to streamline operations, automate processes, quickly integrate mu

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 66% Small-Business
    • 25% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Appsmith Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    56
    Time-saving
    25
    Features
    24
    Easy Integrations
    22
    User Interface
    22
    Cons
    Limited Features
    25
    Missing Features
    16
    Lack of Features
    15
    Poor UI Design
    12
    Poor User Interface
    10
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Appsmith features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.3
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    8.8
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    9.2
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Appsmith
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    2019
    HQ Location
    San Francisco, US
    Twitter
    @theappsmith
    3,478 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    in.linkedin.com
    94 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Appsmith is an open-source low-code application platform that simplifies custom application development for businesses, allowing them to streamline operations, automate processes, quickly integrate mu

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 66% Small-Business
  • 25% Mid-Market
Appsmith Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
56
Time-saving
25
Features
24
Easy Integrations
22
User Interface
22
Cons
Limited Features
25
Missing Features
16
Lack of Features
15
Poor UI Design
12
Poor User Interface
10
Appsmith features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.3
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
8.8
Component Library
Average: 8.9
9.2
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Appsmith
Company Website
Year Founded
2019
HQ Location
San Francisco, US
Twitter
@theappsmith
3,478 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
in.linkedin.com
94 employees on LinkedIn®
(96)4.5 out of 5
Optimized for quick response
10th Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Starting at $849.00
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    With Telerik and Kendo UI libraries, Progress equips .NET and JavaScript developers with a full arsenal of components, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and int

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Senior Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 45% Small-Business
    • 25% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Progress Telerik Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    6
    Components
    4
    Easy Integration
    4
    Customer Support
    3
    Easy Integrations
    3
    Cons
    Expensive
    2
    Missing Features
    2
    Change Adaptation
    1
    Compatibility Issues
    1
    Cost Issues
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Progress Telerik features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.9
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.7
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.2
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.6
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    1981
    HQ Location
    Burlington, MA.
    Twitter
    @ProgressSW
    50,188 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    3,615 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

With Telerik and Kendo UI libraries, Progress equips .NET and JavaScript developers with a full arsenal of components, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and int

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Senior Software Engineer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 45% Small-Business
  • 25% Enterprise
Progress Telerik Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
6
Components
4
Easy Integration
4
Customer Support
3
Easy Integrations
3
Cons
Expensive
2
Missing Features
2
Change Adaptation
1
Compatibility Issues
1
Cost Issues
1
Progress Telerik features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.7
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.2
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.6
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Company Website
Year Founded
1981
HQ Location
Burlington, MA.
Twitter
@ProgressSW
50,188 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
3,615 employees on LinkedIn®
(153)4.4 out of 5
4th Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Ionic is the leading mobile app development platform for web developers, powering over 15% of the world’s apps and used by hundreds of Fortune 1000 companies for consumer and internal facing apps. Io

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Senior Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 73% Small-Business
    • 18% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Ionic: An OutSystems Company Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    10
    Useful
    7
    Feature Rich
    5
    App Development
    4
    Cross-Platform Compatibility
    4
    Cons
    Performance Issues
    3
    Slow Performance
    3
    Bug Issues
    2
    Customization Difficulty
    2
    Dependency Issues
    2
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Ionic: An OutSystems Company features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.9
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    9.4
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.5
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    9.0
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Ionic
    Year Founded
    2012
    HQ Location
    Madison, WI
    Twitter
    @Ionicframework
    119,391 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    79 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Ionic is the leading mobile app development platform for web developers, powering over 15% of the world’s apps and used by hundreds of Fortune 1000 companies for consumer and internal facing apps. Io

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Senior Software Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 73% Small-Business
  • 18% Mid-Market
Ionic: An OutSystems Company Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
10
Useful
7
Feature Rich
5
App Development
4
Cross-Platform Compatibility
4
Cons
Performance Issues
3
Slow Performance
3
Bug Issues
2
Customization Difficulty
2
Dependency Issues
2
Ionic: An OutSystems Company features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
9.4
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.5
Component Library
Average: 8.9
9.0
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Ionic
Year Founded
2012
HQ Location
Madison, WI
Twitter
@Ionicframework
119,391 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
79 employees on LinkedIn®
(44)4.7 out of 5
3rd Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Free
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    DHTMLX delivers multifunctional JavaScript libraries and UI widgets for developing modern enterprise and B2B web applications of any scale from scratch. Using these out-of-the-box components, web deve

