that it supports mac os's as well as microsoft, making it a more dynamic software for a bigger work environment
I don't like that our company's setup does not include voice and video. We end up using three different systems for one meeting -- one for voice, one for screen sharing, and one for video. That is more a factor of our corporate setup than the software's...
I like that it is so easy to share the computing device remotely, just by using giving the ID and password and voila, its interface is secure and very comfortable, sending files in actual time is effortless and the audio and video first-class is very high....
The biggest problem with TeamViewer is that when you are in the middle of a session, the connection is often cut off at any time, without any warning and with a good internet connection. This makes it virtually impossible to use TeamViewer for professional...
that it supports mac os's as well as microsoft, making it a more dynamic software for a bigger work environment
I like that it is so easy to share the computing device remotely, just by using giving the ID and password and voila, its interface is secure and very comfortable, sending files in actual time is effortless and the audio and video first-class is very high....
I don't like that our company's setup does not include voice and video. We end up using three different systems for one meeting -- one for voice, one for screen sharing, and one for video. That is more a factor of our corporate setup than the software's...
The biggest problem with TeamViewer is that when you are in the middle of a session, the connection is often cut off at any time, without any warning and with a good internet connection. This makes it virtually impossible to use TeamViewer for professional...