Digital Asset Management Software

 
for Digital Asset Management
G2 watermark
Grid℠ Scoring
Contenders
Leaders
High Performers
Niche
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market Presence
Satisfaction
Sort by:
 

Digital Asset Management Software Definition

Digital asset management (DAM) software catalogues and maintains repositories of media files such as photos, audio files, and video files. By applying metadata taxonomies to assets, users are able to group, search, and distribute files. DAM solutions often come with other features such as powerful import and export functionality, versioning, preview and thumbnail views of assets optimized for processing speed, and automatic conversion of files to different file types or file sizes. DAM systems are often implemented by marketing and operations teams across various industries for help in defining and managing their online brands. These products can also be used to reduce the duplication of an organization’s assets, maintain up-to-date collections, and control security of assets with role-based permissions. Some businesses assign specific individuals as DAM administrators or “librarians” to oversee these assets and ensure they follow established brand-specific guidelines. Many DAM products integrate with other management software like those in our Enterprise Content Management category and Web Content Management category, as well as with various other creative software including website builders and content marketing tools.

To qualify for inclusion in the Digital Asset Management category, a product must:

  • Provide storage for company-wide rich media files, such as photos, sound files, and videos, as well as presentations and graphics, specifically related to company branding
  • Allow users to tag assets and search for and access files as needed
  • Offer tools for managing rights and permissions of media content for external use and embedding on internal or external websites

Digital Asset Management Grid℠ Description

Products shown on the Grid℠ for Digital Asset Management have received a minimum of 10 reviews/ratings in data gathered by February 13, 2017. Products are ranked by customer satisfaction (based on user reviews) and market presence (based on market share, vendor size, and social impact) and placed into four categories on the Grid℠:

Report Summary

The Spring 2017 Digital Asset Management℠ Report revealed these high-level insights about the digital asset management market as a whole:

  • A Pleasure Doing Business – Users gave Ease of Doing Business the highest average satisfaction rating at 89%. This percentage is consistent with the Winter 2017 Grid℠ for Digital Asset Management score, indicating satisfaction with this metric is steady.
  • Few New Friends – Of the 30 products on this Grid℠, only one is appearing for the first time. All other products are repeats from previous reports. Only one product, Widen Collective, jumped from the Winter High Performer quadrant into the Spring Leader quadrant. This market is tight and products must continually work to maintain or improve their performance in this category.
  • Integrations vs. Images – While image file management remains the highest-rated feature at 94% average, integrations with creative software remains the lowest-rated feature at 82% average. Users seem pleased at their tool’s ability to handle digital media internally, but would like to see improvement in the way it cooperates with other software.

New Products on Grid℠

iNEWS is appearing on the Digital Asset Management Grid℠ for the first time.

Products Not Yet on Grid℠

Products with fewer than 10 reviews are not included on the Grid℠. Some notable products not yet included are MediaBeacon R3volution, Image Relay, and globaledit. Users of these products are encouraged to visit the Digital Asset Management category and write a review.





 

Grid℠ Scores for Digital Asset Management

 
The table below shows the Satisfaction and Market Presence scores that determine vendor placement on the Grid℠. To learn more about each of the products, please see the executive profile section.

Leaders

# of ReviewsSatisfaction (normalized)Market PresenceG2 Score
Widen Collective
150
97
50
73
Wiredrive
223
92
49
70
Webdam a Shutterstock Company
75
68
53
60

High Performers

# of ReviewsSatisfaction (normalized)Market PresenceG2 Score
Brandfolder
114
97
45
71
Libris
83
94
49
71
IntelligenceBank DAM
67
96
39
67
Daminion
81
90
39
64
Flight by Canto
68
76
44
60
Cumulus
79
74
47
60
Extensis Portfolio
51
73
47
60
MediaValet
32
79
37
58
Bynder
26
73
41
57
Smartimage
29
78
35
56
MerlinOne
15
79
28
53
Asset Bank
29
73
30
51
Brandworkz
16
68
33
50
iNEWS
13
54
43
48

Contenders

# of ReviewsSatisfaction (normalized)Market PresenceG2 Score
CONTENTdm
23
41
54
47
Documentum
28
8
81
44
OpenText MediaBin
15
14
70
42
assetSERV
11
12
62
37

Niche

# of ReviewsSatisfaction (normalized)Market PresenceG2 Score
Percolate
17
35
45
40
censhare Digital Experience Platform
16
37
36
36
ResourceSpace
13
40
28
34
Nuxeo
17
28
37
32
NetX
10
32
30
31
CELUM
14
30
31
30
Xinet
13
17
29
23
WoodWing Elvis DAM
15
30
35
32
MediaBank
11
5
24
14


 

Grid℠ Methodology

 

Grid℠ Rating Methodology

The Grid℠ represents the democratic voice of real software users, rather than the subjective opinion of one analyst. G2 Crowd rates digital asset management products algorithmically based on data sourced from product reviews shared by G2 Crowd users and data aggregated from online sources and social networks.

Technology buyers can use the Grid℠ to help them quickly select the best digital asset management products for their businesses and to find peers with similar experiences. For vendors, media, investors, and analysts, the Grid℠ provides benchmarks for product comparison and market trend analysis.

Grid℠ Scoring Methodology

G2 Crowd rates products and vendors based on reviews gathered from our user community, as well as data aggregated from online sources and social networks. We apply a unique, patent-pending algorithm to this data to calculate the product strength and scores in real time. The Spring 2017 Digital Asset Management Grid℠ Report is based off of scores calculated using the G2 Crowd algorithm v2.0 from reviews collected through February 13, 2017. To view the Digital Asset Management Grid℠ with the most recent data, please visit the Digital Asset Management page.

