Compare Adobe Experience Manager and RWS Tridion Sites 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (44.2% of reviews)
Enterprise (47.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
No pricing available
Adobe Experience Manager
Star Rating
(328)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (44.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Learn more about Adobe Experience ManagerRWS Tridion Sites
Star Rating
(19)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about RWS Tridion SitesSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Adobe Experience Manager excels in Content Management with a score of 8.9, highlighting its robust capabilities in managing diverse content types effectively. In contrast, RWS Tridion Sites, while still strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.7, indicating it may not be as comprehensive in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Adobe Experience Manager's Analytics features, particularly in Campaign Tracking (8.2), provide detailed insights that help optimize marketing efforts. RWS Tridion Sites shines in Audience Insights (9.3), suggesting it offers superior understanding of user behavior.
- G2 users highlight the Asset Management capabilities of Adobe Experience Manager, scoring 9.0, which includes features like File Transformation and Digital Rights Management. RWS Tridion Sites, with a score of 8.7, is noted for its effective Portals and Sites management, but lacks some of the advanced asset features.
- Users on G2 report that Adobe Experience Manager's Content Creation Tools score of 8.6 is particularly beneficial for teams needing to produce high-quality content quickly. RWS Tridion Sites, while offering solid tools, scores slightly lower at 8.4, indicating a potential gap in speed or efficiency.
- Reviewers mention that Adobe Experience Manager's Support quality, with a score of 7.6, is generally reliable, but RWS Tridion Sites outperforms it with a score of 8.0, suggesting better customer service experiences.
- Users say that Adobe Experience Manager's Ease of Use score of 7.7 reflects a steeper learning curve compared to RWS Tridion Sites, which has a score of 7.9, indicating that users may find Tridion Sites more intuitive for new users.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Kontent.ai
(148)
Digital Asset Management
Visit Website
Sponsored
Air
(553)
Digital Asset Management
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Adobe Experience Manager
Adobe Experience Manager Sites
Contact Us
- Editable templates
- Intuitive WISYWIG interface
- Style system
RWS Tridion Sites
No pricing availableFree Trial
Adobe Experience Manager
No trial information availableRWS Tridion Sites
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
270
8.3
12
Ease of Use
7.7
272
7.9
12
Ease of Setup
7.5
111
7.4
9
Ease of Admin
7.6
92
7.8
9
Quality of Support
7.6
240
8.0
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
90
7.8
10
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
270
6.5
10
Features by Category
Interface and Performance
8.4
42
Not enough data
8.1
42
Not enough data
7.8
43
Not enough data
8.3
41
Not enough data
8.2
44
Not enough data
Asset Management
8.4
47
Not enough data
8.9
40
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.3
40
Not enough data
8.5
39
Not enough data
7.9
38
Not enough data
8.5
39
Not enough data
8.6
43
Not enough data
Media Types
8.3
41
Not enough data
8.2
38
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
Administration
8.4
49
Not enough data
8.4
46
Not enough data
7.9
43
Not enough data
7.8
39
Not enough data
8.2
48
Not enough data
Content
8.2
154
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
146
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
133
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
127
Not enough data
7.8
127
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
131
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
147
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.4
139
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
143
|
Verified
Not enough data
Design
7.2
130
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.5
125
Not enough data
7.6
134
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
144
|
Verified
Not enough data
Platform
7.5
109
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
117
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
128
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
138
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
121
Not enough data
8.1
116
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
116
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.5
109
|
Verified
Not enough data
Content Creation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Optimization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Logistics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.9
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Administration
8.8
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.2
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
11
|
Verified
Not enough data
Standards
8.8
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
11
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.3
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
Analytics
8.3
25
8.6
7
8.2
23
9.0
7
8.0
23
9.3
7
7.9
25
8.6
6
8.3
12
8.8
7
8.0
11
8.6
6
Content Management
8.6
28
8.6
7
9.0
27
8.7
9
8.6
25
9.0
8
Design & Development
7.1
21
8.3
7
7.1
20
8.3
7
8.3
26
7.8
6
Channels
8.3
29
Not enough data
8.1
29
Not enough data
8.1
27
Not enough data
Design
8.3
29
Not enough data
8.6
30
Not enough data
8.7
29
Not enough data
8.0
28
Not enough data
8.9
30
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Content Creation
8.7
57
|
Verified
Not enough data
Optimization
8.1
50
|
Verified
Not enough data
Visual UGC
7.9
15
Not enough data
7.9
16
Not enough data
7.7
16
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
Integrations
8.2
15
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.2
16
Not enough data
8.6
15
Not enough data
Support
8.2
14
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
Performance
7.7
14
Not enough data
7.8
13
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Adobe Experience Manager and RWS Tridion Sites are categorized as Digital Experience Platforms (DXP)
Unique Categories
Adobe Experience Manager is categorized as Customer Communications Management, Content Experience Platforms, User-Generated Content, Digital Governance, Web Content Management, and Digital Asset Management
RWS Tridion Sites has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Adobe Experience Manager
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
RWS Tridion Sites
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
11.0%
Marketing and Advertising
9.1%
Computer Software
7.5%
Financial Services
5.2%
Consumer Goods
3.9%
Other
63.3%
Information Technology and Services
29.4%
Airlines/Aviation
11.8%
Retail
5.9%
Pharmaceuticals
5.9%
Industrial Automation
5.9%
Other
41.2%
Most Helpful Reviews
Adobe Experience Manager
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Michele B.
Verified User in Food & Beverages
The functionality and capabilities of AEM are great for a diverse audience with complicated and varying access levels. Components are easy to add and configure, and meet all of our content needs. It is simple to add resources from the Digital Asset Manager...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Raymond T.
Verified User in Automotive
Platform requires engineers to set up templates. Templates are not straightforward to create.
RWS Tridion Sites
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Its agile methodologies Role based users and their access
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Industrial Automation
There are literally so many things to dislike. First, it's very slow; it's also very complex. It's a mess, no way to preview before you publish. It's just a very bad CMS overall and I would not recommend it.. and there are reasons why there are not many...
Michele B.
Verified User in Food & Beverages
The functionality and capabilities of AEM are great for a diverse audience with complicated and varying access levels. Components are easy to add and configure, and meet all of our content needs. It is simple to add resources from the Digital Asset Manager...
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Its agile methodologies Role based users and their access
Raymond T.
Verified User in Automotive
Platform requires engineers to set up templates. Templates are not straightforward to create.
Verified User in Industrial Automation
There are literally so many things to dislike. First, it's very slow; it's also very complex. It's a mess, no way to preview before you publish. It's just a very bad CMS overall and I would not recommend it.. and there are reasons why there are not many...
Alternatives
Discussions
Do you have any plan to improve it's scalability?
3 comments
JL
A couple of years ago Adobe was excited about AEM in the cloud SaaS, but this offering seems to have quietly gone away. We use AEM at Rackspace where we have...Read more
What is the best way to use
1 comment
MR
Adobe Experience Manager as a Cloud Service is the best way to use, which makes AEM SaaS.Read more
How to reduce the reindex time for large index
1 comment
MR
We can reduce the indexing time by creating Lucene Index.Read more
How do I get knowledge about schemas
1 comment
SR
The best way to learn schema creation is through the sdl tridion documentation.Read more
RWS Tridion Sites has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
