Compare Jitsi and Microsoft Teams 
- Users report that Microsoft Teams excels in its screen sharing capabilities, with a rating of 9.0, while Jitsi's screen sharing feature is rated at 8.8. Reviewers mention that Teams provides a more seamless experience for collaborative presentations.
- Reviewers mention that Microsoft Teams offers superior meeting coordination features, particularly in scheduling with a score of 9.0 compared to Jitsi's 8.1. Users say that Teams integrates well with Outlook, making it easier to schedule meetings directly from their calendars.
- G2 users highlight that Microsoft Teams has a more robust file sharing system, scoring 8.9, while Jitsi does not have a dedicated file sharing feature. Users report that Teams allows for easy collaboration on documents in real-time, which is a significant advantage for enterprise users.
- Users on G2 report that Jitsi shines in its ease of use, scoring 9.0 compared to Teams' 8.8. Reviewers mention that Jitsi's interface is straightforward, making it a preferred choice for small businesses and casual users who need quick access without extensive setup.
- Reviewers mention that Microsoft Teams provides better quality of support, with a score of 8.5, while Jitsi's support is rated lower at 7.9. Users report that Teams offers comprehensive resources and responsive customer service, which is crucial for larger organizations.
- Users say that Jitsi's browser application is rated at 8.8, slightly higher than Teams' 8.7, indicating that Jitsi may offer a more user-friendly experience for those who prefer not to download additional software. Reviewers mention that this flexibility is particularly appealing for quick meetings.
- Seamless integration with Exchange: Teams Essentials works with On-Premises or Hosted Exchange so that Office clients can get Teams in the cloud.
- Upgraded online meetings: Provide professional features like virtual backgrounds, screen sharing, and recording from any device for your clients.
- Fully-enabled dynamic chats: Keep conversations going internally or externally with continuous chat, searchable history, and in-app file sharing and collaboration.
It is a really good platform, and clearly very good when it comes to the issue of using it with fewer concerns about privacy and cost than other alternatives. It seems to do the job fine and is as good/bad as any of the other things I have used.
Each time a callers signal falters their screen goes black and when it returns, all callers windows are reconfigured/moved to a new position. Significant echo on the audio front.
What I like the best about Microsoft Teams is that I am able to control the computer of a person that I talked to, specially why they really need help about navigating on the program. This really helpful in facilitating the process during the operations.
Unfortunately, a lot of the things Lync can do are obscured by the user interface. It’s attractive enough and doesn’t look cluttered at first glance, but most of my attempts to do non-basic things involve hunting through icons and menus that are...
It is a really good platform, and clearly very good when it comes to the issue of using it with fewer concerns about privacy and cost than other alternatives. It seems to do the job fine and is as good/bad as any of the other things I have used.
What I like the best about Microsoft Teams is that I am able to control the computer of a person that I talked to, specially why they really need help about navigating on the program. This really helpful in facilitating the process during the operations.
Each time a callers signal falters their screen goes black and when it returns, all callers windows are reconfigured/moved to a new position. Significant echo on the audio front.
Unfortunately, a lot of the things Lync can do are obscured by the user interface. It’s attractive enough and doesn’t look cluttered at first glance, but most of my attempts to do non-basic things involve hunting through icons and menus that are...