The Satisfaction rating is affected by the following (in order of importance):

  • Customer satisfaction with end user-focused product attributes based on user reviews
  • Popularity and statistical significance based on the number of reviews received by G2 Crowd
  • Quality of reviews received (reviews that are more thoroughly completed will be weighted more heavily)
  • Age of reviews (more-recent reviews provide relevant and up-to-date information that is reflective of the current state of a product)
  • Customers' satisfaction with administration-specific product attributes based on user reviews
  • Overall customer satisfaction and Net Promoter Score® (NPS) based on ratings by G2 Crowd users

The Market Presence score is affected by the following (in order of importance):

  • Product market presence
    • Number of employees for product (based on social networks and public sources)
    • Number of product reviews
    • Product social impact based on factors including Twitter followers and domain authority
  • Vendor market presence
    • Number of employees for parent company (based on social networks and public resources)
    • Vendor momentum based on web traffic and search trends
    • Vendor social impact based on Klout score and Twitter followers
    • Age of company (number of years in operation)
    • Employee satisfaction and engagement (based on social network ratings)

Grid℠ Categorization Methodology

Making G2 Crowd research relevant and easy for people to use as they evaluate and select business software products is one of our most important goals. In support of that goal, organizing products and software companies in a well-defined structure that makes capturing, evaluating, and displaying reviews and other research in an orderly manner is a critical part of the research process.

To manage the process of categorizing the software products and the related reviews in the G2 community, G2 Crowd follows a publicly available categorization methodology. All digital asset management products appearing on the Grid℠ have passed through G2 Crowd's categorization methodology and meet G2 Crowd's category standards.

Many terms that appear regularly across G2 Crowd and are used to aid in product categorization warrant a definition to facilitate buyer understanding. These terms may be included within reviews from the G2 community or in executive summaries for products included on the Grid℠. A list of standard definitions is available to G2 Crowd users to eliminate confusion and ease the buying process.

Rating Changes and Dynamics

The ratings in this report are based on a snapshot of the user reviews and social data collected by G2 Crowd up through February 13, 2017. The ratings may change as the products are further developed, the vendors grow, and as additional opinions are shared by users. G2 Crowd updates the ratings on its website in real time as additional data is received, and this report will be updated as significant data is received. By improving their products and support and/or by having more satisfied customer voices heard, Contenders may become Leaders and Niche vendors may become High Performers.

Trust

Keeping our ratings unbiased is our top priority. We require the use of a LinkedIn account to validate a G2 Crowd user’s identity and employer. Additionally, we verify all reviews manually. We do not allow users to rate their employers’ products or those of their employers’ competitors. Though we share reviews from business partners (they often contain valuable content), we filter out business partner ratings in our aggregate ratings to avoid bias.

Our G2 Crowd staff does not add any subjective input to the ratings, which are determined algorithmically based on data aggregated from publicly available online sources and social networks. Vendors cannot influence their ratings by spending time or money with us. Only the opinion of real users and data from public sources factor into the ratings.

Grid℠ Inclusion Criteria

All products in a G2 Crowd category that have at least 10 reviews from real users of the product are included on the Grid℠. Inviting other users, such as colleagues and peers, to join G2 Crowd and share authentic product reviews will accelerate this process.

If a digital asset management product is not yet listed on G2 Crowd and it fits the market definition above, then users are encouraged to suggest its addition to our Digital Asset Management category.

Product Profiles

Product profiles and detailed charts are included for products with 10 or more reviews.
 

*Net Promoter, Net Promoter System, Net Promoter Score, NPS and the NPS-related emoticons are registered trademarks of Bain & Company, Inc., Fred Reichheld and Satmetrix Systems, Inc.



 
Widen Collective
Widen Collective
150 ratings
4.7 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Widen
  • Location: Madison, WI
  • Founded: 1948
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 103
  • Website: www.widen.com

Product Synopsis

 

Widen Collective has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. Widen received the highest Satisfaction score among Digital Asset Management products. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 97% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Widen at a rate of 94%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
97%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
92%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
91%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
89%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
97%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
85%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
98%
Average 94%
Audio
94%
Average 89%
File Types
94%
Average 89%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Integration with Marketing Software
81%
Average 86%
Organizational Interface
87%
Average 83%
Integration with Creative Software
88%
Average 82%
 
Wiredrive
Wiredrive
223 ratings
4.3 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Wiredrive
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA
  • Founded: 2000
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 39
  • Website: wiredrive.com

Product Synopsis

 

Wiredrive has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 92% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 80% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Wiredrive at a rate of 86%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
88%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
87%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
87%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
87%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
92%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
88%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Video
94%
Average 86%
Audio
93%
Average 89%
Images
93%
Average 94%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Integration with Creative Software
79%
Average 82%
Watermark
80%
Average 85%
Search
81%
Average 84%
 
Webdam a Shutterstock Company
Webdam a Shutterstock Company
75 ratings
4.1 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Shutterstock (NYSE: SSTK)
  • Location: New York, NY
  • Founded: 2003
  • 2015 Revenue: $425.1 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 1.93k
  • Website: www.shutterstock.com

Product Synopsis

 

Webdam a Shutterstock Company has been named a Leader based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 84% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 85% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Webdam at a rate of 82%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
86%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
83%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
84%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
83%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
87%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
81%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
93%
Average 94%
File Types
89%
Average 89%
Metadata
89%
Average 90%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Integration with Creative Software
76%
Average 82%
Performance and Reliability
78%
Average 85%
Search
80%
Average 84%
 
Brandfolder
Brandfolder
114 ratings
4.6 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Brandfolder
  • Location: Denver, CO
  • Founded: 2012
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 22
  • Website: brandfolder.com

Product Synopsis

 

Brandfolder has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 98% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 97% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Brandfolder at a rate of 93%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
96%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
95%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
91%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
95%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
97%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
94%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
97%
Average 94%
User, Role, and Access Management
97%
Average 91%
Web Interface
97%
Average 89%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Integration with Marketing Software
81%
Average 86%
Integration with Creative Software
84%
Average 82%
Versioning
88%
Average 84%
 
