Compare RealVNC and TightVNC 
- Users report that RealVNC excels in "Quality of Support" with a score of 9.1, while TightVNC falls short at 7.7, indicating that RealVNC provides more responsive and helpful customer service.
- Reviewers mention that RealVNC's "Ease of Use" is rated at 9.4, making it more user-friendly compared to TightVNC's 8.8, which can lead to a smoother experience for those new to remote access software.
- G2 users highlight RealVNC's superior "Unattended Remote Access" feature with a score of 8.9, whereas TightVNC's score of 8.1 suggests it may not be as reliable for users needing consistent access without supervision.
- Users on G2 note that RealVNC offers better "Multi-Monitor Support" with a score of 8.3, which is crucial for users who work with multiple screens, while TightVNC does not provide the same level of functionality.
- Reviewers say that RealVNC's "Session Recording" feature, rated at 7.7, is significantly more effective than TightVNC's lower score of 4.5, indicating that users may find it easier to keep track of sessions with RealVNC.
- Users report that RealVNC's "Cross-Platform Access" is rated at 9.3, making it a more versatile choice for teams using different operating systems, compared to TightVNC's score of 7.6, which may limit its usability in diverse environments.
- Up to 3 managed devices
- 1 licensed user
- Unlimited concurrent connections (to managed devices)
I really like RealVNC because it's lightweight and simple to use
They should make audio compatible with Macs, I wish. They said they were working on it, but for the time being, we can route audio through Skype in a way that works for us. Also there is no support on mobile
In emergency situations when things need to be done urgently, instead of walking back over to your pc you can remote to your pc instead. Saves alot of time and hassle. I work in a few different buildings so I always need to be in and out of them, Tightvnc...
Security is nonexistent (passwords are sent over plain text). It also isn't suitable for computers that need to be accessed remotely and not through some sort encrypted tunnel. It also doesn't have computer management features that other, more robust...
I really like RealVNC because it's lightweight and simple to use
In emergency situations when things need to be done urgently, instead of walking back over to your pc you can remote to your pc instead. Saves alot of time and hassle. I work in a few different buildings so I always need to be in and out of them, Tightvnc...
They should make audio compatible with Macs, I wish. They said they were working on it, but for the time being, we can route audio through Skype in a way that works for us. Also there is no support on mobile
Security is nonexistent (passwords are sent over plain text). It also isn't suitable for computers that need to be accessed remotely and not through some sort encrypted tunnel. It also doesn't have computer management features that other, more robust...