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 77% Small-Business
    • 20% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • DHTMLX UI Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Easy Integrations
    2
    Features
    2
    Automation
    1
    Components
    1
    Customer Support
    1
    Cons
    Expensive
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • DHTMLX UI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.9
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    9.4
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.5
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.9
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    DHTMLX
    Year Founded
    2005
    HQ Location
    Warsaw, PL
    Twitter
    @dhtmlx
    762 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    7 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

DHTMLX delivers multifunctional JavaScript libraries and UI widgets for developing modern enterprise and B2B web applications of any scale from scratch. Using these out-of-the-box components, web deve

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 77% Small-Business
  • 20% Mid-Market
DHTMLX UI Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Easy Integrations
2
Features
2
Automation
1
Components
1
Customer Support
1
Cons
Expensive
1
DHTMLX UI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
9.4
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.5
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.9
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
DHTMLX
Year Founded
2005
HQ Location
Warsaw, PL
Twitter
@dhtmlx
762 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
7 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. Finely tuned performance, because every millisecond counts. Fully tested across modern bro

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Senior Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 39% Mid-Market
    • 37% Small-Business
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Angular Material Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Components
    3
    Easy Integrations
    2
    Responsive Design
    2
    Controls
    1
    Customizability
    1
    Cons
    Customization Difficulty
    2
    Complex Installation
    1
    Complexity
    1
    Library Size
    1
    Limited Customization
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Angular Material features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.3
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.3
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    8.8
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.2
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2014
    HQ Location
    Melbourne, Vic
    Twitter
    @angular
    484,922 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    4 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. Finely tuned performance, because every millisecond counts. Fully tested across modern bro

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Senior Software Engineer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 39% Mid-Market
  • 37% Small-Business
Angular Material Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Components
3
Easy Integrations
2
Responsive Design
2
Controls
1
Customizability
1
Cons
Customization Difficulty
2
Complex Installation
1
Complexity
1
Library Size
1
Limited Customization
1
Angular Material features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.3
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
8.8
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.2
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Year Founded
2014
HQ Location
Melbourne, Vic
Twitter
@angular
484,922 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
4 employees on LinkedIn®
Entry Level Price:Free
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 47% Small-Business
    • 33% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Material UI Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Components
    9
    Customizability
    8
    UI Components
    8
    User Interface
    8
    Customization Options
    7
    Cons
    Customization Difficulty
    5
    Limited Customization
    4
    Integration Issues
    3
    Confusing Documentation
    2
    Learning Difficulty
    2
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Material UI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    10.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    7.9
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.4
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    7.8
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    MUI
    Year Founded
    2019
    HQ Location
    Paris, TF
    Twitter
    @MUI_hq
    19,041 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    50 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Users
  • Software Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 47% Small-Business
  • 33% Mid-Market
Material UI Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Components
9
Customizability
8
UI Components
8
User Interface
8
Customization Options
7
Cons
Customization Difficulty
5
Limited Customization
4
Integration Issues
3
Confusing Documentation
2
Learning Difficulty
2
Material UI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
10.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
7.9
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.4
Component Library
Average: 8.9
7.8
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
MUI
Year Founded
2019
HQ Location
Paris, TF
Twitter
@MUI_hq
19,041 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
50 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    pandas is an open source, BSD-licensed library providing high-performance, easy-to-use data structures and data analysis tools for the Python programming language.

    Users
    • Data Scientist
    • Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 39% Enterprise
    • 33% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • pandas python Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Data Management
    3
    Feature Rich
    2
    Features
    2
    Library Resources
    2
    Design Quality
    1
    Cons
    Performance Issues
    2
    Dependency Issues
    1
    Library Size
    1
    Understanding Difficulty
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • pandas python features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.5
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.2
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    8.5
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.1
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    HQ Location
    N/A
    Twitter
    @pypi
    21,331 Twitter followers
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

pandas is an open source, BSD-licensed library providing high-performance, easy-to-use data structures and data analysis tools for the Python programming language.