Libris
Libris
83 ratings
4.6 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: PhotoShelter
  • Location: New York, NY
  • Founded: 2005
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 99
  • Website: www.photoshelter.com

Product Synopsis

 

Libris has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 98% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Libris at a rate of 92%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
96%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
91%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
90%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
91%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
97%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
90%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
98%
Average 94%
Integration with Marketing Software
96%
Average 86%
Expiration
95%
Average 88%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
File Preview
87%
Average 84%
Search
87%
Average 84%
User, Role, and Access Management
87%
Average 87%
 
IntelligenceBank DAM
IntelligenceBank DAM
67 ratings
4.9 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: IntelligenceBank
  • Location: Southbank, Australia
  • Founded: 2009
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 29
  • Website: www.intelligencebank.com

Product Synopsis

 

IntelligenceBank DAM has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 97% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend IntelligenceBank at a rate of 99%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
100%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
97%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
97%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
95%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
98%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
95%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Watermark
100%
Average 85%
Audio
100%
Average 89%
Images
99%
Average 94%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Search
93%
Average 84%
Organizational Interface
94%
Average 83%
File Preview
95%
Average 84%
 
Daminion
Daminion
81 ratings
4.6 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Daminion Software
  • Location: Seattle, WA
  • Founded: 1999
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 10
  • Website: daminion.net

Product Synopsis

 

Daminion has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 96% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 90% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Daminion at a rate of 92%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
94%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
87%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
89%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
89%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
94%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
86%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
95%
Average 94%
Metadata
94%
Average 90%
File Types
92%
Average 89%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Integration with Creative Software
81%
Average 82%
Digital Rights Management
81%
Average 86%
Watermark
81%
Average 85%
 
Flight by Canto
Flight by Canto
68 ratings
4.0 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Canto
  • Location: San Francisco, CA
  • Founded: 1990
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 134
  • Website: www.canto.com

Product Synopsis

 

Flight by Canto has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 85% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 85% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Flight at a rate of 80%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
86%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
84%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
82%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
85%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
90%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
84%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Expiration
93%
Average 88%
Images
92%
Average 94%
File Types
91%
Average 89%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Integration with Creative Software
78%
Average 82%
Performance and Reliability
79%
Average 85%
File Preview
80%
Average 84%
 
Cumulus
Cumulus
79 ratings
4.2 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Canto
  • Location: San Francisco, CA
  • Founded: 1990
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 134
  • Website: www.canto.com

Product Synopsis

 

Cumulus has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 91% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 84% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Cumulus at a rate of 84%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
84%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
83%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
88%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
81%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
89%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
75%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
95%
Average 94%
Audio
93%
Average 89%
Metadata
92%
Average 90%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Integration with Marketing Software
75%
Average 86%
Integration with Creative Software
80%
Average 82%
Watermark
83%
Average 85%
 
Extensis Portfolio
Extensis Portfolio
51 ratings
4.1 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Extensis
  • Location: Portland, OR
  • Founded: 1993
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 95
  • Website: www.extensis.com

Product Synopsis

 

Extensis Portfolio has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 86% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 78% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Extensis at a rate of 82%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
87%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
83%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
84%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
86%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
89%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
74%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
96%
Average 94%
File Types
94%
Average 89%
Metadata
92%
Average 90%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Versioning
77%
Average 84%
Watermark
77%
Average 85%
Expiration
80%
Average 88%
 
MediaValet
MediaValet
32 ratings
4.3 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: MediaValet
  • Location: Vancouver, Canada
  • Founded: 2010
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 48
  • Website: www.mediavalet.com

Product Synopsis

 

MediaValet has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 88% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 90% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend MediaValet at a rate of 86%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
96%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
86%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
89%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
87%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
93%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
90%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
94%
Average 94%
Audio
93%
Average 89%
Video
92%
Average 86%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Integration with Creative Software
80%
Average 82%
Workflow Management
83%
Average 83%
Organizational Interface
85%
Average 83%
 
Bynder
Bynder
26 ratings
4.6 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Bynder
  • Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Founded: 2013
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 261
  • Website: www.bynder.com

Product Synopsis

 

Bynder has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 100% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Bynder at a rate of 93%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
91%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
92%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
88%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
86%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
94%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
82%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
97%
Average 94%
Audio
92%
Average 89%
Video
91%
Average 86%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Integration with Creative Software
79%
Average 82%
Workflow Management
83%
Average 83%
File Transformation
84%
Average 86%
 
Smartimage
Smartimage
29 ratings
4.5 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Widen
  • Location: Madison, WI
  • Founded: 1948
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 103
  • Website: www.widen.com

Product Synopsis

 

Smartimage has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 97% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 86% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Smartimage at a rate of 91%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
94%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
93%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
89%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
93%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
95%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
94%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Expiration
98%
Average 88%
Images
97%
Average 94%
Performance and Reliability
95%
Average 85%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Video
82%
Average 86%
Search
83%
Average 84%
Organizational Interface
88%
Average 83%
 
MerlinOne
MerlinOne
15 ratings
4.9 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: MerlinOne
  • Location: Quincy, MA
  • Founded: 1988
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 27
  • Website: www.MerlinOne.com

Product Synopsis

 

MerlinOne has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 93% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend MerlinOne at a rate of 98%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
100%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
95%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
92%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
94%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
100%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
91%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
98%
Average 94%
Performance and Reliability
98%
Average 85%
Watermark
98%
Average 85%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
File Transformation
86%
Average 86%
Versioning
88%
Average 84%
Web Portal
90%
Average 87%
 
Asset Bank
Asset Bank
29 ratings
4.5 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Asset Bank
  • Location: Brighton, United Kingdom
  • Founded: 2005
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 5
  • Website: www.assetbank.co.uk

