Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Loopio and Qwilr 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Inventive.AI
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Conveyor
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Perimeter
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (83.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Starting at $35.00 1 User
Loopio
Star Rating
(812)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about LoopioQwilr
Star Rating
(865)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (83.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $35.00 1 User
Free Trial is available
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that both Loopio and Qwilr have a strong ease of use, with Loopio scoring 9.1 and Qwilr at 8.8. Reviewers mention that Loopio's intuitive interface makes it easy for teams to get started quickly, while Qwilr's user-friendly design is praised for its simplicity in creating proposals.
- Reviewers mention that Loopio excels in quality of support, scoring 9.4 compared to Qwilr's 9.1. Users say that Loopio's customer service is responsive and knowledgeable, often providing quick resolutions to issues, while Qwilr's support is also good but slightly less responsive.
- Users on G2 highlight Loopio's superior collaborative creation features, scoring 8.8 against Qwilr's 8.1. Reviewers say that Loopio's real-time collaboration tools allow multiple users to work on documents simultaneously, enhancing teamwork, whereas Qwilr's collaboration features are more limited.
- Reviewers mention that Qwilr shines in rich media capabilities, scoring 8.4 compared to Loopio's 7.4. Users report that Qwilr allows for seamless integration of images, videos, and interactive elements, making proposals more engaging, while Loopio's media options are more basic.
- Users say that Loopio offers better customizability with variables and fields, scoring 8.2 versus Qwilr's 7.9. Reviewers mention that Loopio allows for extensive customization of templates and fields, which is crucial for tailoring documents to specific client needs, while Qwilr's options are somewhat limited.
- G2 users report that both products have similar entry-level pricing, but Qwilr starts at $35.00, making it more accessible for small businesses. Reviewers mention that this pricing structure makes Qwilr an attractive option for startups looking for budget-friendly solutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Loopio
No pricing availableQwilr
Business
Starting at $35.00
1 User
$35/mo billed annually -- or $39/mo billed monthly.
- E-signatures
- Customizable ROI Calculator
- Audit Trail
Free Trial
Loopio
No trial information availableQwilr
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
684
8.7
719
Ease of Use
9.1
687
8.8
722
Ease of Setup
8.8
498
8.9
434
Ease of Admin
9.1
455
8.8
381
Quality of Support
9.4
644
9.1
622
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
448
9.3
370
Product Direction (% positive)
9.3
654
9.2
696
Features by Category
Signature Process
Not enough data
9.1
206
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
172
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
191
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
167
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
169
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
108
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
157
Not enough data
8.9
178
|
Verified
Agentic AI - E-Signature
Not enough data
6.1
12
Not enough data
6.5
12
Not enough data
6.4
12
Not enough data
6.4
12
Not enough data
5.8
12
Not enough data
6.1
12
Security and Scalability
Not enough data
8.7
153
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
180
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
142
|
Verified
Platform
Not enough data
8.6
153
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
148
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
128
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
153
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
125
|
Verified
Configuration - cpq
Not enough data
8.2
26
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
23
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
27
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
30
|
Verified
Pricing
Not enough data
8.6
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
31
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
28
Not enough data
9.2
32
Not enough data
8.9
29
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
21
|
Verified
Quoting
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
8.1
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
30
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
27
|
Verified
Admin
Not enough data
8.6
63
Not enough data
8.6
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
58
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
57
|
Verified
Channels
Not enough data
8.4
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
17
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
17
|
Verified
Platform
Not enough data
7.6
52
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
43
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
58
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
57
|
Verified
Not enough data
6.7
10
Generative AI - cpq
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Document Creation
8.2
327
|
Verified
7.9
532
|
Verified
8.0
316
|
Verified
8.3
548
|
Verified
7.4
281
|
Verified
8.4
519
|
