When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Axosoft easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Axosoft overall.
Axosoft's Bug Tracker allows for exactly the kind of customization we need. We migrated from Plan.io and I initially tried to mirror that environment. Later, I realized that Axosoft can do even more and just ran with it. Also, we're just a small startup on...
Axosoft is rather difficult to use, outside of its very basics. If one chooses to simply focus on the tickets that have been assigned to them and do those, then Axosoft is very straightforward (however, a lot of tools can accomplish this)! However, one...
Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...
It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.
Axosoft's Bug Tracker allows for exactly the kind of customization we need. We migrated from Plan.io and I initially tried to mirror that environment. Later, I realized that Axosoft can do even more and just ran with it. Also, we're just a small startup on...
Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...
Axosoft is rather difficult to use, outside of its very basics. If one chooses to simply focus on the tickets that have been assigned to them and do those, then Axosoft is very straightforward (however, a lot of tools can accomplish this)! However, one...
It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.