Product Synopsis

 

Asset Bank has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 97% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 100% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Asset Bank at a rate of 89%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
93%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
89%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
90%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
84%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
94%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
78%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Metadata
95%
Average 90%
Expiration
95%
Average 88%
Versioning
95%
Average 84%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Audio
86%
Average 89%
Organizational Interface
88%
Average 83%
Video
89%
Average 86%
 
Brandworkz
Brandworkz
16 ratings
4.5 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Brandworkz
  • Location: London, United Kingdom
  • Founded: 1997
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 29
  • Website: www.brandworkz.com

Product Synopsis

 

Brandworkz has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 94% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 94% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Brandworkz at a rate of 90%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
93%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
86%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
88%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
92%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
97%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
83%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Watermark
94%
Average 85%
Expiration
94%
Average 88%
Images
93%
Average 94%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Integration with Creative Software
79%
Average 82%
Search
81%
Average 84%
Workflow Management
84%
Average 83%
 
iNEWS
iNEWS
13 ratings
4.0 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Avid Technology (NASDAQ: AVID)
  • Location: Burlington, MA
  • Founded: 1987
  • 2015 Revenue: $505.6 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 1.61k
  • Website: www.avid.com

Product Synopsis

 

iNEWS has been named a High Performer based on receiving a high customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 85% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 83% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend iNEWS at a rate of 79%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
82%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
79%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
88%
Average 86%
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Admin
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Doing Business With
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Setup

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Not enough data for highest-rated features

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Not enough data for lowest-rated features
 
CONTENTdm
CONTENTdm
23 ratings
4.0 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: OCLC
  • Location: Dublin, OH
  • Founded: 1967
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 1.1k
  • Website: www.oclc.org

Product Synopsis

 

CONTENTdm has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 96% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 77% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend CONTENTdm at a rate of 79%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
83%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
82%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
86%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
84%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
87%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
79%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
93%
Average 94%
Metadata
90%
Average 90%
Integration with Creative Software
89%
Average 82%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Versioning
78%
Average 84%
Search
79%
Average 84%
Import/Export
80%
Average 85%
 
Documentum
Documentum
30 ratings
3.5 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Dell EMC
  • Location: Hopkinton, MA
  • Founded: 1979
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 53.7k
  • Website: www.emc.com

Product Synopsis

 

Documentum has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. Documentum has the largest Market Presence among Digital Asset Management products. 70% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 41% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Documentum at a rate of 69%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
73%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
70%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
80%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
66%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
67%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
56%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Watermark
97%
Average 85%
Metadata
94%
Average 90%
Versioning
93%
Average 89%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Mobile Apps
54%
Average 54%
Reporting and Auditing
65%
Average 74%
Collaboration
69%
Average 69%
 
OpenText MediaBin
OpenText MediaBin
15 ratings
3.8 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: OpenText (NASDAQ: OTEX)
  • Location: Waterloo, Canada
  • Founded: 1991
  • 2016 Revenue: $1,824.2 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 8.12k
  • Website: www.opentext.com

Product Synopsis

 

OpenText MediaBin has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 87% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 73% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend OpenText MediaBin at a rate of 77%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
69%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
80%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
78%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
76%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
77%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
67%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
90%
Average 94%
File Types
87%
Average 89%
Integration with Creative Software
86%
Average 82%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Web Portal
75%
Average 87%
Workflow Management
76%
Average 83%
Performance and Reliability
76%
Average 85%
 
assetSERV
assetSERV
11 ratings
3.7 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Cognizant (NASDAQ: CTSH)
  • Location: Teaneck, NJ
  • Founded: 1994
  • 2015 Revenue: $12,416.0 MM
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 200k
  • Website: www.cognizant.com

Product Synopsis

 

assetSERV has been named a Contender based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a large Market Presence. 73% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 45% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend assetSERV at a rate of 74%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
87%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
69%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
76%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
82%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
83%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
78%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
88%
Average 94%
Metadata
86%
Average 90%
File Types
83%
Average 89%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Versioning
54%
Average 84%
Import/Export
61%
Average 85%
Performance and Reliability
62%
Average 85%
 
Percolate
Percolate
17 ratings
3.6 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Percolate
  • Location: New York, NY
  • Founded: 2011
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 282
  • Website: percolate.com

Product Synopsis

 

Percolate has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 76% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 75% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Percolate at a rate of 72%. Percolate is also in the Social Media Monitoring, Content Marketing, Social Customer Service, and Marketing Analytics categories.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
89%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
78%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
74%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
84%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
91%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
84%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
96%
Average 94%
Audio
95%
Average 89%
Digital Rights Management
90%
Average 86%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Search
72%
Average 84%
Integration with Creative Software
74%
Average 82%
Import/Export
76%
Average 85%
 
censhare Digital Experience Platform
censhare Digital Experience Platform
16 ratings
4.6 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: censhare AG
  • Location: Munich, Germany
  • Founded: 2001
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 136
  • Website: www.censhare.com

Product Synopsis

 

censhare Digital Experience Platform has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 100% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend censhare at a rate of 91%. censhare is also in the Web Content Management and Product Information Management (PIM) categories.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
88%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
77%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
88%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
70%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
92%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
68%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Internationalization
100%
Average 100%
Content Repository
100%
Average 100%
Versioning
100%
Average 100%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Dashboards and Reports
80%
Average 80%
Search
82%
Average 84%
Video
84%
Average 86%
 
ResourceSpace
ResourceSpace
13 ratings
4.2 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: ResourceSpace
  • Location: Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
  • Founded: 2005
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 8
  • Website: www.resourcespace.org

Product Synopsis

 