Users
  • Data Scientist
  • Software Engineer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 39% Enterprise
  • 33% Mid-Market
pandas python Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Data Management
3
Feature Rich
2
Features
2
Library Resources
2
Design Quality
1
Cons
Performance Issues
2
Dependency Issues
1
Library Size
1
Understanding Difficulty
1
pandas python features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.2
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
8.5
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.1
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
HQ Location
N/A
Twitter
@pypi
21,331 Twitter followers
(52)4.3 out of 5
8th Easiest To Use in Component Libraries software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Read more about our product here: https://www.qt.io/product Programming should be fast, easy and fun. That’s why we have been focusing on improving software development for the last 25 years, and wit

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 50% Small-Business
    • 31% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Qt features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    10.0
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.2
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.3
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Qt Group
    Year Founded
    1995
    HQ Location
    Espoo, Finland
    Twitter
    @qtproject
    22,172 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    22 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Read more about our product here: https://www.qt.io/product Programming should be fast, easy and fun. That’s why we have been focusing on improving software development for the last 25 years, and wit

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 50% Small-Business
  • 31% Mid-Market
Qt features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
10.0
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.2
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.3
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Qt Group
Year Founded
1995
HQ Location
Espoo, Finland
Twitter
@qtproject
22,172 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
22 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    websockets is a library for building WebSocket servers and clients in Python with a focus on correctness and simplicity.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 58% Small-Business
    • 33% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • python websocket Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    2
    Easy Integrations
    2
    Automation
    1
    Coding Efficiency
    1
    Cross-Platform Compatibility
    1
    Cons
    Bug Issues
    2
    Compatibility Issues
    1
    Confusing Documentation
    1
    Integration Issues
    1
    Learning Difficulty
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • python websocket features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    10.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.6
    8.7
    Language Contingency
    Average: 8.2
    9.0
    Component Library
    Average: 8.9
    8.3
    Unlocked Components
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    PyPI
    Year Founded
    2003
    HQ Location
    N/A
    Twitter
    @pypi
    21,331 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    2 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

websockets is a library for building WebSocket servers and clients in Python with a focus on correctness and simplicity.

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 58% Small-Business
  • 33% Enterprise
python websocket Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
2
Easy Integrations
2
Automation
1
Coding Efficiency
1
Cross-Platform Compatibility
1
Cons
Bug Issues
2
Compatibility Issues
1
Confusing Documentation
1
Integration Issues
1
Learning Difficulty
1
python websocket features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
10.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.6
8.7
Language Contingency
Average: 8.2
9.0
Component Library
Average: 8.9
8.3
Unlocked Components
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
PyPI
Year Founded
2003
HQ Location
N/A
Twitter
@pypi
21,331 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
2 employees on LinkedIn®

Learn More About Component Libraries Software

What is Component Libraries Software?

Component libraries grant developers access to sets of prewritten functions or components that serve as building blocks to aid software development. At their core, component libraries are supplemental to a full development process. Using components from the same library helps teams keep design philosophies consistent while empowering themselves to build software without being bogged down by smaller coding tasks. These components enable more efficient development, as developers are able to focus on the bulk of application creation and optimization instead of spending time building out smaller functionalities already designed by others. For example, if a developer wants to add buttons to their website, they use a component library to access and integrate prewritten code to implement those buttons rather than code them from scratch. Developers then customize those components with their own code to best suit their needs.

User interface (UI) component libraries specifically give teams access to prebuilt user interface elements, such as buttons and charts, which may be used when developing a website or an application. While this type of component library is perhaps most widely used, component libraries take many forms. They are composed of numerous components to handle a wide variety of functions or only a few components to handle a core feature set. Some libraries aid developers in specific development environments and contain components for database development, for example. Component libraries tend to focus on one language or framework, such as React or HTML, but many support multiple. All component libraries provide supporting documentation to describe each component and aid developers in navigating the library.

Key Benefits of Component Libraries Software

  • Solves niche coding problems
  • Saves development time
  • Aids consistent design philosophy

Why Use Component Libraries Software?

Component libraries are useful for solving smaller development problems while saving time. Both solo developers and development teams use component libraries in instances when coding a solution from scratch would take up unnecessary effort and resources. Rather than write a myriad of UI elements for a website, a developer simply accesses and customizes those elements via a component library. Using such libraries also helps ensure that design philosophies remain consistent.

