Compare Confluence and Elium 
- Reviewers mention that Confluence excels in its versioning and version history feature, scoring an impressive 8.9, which allows teams to track changes effectively. In contrast, Elium's versioning capabilities are less robust, leading to a lower user satisfaction in this area.
- Users report that Confluence's content editor is highly rated at 8.8, providing a seamless experience for creating and editing documents. Elium, while functional, does not match this level of user satisfaction, indicating potential limitations in its editing capabilities.
- G2 users highlight that Confluence's knowledge sharing feature stands out with a score of 9.2, making it easier for teams to collaborate and share information. Elium, on the other hand, has a lower score in this area, suggesting that users may find it less effective for collaborative knowledge management.
- Users on G2 report that Confluence's import functionality is rated at 8.2, allowing for easy integration of existing documents. In contrast, Elium's import feature is significantly lower at 5.7, which may hinder users looking to transition from other platforms.
- Reviewers mention that Confluence's public vs private permissions feature is rated at 8.7, providing flexibility in content sharing. Elium's lower score of 7.3 indicates that users may face challenges in managing content visibility effectively.
- Users say that Confluence's notifications feature, rated at 8.5, keeps team members informed about updates and changes, enhancing collaboration. Elium's score of 7.3 suggests that users may not receive timely updates, which could impact team communication.
- Unlimited workspaces
- Rich content editor
- Page hierarchy and versioning
- Unlimited platform administrators
- Platform branding
- Custom domain
I like a lot of the macros offered and make use of several of them (I think we also have a few extra ones). I also like how you can integrate portions of JIRA and Balsamiq, using the macros, this comes in handy with my spec pages.
Search is a pain. The more questions are asked in Q&A, the more difficult it becomes to find what you want, because it seems like questions are prioritized over stable doc pages. Search seems to default to "or" so searching for "product feature" will show...
Interface is really user friendly, and correspond to Internet standard in 2018. Most users do not need training in order to use it. Tags and spaces can allow various profile to see only information they need to see, in a very easy-to-implement way.
lack of customization in design lack of filesharing to outbound targets lack of admin API documentation. lack of data export to our corporate websites
I like a lot of the macros offered and make use of several of them (I think we also have a few extra ones). I also like how you can integrate portions of JIRA and Balsamiq, using the macros, this comes in handy with my spec pages.
Interface is really user friendly, and correspond to Internet standard in 2018. Most users do not need training in order to use it. Tags and spaces can allow various profile to see only information they need to see, in a very easy-to-implement way.
Search is a pain. The more questions are asked in Q&A, the more difficult it becomes to find what you want, because it seems like questions are prioritized over stable doc pages. Search seems to default to "or" so searching for "product feature" will show...
lack of customization in design lack of filesharing to outbound targets lack of admin API documentation. lack of data export to our corporate websites
