Compare Algolia and Hawksearch 
- Users report that Algolia excels in Product Search with a score of 9.1, while Hawksearch trails behind at 8.5, indicating that Algolia provides a more efficient and effective search experience.
- Reviewers mention that Algolia's Indexing capabilities are highly rated at 9.1, making it easier for users to manage their data, whereas Hawksearch's score of 7.6 suggests a less intuitive process.
- G2 users highlight Algolia's superior Typo Tolerance with a score of 9.2, which enhances user experience by accommodating common spelling errors, while Hawksearch's score of 7.1 indicates a need for improvement in this area.
- Users on G2 appreciate Algolia's Product Recommendations feature, scoring 8.5, which helps in driving conversions, compared to Hawksearch's score of 8.2, suggesting that Algolia offers slightly better personalized suggestions.
- Reviewers say that Algolia's Ease of Setup is rated at 8.5, making it user-friendly for new adopters, while Hawksearch's lower score of 7.2 indicates a more complex setup process that may deter some users.
- Users report that Algolia's Quality of Support is rated at 8.9, reflecting a strong commitment to customer service, whereas Hawksearch's score of 8.4, while still good, suggests there may be room for improvement in their support offerings.
- Unlimited Applications Per User
- Integration with SFCC, Shopify, Magento
- Integration with Segment, Google Tag Manager
- 50k Monthly Searches
- 10k Records
- Implementation Included
The search results are accurate and are fast. The analytics for what queries are not getting results and what documents get the most hits is nice.
It is (apart from the speed) quite unsophisticated. The entire model is geared to get you to pay more, more, more; which is a bit sad. Bug reports are countered with "we can only fix that on an enterprise server" (which is $1500+ per month).
- The level of control over search results, and the merchandising/marketing potential of such control, is outstanding. - The ability for the engine to learn and "undersrtand what you are trying to accomplish" - Customization of your Search Results -...
We were initially told integration was super easy with Handlebars, then came to find we were the first users of Handlebars on BigCommerce. Lots of errors in the beginning that burned up our available hours and time. We were the ones troubleshooting and...
The search results are accurate and are fast. The analytics for what queries are not getting results and what documents get the most hits is nice.
- The level of control over search results, and the merchandising/marketing potential of such control, is outstanding. - The ability for the engine to learn and "undersrtand what you are trying to accomplish" - Customization of your Search Results -...
It is (apart from the speed) quite unsophisticated. The entire model is geared to get you to pay more, more, more; which is a bit sad. Bug reports are countered with "we can only fix that on an enterprise server" (which is $1500+ per month).
We were initially told integration was super easy with Handlebars, then came to find we were the first users of Handlebars on BigCommerce. Lots of errors in the beginning that burned up our available hours and time. We were the ones troubleshooting and...