Solve problems — Developers use component libraries to solve a host of smaller coding problems. When time is of the essence, component libraries provide prewritten functions which save developers from the brainstorming and problem-solving processes required to write such functions themselves.

Save time — Teams using component libraries to supplement development save time and effort. By leaning on prebuilt components for numerous small functions, developers can use more of their time and energy to focus on aspects of the development process with a larger scope, such as backend infrastructure.

Consistent design — Developers building websites or other external-facing applications must ensure that the design philosophy of each visual element is consistent. Component libraries help to maintain design consistency by providing a resource pool of like components.

Who Uses Component Libraries Software?

Virtually every kind of developer or development team makes use of component libraries to ease workloads. Many self-taught solo developers lean heavily on component libraries to fill in knowledge gaps or save effort. Teams of multiple developers also benefit from the use of component libraries’ prewritten functions to save time and maintain design consistency. Developers working on anything from web applications to database development make use of component libraries. Some key examples are listed below:

Solo developers — Developers working on their own often use component libraries to supplement their development projects. Component libraries come in handy for such developers because they are unable to lean on teammates for shared knowledge and task distribution. Solo developers using this software can implement prebuilt components that they might not have otherwise been able to craft themselves.

Development teams — While development teams inherently benefit from a shared knowledge pool and the ability to distribute tasks evenly, component libraries make workloads lighter by eliminating tedium. Teams rely on component libraries to provide a variety of prewritten functions, saving time and effort.

Web developers — Web developers use UI component libraries, which specifically provide prebuilt user interface elements that may be added to web and application development projects. Prewritten code for buttons, charts, slides, and more can be integrated with applications and customized rather than built from scratch.

Database developers — Database developers use database component libraries to make their jobs easier. Database component libraries give these developers prebuilt functions for accessing and manipulating data more easily, and for managing databases effectively.

Kinds of Component Libraries Software

Component libraries take many forms. UI component libraries are perhaps the most common, but any prewritten function for use by developers is considered a component. This means that one component library might provide access to a few components for data analysis, while another might provide a full suite of components useful throughout the application development process. From component libraries containing components for imaging to libraries with components for performing scientific computing with a specific programming language like Python, there are hundreds of kinds of component libraries available in the market.

Component Libraries Software Features

Component libraries’ features depend on the components available within them. For example, a UI component library’s features might include drag and drop integration for UI elements. Below are some of the common features across libraries.

Unlocked components — The components provided by component libraries are fully customizable by developers. Developers and development teams enjoy the time-saving benefits of using prebuilt components without sacrificing flexibility when needed. This functionality helps UI developers craft consistent user-facing screens and pages that also maintain branding.

Framework integration — Many component libraries connect or integrate with existing development frameworks to make access and use easier for developers. By minimizing the amount of navigation required to use components, component libraries help developers save effort and maintain a smooth workflow.

Repository management — Most component libraries offer features by which developers sort and group components within a repository. Organization can be achieved via predefined or custom rules (e.g., sorting by function or complexity).

Documentation — Component libraries provide documentation describing the functions contained within them and how developers use them effectively. Good documentation serves as an index of sorts by which developers easily browse and grasp the functionality of each component. This documentation is crucial for making components clear to developers.

Additional Component Libraries Software Features

Support — Some component libraries go beyond documentation to offer support when developers need further help integrating components with their applications. This support takes the form of live chat or forums by which developers pose clarifying questions to better understand the tools they are accessing.

Codeless interface — Some UI component libraries allow teams to assemble UI elements without coding via a codeless interface. This interface typically takes the form of drag and drop interaction and makes UI assembly smooth in situations where code-level customization are not necessary.

Potential Issues with Component Libraries Software

Poor documentation — Good documentation is crucial for developers accessing and interacting with component libraries. Parsing through lines of code to grasp functionality is daunting, and a component library with good documentation makes understanding component functions accessible and easy. If a component library has poor or missing documentation, the effort required to understand the components within negates the potential benefits of using them.

Component effectiveness — A component library with the right set of components makes developers’ lives far easier by providing prebuilt building blocks for applications, saving time and effort that would go into coding such elements from scratch. However, if the components within a component library are too basic, the developers’ efforts to customize and build upon them ultimately results in a workload comparable to writing everything from scratch.