ResourceSpace has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 92% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 85% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend ResourceSpace at a rate of 85%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
84%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
86%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
87%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
85%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
84%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
79%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Web Portal
88%
Average 87%
File Types
88%
Average 89%
File Preview
88%
Average 84%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Watermark
69%
Average 85%
Digital Rights Management
76%
Average 86%
Video
77%
Average 86%
 
Nuxeo
Nuxeo
17 ratings
4.1 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Nuxeo
  • Location: Brooklyn, NY
  • Founded: 2001
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 95
  • Website: www.nuxeo.com

Product Synopsis

 

Nuxeo has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 88% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 81% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Nuxeo at a rate of 82%. Nuxeo is also in the Enterprise Content Management (ECM) category.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
86%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
81%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
87%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
79%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
70%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
66%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Security
100%
Average 92%
Records Management
100%
Average 90%
API's
98%
Average 87%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Performance and Reliability
77%
Average 76%
Integration with Creative Software
79%
Average 82%
Reporting and Auditing
83%
Average 74%
 
NetX
NetX
10 ratings
4.1 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: NetXposure
  • Location: Portland, OR
  • Founded: 1996
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 37
  • Website: www.netx.net

Product Synopsis

 

NetX has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 100% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 80% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend NetX at a rate of 82%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
89%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
81%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
83%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
80%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
90%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
67%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
100%
Average 94%
File Types
99%
Average 89%
File Transformation
94%
Average 86%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Workflow Management
77%
Average 83%
Import/Export
80%
Average 85%
Organizational Interface
81%
Average 83%
 
CELUM
CELUM
14 ratings
3.9 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: CELUM
  • Location: Linz, Austria
  • Founded: 1999
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 67
  • Website: www.celum.com

Product Synopsis

 

CELUM has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 86% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 93% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend CELUM at a rate of 78%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
79%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
80%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
86%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
78%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
87%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
73%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
91%
Average 94%
File Types
86%
Average 89%
Metadata
85%
Average 90%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Watermark
67%
Average 85%
Integration with Creative Software
68%
Average 82%
Digital Rights Management
69%
Average 86%
 
Xinet
Xinet
13 ratings
3.7 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: North Plains
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • Founded: 1994
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 86
  • Website: www.northplains.com

Product Synopsis

 

Xinet has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 77% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 38% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend Xinet at a rate of 74%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
84%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
78%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
80%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
79%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
79%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
71%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
87%
Average 94%
Audio
86%
Average 89%
User, Role, and Access Management
84%
Average 87%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Organizational Interface
74%
Average 83%
Search
77%
Average 84%
Versioning
78%
Average 84%
 
WoodWing Elvis DAM
WoodWing Elvis DAM
15 ratings
4.0 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: WoodWing
  • Location: Zaandam, Netherlands
  • Founded: 2000
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 117
  • Website: www.woodwing.com

Product Synopsis

 

WoodWing Elvis DAM has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 87% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 73% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend WoodWing at a rate of 80%.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
82%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
86%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
83%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
75%
Average 83%
 
Ease of Doing Business With
84%
Average 89%
 
Ease of Setup
70%
Average 80%

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Images
92%
Average 94%
File Types
87%
Average 89%
Integration with Creative Software
86%
Average 82%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Web Portal
74%
Average 87%
Workflow Management
77%
Average 83%
Video
79%
Average 86%
 
MediaBank
MediaBank
11 ratings
3.5 out of 5 stars
 

Vendor Information

 
  • Vendor: Wave
  • Location: Orlando, FL
  • Founded: 1987
  • 2017 Revenue: n/a (private company)
  • Employees (Listed on LinkedIn™): 15
  • Website: www.wavecorp.com

Product Synopsis

 

MediaBank has been named a Niche vendor based on receiving a relatively low customer Satisfaction score and having a small Market Presence. 64% of users rated it 4 or 5 stars, 55% of users believe it is headed in the right direction, and users said they would be likely to recommend MediaBank at a rate of 69%. MediaBank is also in the Enterprise Content Management (ECM) category.

Satisfaction Ratings

 
 
Quality of Support
81%
Average 88%
 
Ease of Use
68%
Average 84%
 
Meets Requirements
79%
Average 86%
 
Ease of Admin
66%
Average 83%
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Setup
 
Not enough data available for Ease of Doing Business

Top Industries Represented

 

Review Breakdown

 
 

Highest-Rated Features

 
Search
81%
Average 84%
Video
77%
Average 86%
Import/Export
74%
Average 85%

Lowest-Rated Features

 
Performance and Reliability
64%
Average 85%
Workflow Management
66%
Average 83%
File Preview
66%
Average 84%
 

Satisfaction Ratings

 
G2 Crowd users rated digital asset management software vendors' ability to satisfy their needs as shown in the table below.
Widen
Wiredrive
Webdam
Brandfolder
Libris
IntelligenceBank
Daminion
Flight
Cumulus
Extensis
MediaValet
Bynder
Smartimage
MerlinOne
Asset Bank
Brandworkz
iNEWS
CONTENTdm
Documentum
OpenText MediaBin
assetSERV
Percolate
censhare
ResourceSpace
Nuxeo
NetX
CELUM
Xinet
WoodWing
MediaBank
Average
Satisfaction
Likely to Recommend
94%
86%
82%
93%
92%
99%
92%
80%
84%
82%
86%
93%
91%
98%
89%
90%
79%
79%
69%
77%
74%
72%
91%
85%
82%
82%
78%
74%
80%
69%
84%
Product Going in Right Direction?
97%
80%
85%
97%
98%
97%
90%
85%
84%
78%
90%
100%
86%
93%
100%
94%
83%
77%
41%
73%
45%
75%
100%
85%
81%
80%
93%
38%
73%
55%
82%

