Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare JAMS and Stonebranch 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ActiveBatch
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
JSCAPE MFT Server
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RunMyJobs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (55.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$9,996.00 Per Year
No pricing available
JAMS
Star Rating
(218)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$9,996.00 Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 2 pricing plansStonebranch
Star Rating
(126)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (55.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about StonebranchSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that JAMS excels in providing a clear overview of job management, which has significantly transformed workflows for many users. One reviewer noted that it has simplified the process of running and managing jobs across servers, making it especially helpful during busy periods.
- Users say Stonebranch stands out for its robust automation capabilities, with many praising its ability to handle complex tasks across various systems, including Linux and Windows. Reviewers highlighted its effectiveness in creating detailed automation guides that enhance operational flexibility.
- According to verified reviews, JAMS offers a more user-friendly setup experience, with straightforward trigger configurations based on time or specific events. This ease of use has been a significant advantage for teams looking to streamline their job scheduling processes.
- Reviewers mention that while both products have similar ease of use ratings, Stonebranch shines in its ability to manage hybrid and cloud-based jobs effectively. Users appreciate its comprehensive scheduling features that ensure efficient workload distribution.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Stonebranch has a slight edge in quality of support, with users reporting high satisfaction levels. Many noted that the support team is responsive and knowledgeable, which is crucial for organizations relying on automation for critical tasks.
- Users indicate that JAMS has a stronger focus on mid-market needs, making it a better fit for smaller to medium-sized businesses. Its structured design and integration capabilities with Windows applications have been particularly well-received, allowing for seamless operations in those environments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
JAMS
Core
$9,996.00
Per Year
Perfect for small teams getting started with automation.
Core Integrations: PowerShell, SQL, Azure Data Factory, Python, & 20+ others.
- Full IT and data orchestration
- Cross-platform job scheduling
- Advanced workflow automation
Stonebranch
No pricing availableFree Trial
JAMS
Free Trial is available
Stonebranch
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
170
8.8
106
Ease of Use
8.6
172
8.6
108
Ease of Setup
8.5
137
8.2
84
Ease of Admin
8.6
109
8.4
77
Quality of Support
9.3
165
8.9
105
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
108
9.0
76
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
165
9.4
104
Features by Category
Automation
8.9
149
8.8
80
8.9
134
8.5
76
Feature Not Available
7.8
53
Administration
8.5
144
8.5
80
8.5
131
8.8
76
8.4
117
8.5
69
Feature Not Available
8.5
54
8.6
79
8.6
62
8.9
74
8.8
59
Functionality
9.3
140
9.2
84
8.4
111
8.5
76
8.1
73
8.3
59
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
6.4
15
6.5
17
6.8
16
7.2
16
6.7
15
8.0
19
6.8
15
6.8
15
6.4
15
6.6
16
6.3
14
6.7
16
6.9
14
6.9
16
Data Delivery
Not enough data
8.8
26
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
28
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
30
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
23
|
Verified
Functionality
Not enough data
6.9
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
30
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
29
|
Verified
Governance
Not enough data
9.0
28
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
27
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
25
|
Verified
Core Transfer Infrastructure - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
8.8
26
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Capabilities - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
8.6
30
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance Controls - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
9.0
28
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
27
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
25
|
Verified
Intelligent Automation & AI - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
9.2
11
Agentic AI - DataOps Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
Not enough data
7.7
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Monitoring and Management
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.5
10
Cloud Deployment
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Generative AI
Not enough data
7.1
7
Not enough data
6.9
7
Agentic AI - SAP Store
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
JAMS and Stonebranch are categorized as Workload Automation
Unique Categories
JAMS has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
JAMS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Stonebranch
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
16.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.9%
Insurance
7.0%
Banking
4.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.2%
Other
59.5%
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Insurance
11.7%
Computer Software
9.2%
Banking
9.2%
Retail
8.3%
Other
45.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
How to hold schedules of all the jobs ?
2 Comments
AC
JAMS has the option to use jobs to execute other jobs in a specific order, which allows you to hold schedules for all jobs.Read more
Can JAMS convert my existing batch jobs?
2 Comments
Official Response from JAMS
Yes. Conversion utilities for Windows Task Scheduler, SQL Server Agent, and Cron are included with JAMS.Read more
What is a JAMS Job?
2 Comments
RG
A JAMS job is a definition for a task to be performed. It can be triggered by the appearance of a file at a certain location, an email receipt, a date/time...Read more
Do you have pros and cons in upgrading stonebranch?
2 Comments
SS
No issues at all it's easy to do upgradations my checking the manuals.Read more
How do I know which products are launched every Year including all the releases.
1 Comment
SS
By checking Stonebranch sites all new products are launched there in every Six months.Read more
What is stonebranch?
1 Comment
Official Response from Stonebranch
Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated,...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
