When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found SugarSync easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Microsoft SharePoint overall.
You can do pretty good stuff with a simple understanding of the product and without having to develop anything.
The tool itself seems like it would be great, but by and large, the implementations of it tend to be awful. The success of this within an organization really depends on having a dedicated team of developers and change management practitioners who can...
This product has multiple uses--it is an on-line backup application, but we have used it for so much more than that. We have a virtual client within our network that our marketing department can send a video, PDF, picture, Word document etc to and then...
First, ot lacks some advanced features such as collaboration and doc editing. Second, it is expensive Overall, SugarSync is a choice for users who are looking for a simple cloud storage and file synchronization service. However, it is important to note...
You can do pretty good stuff with a simple understanding of the product and without having to develop anything.
This product has multiple uses--it is an on-line backup application, but we have used it for so much more than that. We have a virtual client within our network that our marketing department can send a video, PDF, picture, Word document etc to and then...
The tool itself seems like it would be great, but by and large, the implementations of it tend to be awful. The success of this within an organization really depends on having a dedicated team of developers and change management practitioners who can...
First, ot lacks some advanced features such as collaboration and doc editing. Second, it is expensive Overall, SugarSync is a choice for users who are looking for a simple cloud storage and file synchronization service. However, it is important to note...