Compare AMS360 and QQCatalyst 
- Users report that QQCatalyst excels in Contact Management with a score of 8.7, while AMS360 trails behind at 8.2. Reviewers mention that QQCatalyst's intuitive interface makes it easier to manage client relationships effectively.
- Reviewers say that AMS360 offers superior Accounting features, scoring 7.4 compared to QQCatalyst's 6.8. Users on G2 highlight AMS360's robust financial reporting capabilities as a significant advantage for small businesses.
- Users say that both products score equally in Policy Management at 8.8, but reviewers mention that QQCatalyst provides a more user-friendly experience when navigating policy details, making it easier for agents to access necessary information quickly.
- G2 users report that QQCatalyst shines in Task Management with a score of 8.3, while AMS360 scores slightly lower at 8.1. Reviewers mention that QQCatalyst's task assignment and tracking features help teams stay organized and efficient.
- Users on G2 highlight that AMS360 has a better Claims Management system, scoring 7.6 compared to QQCatalyst's 6.8. Reviewers mention that AMS360's streamlined claims process reduces the time spent on administrative tasks.
- Reviewers mention that QQCatalyst's Reporting & Dashboards feature, scoring 8.2, is more customizable than AMS360's 7.4, allowing users to create tailored reports that meet their specific business needs.
Very user friendly and good for the work I do, especially from claims point of view.
For Accounting use, AMS does not have the detailed functionality to provide cash on account reporting that can associate income received with statement reconciliations. Not having this feature requires offline tracking which creates a greater risk for...
It includes all the functions that I expect.
I always struggle logging in in the morning. Sometimes the system has me enter my email and password close to five times before it will accept that I am not a robot and let me into my account. One of my work associates also has this problem, while my other...
Very user friendly and good for the work I do, especially from claims point of view.
It includes all the functions that I expect.
For Accounting use, AMS does not have the detailed functionality to provide cash on account reporting that can associate income received with statement reconciliations. Not having this feature requires offline tracking which creates a greater risk for...
I always struggle logging in in the morning. Sometimes the system has me enter my email and password close to five times before it will accept that I am not a robot and let me into my account. One of my work associates also has this problem, while my other...
