G2 takes pride in showing unbiased reviews on user satisfaction in our ratings and reports. We do not allow paid placements in any of our ratings, rankings, or reports. Learn about our scoring methodologies.
IBM MQ connects applications and microservices in private datacenters, across hybrid or multi-cloud environments, and at the edge of the enterprise. It allows businesses, from large enterprises to sta
MuleSoft enables businesses to transform into customer-first companies by enabling a single customer view across hundreds of systems and touchpoints using one unified platform. With MuleSoft, organiza
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is a tool for MuleSoft that serves as the Control Plane and Runtime Plane for MuleSoft APIs, allowing deployment and management of CloudHub APIs and addition of policies through the API Manager. Reviewers frequently mention the platform's API-led connectivity approach, reusable components, clear view of all the APIs and data flows, and the ability to read AI-driven recommendations for data transformations, all of which speed up project delivery and reduce development time. Users reported concerns with the licensing and overall cost of ownership, the vCore-based pricing structure making scaling difficult and costly, a steep learning curve for new developers, and some performance issues.
HiveMQ is the Industrial Data Platform helping enterprises move from connected devices to intelligent operations. Built on the MQTT standard and a distributed edge-to-cloud architecture, HiveMQ connec
Ingest event streams from anywhere, at any scale, for simple, reliable, real-time stream analytics
Hookdeck is a fast and reliable event gateway for receiving, processing, and delivering asynchronous messages. It centralizes and streamlines communication between services – external providers (e.g.
Real-time data is fundamental to the digital business that must operate at unprecedented speeds and agility, demanding a messaging system with high performance, throughput, and availability to ensure
Apache Kafka is an open-source distributed event streaming platform developed by the Apache Software Foundation. It is designed to handle real-time data feeds with high throughput and low latency, mak
meshIQ is the enterprise evolution platform purpose-built to transform how organizations manage and optimize their middleware—the digital nervous system of the enterprise. It provides unified visibili
RabbitMQ is the most popular open source message broker, with more than 35,000 production deployments world-wide. RabbitMQ is lightweight and easy to deploy on premises and in the cloud and runs on al
Ably helps teams deliver resilient AI UX and high-performance live experiences that stay fast and in sync worldwide. We provide the global realtime layer for AI agents, chat, notifications, live dashb
Lobster is a next-generation data integration ecosystem designed for both business and IT teams to simplify system integration, process automation, and data collaboration across internal and external
Lobster_data is a data integration tool that allows users to work with various types of data and build their business around it. Reviewers appreciate the wide range of features and functions offered by Lobster_data, its ease of use, and the effective customer support that helps resolve issues quickly. Users experienced some limitations with the product, such as the inability to fully customize the web interface, high subscription price, slow consulting response, and difficulties with version upgrades and understanding its full capabilities.
Azure Logic Apps is a cloud-based integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that enables organizations to automate and orchestrate workflows, integrating applications, data, systems, and services acro
Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud.
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is a set of capabilities to speed integration and scale automation, built for any hybrid cloud, within a single, unified experience. Unlock business data and assets as AP
To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat AMQ—based on open source communities like Apache Active
Message queue software is an asynchronous communication middleware that connects applications. Traditional monolithic software is built to communicate with itself or a few other applications. When the software sends or receives data from another software, this data is called a message. It is difficult to send and receive data to another app due to different operating systems, network protocols, and programming languages. Message queue software solves these problems by handling messages for applications from different environments. It creates a new high availability, high reliability, high throughput, and low latency environment to send and receive messages from one application to another.
As the name suggests, MQ software lines up different messages by “queue” and processes each message through standardized methods. This helps companies to develop high-performance cloud services and apps such as microservices that can communicate with other applications and operating systems without worrying about compatibility issues.
In the early years, big companies invested heavily in proprietary software and middleware that could connect their products with each other. Using the same IT stacks and standards, these companies can create connected applications. With the vast network of applications connected by middleware, users can solve various complex problems that require multiple inputs and outputs from different environments.
However, only big companies with big budgets can afford to develop this approach. For most companies and non-business users who use different network standards, programming languages, and data structures, connected applications seem to be unobtainable. This is why there are many business issues that seem to be easy to solve but are technically challenging to implement. For example, hospitals and insurance companies can’t share patient data automatically because their applications aren’t compatible in communicating with each other. Those who managed to set up the connectivity may still use proprietary protocols such as raw UDP, TCP, and HTTP, which are hard to scale and integrate with other applications.
To solve this issue, early open-source organizations build open source message brokers specific to a language environment like Java and Python. Later big companies began building their own messaging system for others, such as AWS and IBM MQ, to create enterprise messaging platforms that run on their own IT systems. Software buyers can select the best message queue web services or on-premises software to connect various assets such as big data servers to the internet of things (IoT).
What Does MQ Stand For?
MQ stands for Message Queue. A “message” is data that transfers from one party to another. A “queue” is how that message is transferred and processed from one party to another.
