Compare AMS360 and EZLynx 
- Users report that AMS360 excels in Claims Management with a score of 7.6, while EZLynx falls short at 6.7. Reviewers mention that AMS360's claims process is more streamlined and user-friendly, making it easier for agents to manage claims efficiently.
- Reviewers say that AMS360's Policy Management feature is highly rated at 8.8, compared to EZLynx's 8.6. Users on G2 highlight AMS360's comprehensive policy tracking and management capabilities, which help agents stay organized and informed.
- Users say that AMS360 offers superior Quality of Support with a score of 8.5, while EZLynx's support is rated at 7.9. Reviewers mention that AMS360's customer service is responsive and knowledgeable, providing timely assistance when needed.
- G2 users report that AMS360's Invoicing & Receipts feature is rated at 7.9, significantly better than EZLynx's 6.7. Users mention that AMS360 provides more robust invoicing options, making it easier to generate and manage invoices.
- Reviewers mention that both products have similar scores for Contact Management at 8.2, but users on G2 note that AMS360 offers more advanced features for tracking client interactions, which enhances relationship management.
- Users report that AMS360's Task Management feature is well-received with a score of 8.1, matching EZLynx's score. However, reviewers say that AMS360 provides better integration with other tools, making it easier to manage tasks across different platforms.
Very user friendly and good for the work I do, especially from claims point of view.
For Accounting use, AMS does not have the detailed functionality to provide cash on account reporting that can associate income received with statement reconciliations. Not having this feature requires offline tracking which creates a greater risk for...
Conceptually, the system has a lot great features and potential yet untapped. Workflow efficiency and marketing capabilities are very good with a upside huge potential 'IF'...
difficult to update passwords if you manage more than one agency, doesn't work with all carriers. does not always connect well and rates can be completely off kilter because of that.
Very user friendly and good for the work I do, especially from claims point of view.
Conceptually, the system has a lot great features and potential yet untapped. Workflow efficiency and marketing capabilities are very good with a upside huge potential 'IF'...
For Accounting use, AMS does not have the detailed functionality to provide cash on account reporting that can associate income received with statement reconciliations. Not having this feature requires offline tracking which creates a greater risk for...
difficult to update passwords if you manage more than one agency, doesn't work with all carriers. does not always connect well and rates can be completely off kilter because of that.