Satisfaction by Category

Meets Requirements
91%
87%
84%
91%
90%
97%
89%
82%
88%
84%
89%
88%
89%
92%
90%
88%
88%
86%
80%
78%
76%
74%
88%
87%
87%
83%
86%
80%
83%
79%
86%
Ease of Admin
89%
87%
83%
95%
91%
95%
89%
85%
81%
86%
87%
86%
93%
94%
84%
92%
n/a
84%
66%
76%
82%
84%
70%
85%
79%
80%
78%
79%
75%
66%
83%
Ease of Doing Business
97%
92%
87%
97%
97%
98%
94%
90%
89%
89%
93%
94%
95%
100%
94%
97%
n/a
87%
67%
77%
83%
91%
92%
84%
70%
90%
87%
79%
84%
n/a
89%
Quality of Support
97%
88%
86%
96%
96%
100%
94%
86%
84%
87%
96%
91%
94%
100%
93%
93%
82%
83%
73%
69%
87%
89%
88%
84%
86%
89%
79%
84%
82%
81%
88%
Ease of Setup
85%
88%
81%
94%
90%
95%
86%
84%
75%
74%
90%
82%
94%
91%
78%
83%
n/a
79%
56%
67%
78%
84%
68%
79%
66%
67%
73%
71%
70%
n/a
80%
Ease of Use
92%
87%
83%
95%
91%
97%
87%
84%
83%
83%
86%
92%
93%
95%
89%
86%
79%
82%
70%
80%
69%
78%
77%
86%
81%
81%
80%
78%
86%
68%
84%
Widen
Wiredrive
Webdam
Brandfolder
Libris
IntelligenceBank
Daminion
Flight
Cumulus
Extensis
MediaValet
Bynder
Smartimage
MerlinOne
Asset Bank
Brandworkz
iNEWS
CONTENTdm
Documentum
OpenText MediaBin
assetSERV
Percolate
censhare
ResourceSpace
Nuxeo
NetX
CELUM
Xinet
WoodWing
MediaBank
Average
Net Promoter Score (NPS)
Net Promoter Score (NPS) (Range from -100 to +100)
85
47
33
78
75
100
74
26
42
31
56
81
69
100
59
69
8
22
-7
13
0
24
75
38
29
30
36
0
33
-27
43
 
*n/a is displayed when fewer than five responses were received for the question


 

Feature Comparison

 
G2 Crowd users have evaluated digital asset management software products by feature. Feature ratings are representative of reviewers' overall satisfaction with each feature and do not necessarily take into account the breadth of individual product features. The results are shown below.
Widen
Wiredrive
Webdam
Brandfolder
Libris
IntelligenceBank
Daminion
Flight
Cumulus
Extensis
MediaValet
Bynder
Smartimage
MerlinOne
Asset Bank
Brandworkz
iNEWS
CONTENTdm
Documentum
OpenText MediaBin
assetSERV
Percolate
censhare
ResourceSpace
Nuxeo
NetX
CELUM
Xinet
WoodWing
MediaBank
Average
Interface and Performance
Import/Export
90%
90%
81%
93%
92%
96%
86%
82%
85%
88%
88%
84%
93%
93%
92%
90%
n/a
80%
79%
81%
61%
76%
89%
84%
86%
80%
79%
83%
82%
74%
85%
Organizational Interface
87%
83%
81%
92%
88%
94%
89%
82%
85%
83%
85%
88%
88%
95%
88%
90%
n/a
80%
75%
78%
63%
83%
85%
82%
88%
81%
75%
74%
79%
69%
83%
Search
90%
81%
80%
88%
87%
93%
90%
86%
89%
85%
88%
86%
83%
94%
91%
81%
n/a
79%
86%
81%
67%
72%
82%
87%
91%
86%
80%
77%
85%
81%
84%
File Preview
91%
86%
81%
91%
87%
95%
85%
80%
85%
87%
87%
88%
90%
93%
92%
87%
n/a
84%
74%
83%
63%
82%
88%
88%
90%
81%
80%
80%
85%
66%
84%
Widen
Wiredrive
Webdam
Brandfolder
Libris
IntelligenceBank
Daminion
Flight
Cumulus
Extensis
MediaValet
Bynder
Smartimage
MerlinOne
Asset Bank
Brandworkz
iNEWS
CONTENTdm
Documentum
OpenText MediaBin
assetSERV
Percolate
censhare
ResourceSpace
Nuxeo
NetX
CELUM
Xinet
WoodWing
MediaBank
Average
Asset Management
File Types
94%
92%
89%
94%
91%
98%
92%
91%
91%
94%
90%
88%
92%
95%
94%
89%
n/a
86%
88%
87%
83%
87%
91%
88%
89%
99%
86%
80%
87%
69%
89%
Metadata
93%
86%
89%
92%
94%
98%
94%
83%
92%
92%
89%
90%
91%
91%
95%
89%
n/a
90%
94%
85%
86%
81%
96%
87%
94%
89%
85%
84%
83%
n/a
90%
File Transformation
93%
87%
87%
90%
94%
97%
88%
84%
84%
87%
86%
84%
90%
86%
93%
87%
n/a
82%
85%
83%
71%
79%
92%
81%
88%
94%
82%
80%
79%
n/a
86%
Versioning
92%
82%
87%
88%
98%
83%
85%
88%
77%
88%
85%
n/a
88%
95%
84%
n/a
78%
91%
85%
54%
83%
93%
81%
90%
88%
73%
78%
81%
69%
84%
Expiration
91%
90%
88%
93%
95%
98%
84%
93%
83%
80%
89%
86%
98%
96%
95%
94%
n/a
80%
91%
78%
n/a
n/a
88%
84%
88%
n/a
81%
83%
80%
n/a
88%
Watermark
88%
80%
83%
93%
100%
81%
89%
83%
77%
89%
89%
98%
94%
94%
n/a
84%
97%
77%
n/a
79%
90%
69%
n/a
n/a
67%
81%
n/a
n/a
85%
Digital Rights Management
91%
81%
86%
93%
99%
81%
80%
90%
80%
89%
87%
91%
91%
92%
n/a
86%
89%
81%
77%
90%
90%
76%
90%
n/a
69%
82%
82%
n/a
86%
Widen
Wiredrive
Webdam
Brandfolder
Libris
IntelligenceBank
Daminion
Flight
Cumulus
Extensis
MediaValet
Bynder
Smartimage
MerlinOne
Asset Bank
Brandworkz
iNEWS
CONTENTdm
Documentum
OpenText MediaBin
assetSERV
Percolate
censhare
ResourceSpace
Nuxeo
NetX
CELUM
Xinet
WoodWing
MediaBank
Average
Media Types
Video
93%
94%
87%
92%
91%
98%
82%
82%
85%
83%
92%
91%
82%
n/a
89%
89%
n/a
85%
86%
77%
n/a
89%
84%
77%
93%
91%
76%
79%
79%
77%
86%
Audio
94%
93%
88%
95%
94%
100%
89%
87%
93%
82%
93%
92%
n/a
86%
93%
n/a
85%
89%
79%
n/a
95%
86%
79%
92%
n/a
74%
86%
n/a
n/a
89%
Images
98%
93%
93%
97%
98%
99%
95%
92%
95%
96%
94%
97%
97%
98%
95%
93%
n/a
93%
92%
90%
88%
96%
95%
86%
92%
100%
91%
87%
92%
n/a
94%
Widen
Wiredrive
Webdam
Brandfolder
Libris
IntelligenceBank
Daminion
Flight
Cumulus
Extensis
MediaValet
Bynder
Smartimage
MerlinOne
Asset Bank
Brandworkz
iNEWS
CONTENTdm
Documentum
OpenText MediaBin
assetSERV
Percolate
censhare
ResourceSpace
Nuxeo
NetX
CELUM
Xinet
WoodWing
MediaBank
Average
Administration
Integration with Marketing Software
81%
87%
n/a
81%
96%
99%
n/a
84%
75%
84%
87%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
86%
Integration with Creative Software
88%
79%
76%
84%
88%
99%
81%
78%
80%
83%
80%
79%
n/a
90%
79%
n/a
89%
88%
86%
n/a
74%
86%
79%
n/a
68%
82%
86%
n/a
82%
Workflow Management
90%
87%
82%
92%
90%
97%
83%
86%
82%
83%
83%
n/a
92%
90%
84%
n/a
80%
82%
76%
74%
77%
95%
79%
89%
77%
71%
81%
77%
66%
83%
User, Role, and Access Management
91%
87%
86%
94%
87%
96%
86%
87%
87%
84%
85%
90%
89%
96%
90%
90%
n/a
82%
90%
80%
79%
84%
94%
82%
90%
90%
74%
84%
81%
n/a
87%
Web Portal
90%
89%
84%
92%
91%
97%
84%
84%
87%
85%
88%
91%
91%
90%
91%
87%
n/a
84%
75%
75%
n/a
89%
92%
88%
88%
93%
75%
84%
74%
n/a
87%
Performance and Reliability
94%
89%
78%
94%
95%
98%
87%
79%
85%
82%
86%
91%
95%
98%
92%
88%
n/a
84%
77%
76%
62%
80%
88%
87%
86%
92%
76%
84%
84%
64%
85%
 