The following are some core features within Message Queue Software that can help users ensure high availability of message queuing services:
Message query: MQ allows applications to query messages by ID, topics, keys, and contents. This enables the user to organize messages based on custom rules.
Message tracing: MQ can trace routing information from the producer of the message to the consumer. This allows users to analyze metadata on the message producer and consumer for network performance issues.
Dead-letter queue: MQ supports dead-letter queues (DLQ) to save messages that can’t be processed for debugging to determine why the queueing process failed.
Message blocklist and allowlist: MQ supports account-based blocklist and allowlist policies to authorize or unauthorize messages from internal and external parties.
Multiple message processes: Message queue processes can be created for different models. In a peer-to-peer model, a producer sends one message to one consumer. In a pub/sub model, producers can send group messages to consumers with the same cluster ID. In RPC (request/reply) model, MQ can load balance messages back and forth between producer and consumer.
Dashboard: A user-friendly dashboard can visualize comprehensive and multidimensional metrics of message product and consumption based on clusters, topics, instances, and groups. This will spot trends for server resource allocation and security improvement.
Monitoring and alerting: Messaging activities can be monitored in real time, and alerts can be sent to notify the IT and data team to resolve issues in a timely manner.
Decoupling: Message queue tools decouple (separate) applications and message services. This simplifies CI/CD development so developers can design and update core components without worrying about the message components.
Load shifting: Messages can automatically be queued according to their size, frequency, and quantity. When there is a large number of message requests, servers can fail to process this amount of volume. It will either crash or indiscriminately reject all incoming messages. Without load shifting, message disruption will halt online business operations and negatively affect revenue.
Scalability: MQ servers can be integrated with other applications and be allocated an appropriate amount of resources based on needs. This saves users time from manually changing the message process during disruptions or software upgrades.
IT teams: IT teams can use MQ software to customize how the data can flow from the application to the user. They can process data from other applications and microservices in an asynchronous method instead of relying on synchronous protocol methods such as REST API.
Software solutions can come with their own set of challenges.
Poor MQ practice: MQ policies may slow down message processing speed due to incorrect models. The system might automatically blame the issue on the message senders and blocklist them. MQ users should identify common messages and plan ahead on how to process different types of messages beforehand. It is best to test through multiple message queue processes based on the expected load to avoid bandwidth issues.
Ease of use: Message queue can bring additional challenges without the right talent. To set up the correct message queue process, an IT team has to go through different scenarios with different types of network connections and message processing rules, which would result in adding additional layers and slowing down the loading speed. Companies should ensure they invest in additional talent to maintain the MQ process and software.
As good as it sounds, message queue software may not be suitable for every use case. MQ software is typically designed to handle a permanent and ongoing messaging process that requires fast processing speed and zero-lost-message tolerance when losing a message can significantly impact the operation. Simple or temporal message processing may not need MQ software, which adds unnecessary costs and time.
Users should have a specific use case in mind before considering buying an MQ software. Financial firms or hospitals that transfer sensitive, timely, critical messages might need a high availability MQ server to process the messages. Different use cases require different MQ models and features. Since not all requirements have the same importance, buyers should assign them priorities and focus on the most important ones. Buyers need to differentiate must-have features from nice-to-have features from their business case.
Create a long list
Buyers should start with a large pool of MQ software vendors. Keeping the desired must-have features in mind, buyers must perform consistent inquiries during demos by which they can effectively compare the pros and cons of each software.
Create a short list
It helps cross reference the results of initial vendor evaluations with G2 reviews from other buyers, which will help narrow in on a short three to five product list. From there, buyers can compare pricing and features to determine the best fit.
Conduct demos
As a rule of thumb, companies should make sure to demo all of the products that end up on their short list. During demos, buyers should ask specific questions related to the functionalities they care about most. For example, one might ask to be walked through a typical performance issue from alerting to remediation within the tool.
Choose a selection team
Regardless of a company’s size, it’s essential to involve the most relevant personas when beginning the software selection process. Larger companies may include individual team members from development teams, testing teams, data teams, and other IT professionals working with the software closely. Smaller companies with fewer employees might overlap roles.
Negotiation
Many companies offer full monitoring platforms that go beyond MQ to include network monitoring, infrastructure monitoring, and more. While some companies will not budge on the configurations of their packages, buyers looking to trim costs should try to negotiate down to the specific functions that matter to them to get the best price. For example, a vendor’s pricing page for MQ functionality might only be included with a robust all-in-one monitoring package, whereas a sales conversation may prove otherwise.
Final decision
After this stage, performing a trial run with a small selection of IT professionals or developers is important. This will help ensure that the MQ software of choice integrates well with an IT administrator’s systems setup or a developer’s day-to-day work. If the software is well-liked and well utilized, the buyer can take that as a sign that their selection is the right one. If not, a reevaluation of the options may be required.