Verified
8.0
275
|
Verified
8.9
517
|
Verified
7.9
263
|
Verified
7.7
506
|
Verified
8.3
288
|
Verified
8.4
526
|
Verified
Workflow
8.3
303
|
Verified
8.3
497
|
Verified
8.8
322
|
Verified
8.1
453
|
Verified
8.6
317
|
Verified
8.4
279
|
Verified
Analytics
Feature Not Available
8.3
492
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
8.2
442
|
Verified
8.0
276
|
Verified
8.0
449
|
Verified
Administration and Platform
9.0
340
|
Verified
8.5
446
|
Verified
8.7
336
|
Verified
8.4
474
|
Verified
7.5
175
|
Verified
7.6
318
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
8.7
364
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
7.9
245
|
Verified
7.6
170
7.8
290
|
Verified
Generative AI
7.3
95
7.3
64
Contract Management Platform Features
Not enough data
9.0
129
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
124
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
123
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
107
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
104
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
123
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
113
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
106
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
101
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
110
|
Verified
Generative AI
Not enough data
7.3
19
Not enough data
7.4
19
Agentic AI - Contract Management
Not enough data
7.0
5
RFP Generation
8.1
362
Not enough data
8.6
354
Not enough data
8.2
333
Not enough data
9.2
418
Not enough data
RFP Distribution
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Submissions
9.1
410
Not enough data
9.2
418
Not enough data
8.9
404
Not enough data
7.8
284
Not enough data
RFP Response
8.8
370
Not enough data
9.1
391
Not enough data
9.0
383
Not enough data
8.2
300
Not enough data
8.1
307
Not enough data
7.9
305
Not enough data
Agentic AI - RFP
6.4
56
Not enough data
6.6
56
Not enough data
6.5
55
Not enough data
Data Sources
Not enough data
8.5
72
Not enough data
7.6
54
Not enough data
8.4
76
Generation
Not enough data
8.6
92
Not enough data
8.4
79
Not enough data
8.7
89
Delivery
Not enough data
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.4
60
Not enough data
8.1
54
Generative AI
Not enough data
6.8
18
Not enough data
6.5
18
Not enough data
5.9
18
Not enough data
6.5
18
Agentic AI - Document Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
163
Not enough data
Risk assessment
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
6.6
47
Not enough data
Generative AI - Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment
7.1
47
Not enough data
7.3
51
Not enough data
Deal Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Sales Room
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Salesforce AppExchange Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Sales Enablement
Not enough data
6.3
5
Not enough data
6.3
5
Not enough data
6.3
5
Content Management
Not enough data
8.6
64
Not enough data
8.8
72
Not enough data
8.6
72
Not enough data
8.0
60
Not enough data
8.6
62
Analytics
Not enough data
8.5
66
Not enough data
8.6
64
Not enough data
7.7
59
Not enough data
8.5
61
Learning Management - Sales Enablement
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Revenue Enablement - Sales Enablement
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Loopio and Qwilr are categorized as Proposal
Unique Categories
Loopio is categorized as RFP, Salesforce AppExchange Apps, and Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment
Qwilr is categorized as Document Generation, E-Signature, CPQ, Contract Management, Sales Enablement, and Digital Sales Room
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Loopio
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Qwilr
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
28.6%
Information Technology and Services
13.7%
Financial Services
7.9%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Marketing and Advertising
3.4%
Other
42.0%
Marketing and Advertising
24.9%
Computer Software
10.1%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Internet
3.8%
Staffing and Recruiting
2.6%
Other
48.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
How do we versino control changes to content?
3 Comments
BK
Version Control:
1) If you are releasing multiple versions of software you can version control on your answer through creating a tag for that version....Read more
What is the best way to use the "Library"?
2 Comments
SM
Hi Gokul,
Great question! We currently have a workflow that allows you to thoughtfully update your Library, as you respond to an RFP. This allows you to...Read more
Can I issue RFPs with Loopio?
1 Comment
Official Response from Loopio
No. Loopio's RFP software is designed to help organizations respond to RFPs, DDQs, and Security Questionnaires.Read more
All features
2 Comments
JB
Depending on the level of your plan you get access to different features. The only plan that lets you have a license with 1 single seat is the pro plan,...Read more
What are 'Qwilr Pages'?
1 Comment
Official Response from Qwilr
Qwilr Pages are interactive and mobile-friendly webpages that Qwilr allows you to create and reuse as easily as you would a Word document or a PowerPoint...Read more
Why focus on webpages?
1 Comment
Official Response from Qwilr
As smart webpages, your sales documents can be so much more powerful than the boring, static PDFs we've spent almost 3 decades using. The contents of your...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