*n/a is displayed when fewer than five responses were received for the question

**A gray box indicates that a vendor has selected that they do not offer that feature.



 

Additional Data

Additional product data on customer segments, deployment and implementation, user adoption and ROI, and market presence is displayed below.

Customer Segments Served

Widen
Wiredrive
Webdam
Brandfolder
Libris
IntelligenceBank
Daminion
Flight
Cumulus
Extensis
MediaValet
Bynder
Smartimage
MerlinOne
Asset Bank
Brandworkz
iNEWS
CONTENTdm
Documentum
OpenText MediaBin
assetSERV
Percolate
censhare
ResourceSpace
Nuxeo
NetX
CELUM
Xinet
WoodWing
MediaBank
Average
Customers by Size
Small Business (50 or fewer emp.)13%44%12%40%31%55%68%38%13%10%28%15%36%0%11%31%15%10%4%8%0%24%6%0%0%0%15%8%21%9%18%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)33%37%49%44%40%23%10%42%42%47%47%54%50%80%50%38%38%40%29%31%9%35%63%80%29%56%31%46%50%55%42%
Enterprise ( >1000 emp.)54%19%38%16%29%22%23%20%45%43%25%31%14%20%39%31%46%50%68%62%91%41%31%20%71%44%54%46%29%36%38%
Widen
Wiredrive
Webdam
Brandfolder
Libris
IntelligenceBank
Daminion
Flight
Cumulus
Extensis
MediaValet
Bynder
Smartimage
MerlinOne
Asset Bank
Brandworkz
iNEWS
CONTENTdm
Documentum
OpenText MediaBin
assetSERV
Percolate
censhare
ResourceSpace
Nuxeo
NetX
CELUM
Xinet
WoodWing
MediaBank
Deployment Method
Cloud
100%
74%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
14%
50%
100%
100%
100%
91%
54%
100%
100%
45%
11%
25%
86%
43%
29%
58%
33%
80%
33%
0%
38%
n/a
On-Premise
0%
26%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
86%
50%
0%
0%
0%
9%
46%
0%
0%
55%
89%
75%
14%
57%
71%
42%
67%
20%
67%
100%
63%
n/a

Implementation Time

Avg. Months to Go Live
3.5
0.8
2.8
0.5
1.2
1.4
0.6
2.2
3.3
1.6
1.6
3.5
0.8
2.6
3.0
3.8
n/a
2.6
9.3
n/a
5.3
1.0
n/a
2.2
5.4
5.6
3.8
4.7
1.8
n/a

