Best Software for 2025 is now live!

Compare Control-M and JAMS

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Control-M
Control-M
Star Rating
(56)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Control-M
JAMS
JAMS
Star Rating
(183)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.5% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Free Trial is available
Learn more about JAMS
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Control-M excels in its "Real-Time Data Collection" feature, scoring a remarkable 9.7, which reviewers mention significantly enhances their ability to monitor workloads effectively. In contrast, JAMS Enterprise Job Scheduler, while still strong, has a lower score of 8.7 in "Data Distribution," indicating a potential gap in real-time data handling capabilities.
  • Reviewers mention that JAMS offers superior "Quality of Support," with a score of 9.5 compared to Control-M's 8.6. Users on G2 appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of JAMS' support team, which can be crucial for businesses relying on timely assistance.
  • G2 users highlight Control-M's robust "Job Scheduling" capabilities, both scoring 9.4, but users say that Control-M provides more advanced features for complex scheduling scenarios, making it a preferred choice for enterprises with intricate job dependencies.
  • Users report that JAMS shines in "Service Management," achieving a score of 9.0, which reviewers mention helps streamline operations and improve service delivery. Control-M, with a score of 8.4, may not offer the same level of service management features, potentially impacting user experience.
  • Reviewers mention that Control-M's "Proactive Workflow" feature, scoring 9.1, allows for better anticipation of issues before they arise, while JAMS, with a score of 9.0, provides solid but slightly less proactive capabilities, which could affect operational efficiency.
  • Users on G2 report that JAMS' "API / Integrations" score of 8.5 is slightly better than Control-M's 8.2, indicating that JAMS may offer more seamless integration options with other tools, which is a critical factor for businesses looking to enhance their automation processes.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Control-M
No pricing available
JAMS
30 day free trial
Free Trial
Learn more about JAMS
Free Trial
Control-M
No trial information available
JAMS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
45
9.1
136
Ease of Use
8.8
46
8.7
136
Ease of Setup
8.2
21
8.6
101
Ease of Admin
8.6
22
8.7
88
Quality of Support
8.6
42
9.5
132
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
23
9.4
86
Product Direction (% positive)
8.0
46
9.5
130
Features by Category
8.8
301
8.7
849
Automation
9.1
36
8.9
115
8.7
34
8.9
101
8.8
16
Feature Not Available
Administration
8.5
28
8.4
111
9.1
31
8.5
99
8.8
30
8.5
90
9.1
16
Feature Not Available
9.0
15
8.7
53
8.4
15
8.9
46
Functionality
9.4
36
9.4
109
8.2
28
8.5
81
8.4
16
8.3
44
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation Support - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Error Management - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance and Reporting - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Big Data Processing and DistributionHide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features
9.4
20
Not enough data
Database
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Processing
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Control-M
Control-M
JAMS
JAMS
Control-M and JAMS are categorized as Workload Automation
Unique Categories
JAMS
JAMS has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Control-M
Control-M
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
16.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
20.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
63.6%
JAMS
JAMS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
16.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
47.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
35.8%
Reviewers' Industry
Control-M
Control-M
Information Technology and Services
25.0%
Insurance
12.5%
Investment Banking
7.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.1%
Retail
5.4%
Other
42.9%
JAMS
JAMS
Financial Services
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
6.7%
Insurance
6.1%
Banking
5.6%
Computer Software
5.0%
Other
57.5%
Most Helpful Reviews
Control-M
Control-M
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Soumyadip R.
SR
Soumyadip R.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

The tool is very helpful for scheduling and running jobs, the interface is very user friendly and lightweight tool

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Insurance

Restarting jobs or processes from the software itself can be confusing

JAMS
JAMS
Most Helpful Favorable Review
MG
Mark G.
Verified User

JAMS Job Scheduler is one of the most helpful programs that I use. There are so many programs that must be run at specific times, and in specific order and JAMS does it all!

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Financial Services

Desktop user interface is clunky and flicker when scrolling, makes it hard to know if an input has been changed.

Alternatives
Control-M
Control-M Alternatives
Tidal Automation
Tidal Automation
Add Tidal Automation
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Add Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Add ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Snowflake
Snowflake
Add Snowflake
JAMS
JAMS Alternatives
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Add ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Stonebranch
Stonebranch
Add Stonebranch
Automic Automation
Automic Automation
Add Automic Automation
Redwood Software
Redwood Software
Add Redwood Software
Discussions
Control-M
Control-M Discussions
What does control-M software do?
1 comment
Satyanarayan S.
SS
I used it in banking requirrd to automate job and scheduler.Read more
Is Control-M an ETL tool?
1 comment
Lakshmi Harika V.
LV
Yes. Control-M is used for scheduling and monitoring the jobs in ETL.Read more
What is workflow in control-M?
1 comment
Lakshmi Harika V.
LV
Control-M Workflow Insights provides valuable dashboards that give users in-depth observability to continuously monitor and improve performance of the...Read more
JAMS
JAMS Discussions
How to hold schedules of all the jobs ?
2 comments
Adrian C.
AC
JAMS has the option to use jobs to execute other jobs in a specific order, which allows you to hold schedules for all jobs.Read more
Can JAMS convert my existing batch jobs?
2 comments
Official Response from JAMS
Yes. Conversion utilities for Windows Task Scheduler, SQL Server Agent, and Cron are included with JAMS.Read more
What is a JAMS Job?
2 comments
Rob G.
RG
A JAMS job is a description of a task that needs to be executed. It can be initiated by the presence of a file in a specific place, the receipt of an email,...Read more