Implementation Method

Led by In-House Team
83%
91%
91%
96%
91%
70%
97%
79%
69%
67%
77%
53%
96%
45%
73%
57%
n/a
70%
55%
80%
33%
71%
n/a
56%
89%
78%
33%
38%
50%
n/a
Led by Vendor PS
15%
7%
6%
4%
9%
27%
0%
14%
27%
30%
23%
47%
4%
55%
27%
43%
n/a
30%
27%
20%
67%
29%
n/a
33%
11%
11%
44%
38%
33%
n/a
Led by 3rd Party
2%
1%
3%
0%
0%
3%
3%
7%
4%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
n/a
0%
18%
0%
0%
0%
n/a
11%
0%
11%
22%
25%
17%
n/a

Number of Users Purchased

Median Number of Users Bought
175
17
37
3
3
17
3
17
17
17
125
175
3
n/a
175
75
n/a
n/a
750
375
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
7
n/a
175
175
39
n/a

Contract Term

Avg. Contract Term (Months)
11
8
17
10
11
12
9
11
17
16
20
23
8
n/a
13
22
n/a
14
19
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
8
10
18
3
n/a
4
n/a
Widen
Wiredrive
Webdam
Brandfolder
Libris
IntelligenceBank
Daminion
Flight
Cumulus
Extensis
MediaValet
Bynder
Smartimage
MerlinOne
Asset Bank
Brandworkz
iNEWS
CONTENTdm
Documentum
OpenText MediaBin
assetSERV
Percolate
censhare
ResourceSpace
Nuxeo
NetX
CELUM
Xinet
WoodWing
MediaBank
Average
User Adoption
Average User Adoption
66%
80%
50%
66%
66%
75%
63%
56%
65%
70%
55%
65%
59%
81%
63%
67%
n/a
61%
60%
49%
54%
61%
n/a
62%
48%
60%
58%
78%
57%
n/a
63%
Widen
Wiredrive
Webdam
Brandfolder
Libris
IntelligenceBank
Daminion
Flight
Cumulus
Extensis
MediaValet
Bynder
Smartimage
MerlinOne
Asset Bank
Brandworkz
iNEWS
CONTENTdm
Documentum
OpenText MediaBin
assetSERV
Percolate
censhare
ResourceSpace
Nuxeo
NetX
CELUM
Xinet
WoodWing
MediaBank
Average
Payback Period
Avg. Payback Period (Months)
15
10
19
13
16
8
15
12
24
13
n/a
32
10
n/a
22
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
5
16
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
15
Widen
Wiredrive
Webdam
Brandfolder
Libris
IntelligenceBank
Daminion
Flight
Cumulus
Extensis
MediaValet
Bynder
Smartimage
MerlinOne
Asset Bank
Brandworkz
iNEWS
CONTENTdm
Documentum
OpenText MediaBin
assetSERV
Percolate
censhare
ResourceSpace
Nuxeo
NetX
CELUM
Xinet
WoodWing
MediaBank
Vendor Information
Vendor Name
Widen
Wiredrive
Shutterstock
Brandfolder
PhotoShelter
Intelligence Bank
Daminion Software
Canto
Canto
Extensis
MediaValet
Bynder
Widen
MerlinOne
Asset Bank
Brandworkz
Avid Technology
OCLC
Dell EMC
OpenText
Cognizant
Percolate
censhare AG
Resource Space
Nuxeo
NetXposure
CELUM
North Plains
WoodWing
Wave
Year Founded
1948
2000
2003
2012
2005
2009
1999
1990
1990
1993
2010
2013
1948
1988
2005
1997
1987
1967
1979
1991
1994
2011
2001
2005
2001
1996
1999
1994
2000
1987
Revenue ($MM)
n/a
n/a
$425
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
$506
n/a
n/a
$1,824
$12,416
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Employees on LinkedIn (Vendor)
103
39
1,929
22
99
29
10
134
134
95
48
261
103
27
5
29
1,607
1,099
53,680
8,119
199,544
282
136
8
95
37
67
86
117
15
LinkedIn Followers
1,247
783
21,850
473
5,106
488
56
2,850
2,850
1,021
767
5,754
1,247
2,259
101
372
43,090
13,902
714,857
78,068
1,049,148
25
968
34
2,036
113
1,283
2,212
2,386
37
Twitter Followers (Vendor)
Twitter Followers (Product)
2,042
1,830
3,644
1,981
740
36
941
1,404
4,774
5,825
895
1,446
361
206
581
1,874
73,783
22,679
120,932
15,648
179,573
37,506
1,198
212
2,191
3
1,583
1,176
671
179
Klout Score (Vendor)
54
53
83
48
60
44
41
47
47
48
49
10
54
30
40
49
80
64
79
79
85
57
46
41
51
29
45
45
46
25
Klout Score (Product)
50
59
50
49
50
35
30
50
50
49
49
10
39
33
40
43
n/a
64
55
12
75
61
44
39
49
23
45
23
45
n/a
Glassdoor Rating
4.9
4.9
3.4
4
n/a
5
n/a
2.7
2.7
3.7
3.0
4.9
4.9
5
n/a
5
2.7
3.5
3.8
3.1
3.6
3.2
4.8
n/a
4.7
2.8
2
2.3
4
n/a
Alexa Web Traffic Rank
470,451
88,145
288
115,817
8,325
375,398
472,875
433,659
433,659
109,331
674,243
215,014
470,451
966,653
605,096
641,260
11,140
6,177
11,330
39,250
5,938
72,492
860,941
n/a
248,951
382,493
635,285
516,667
685,956
22,466,706
 

*n/a is displayed when fewer than five responses were received for the question or when data is not publicly available.



© 2017 G2 Crowd, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form without G2 Crowd’s prior written permission. While the information in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, G2 Crowd disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions, or inadequacies in such information.