Compare Adobe Connect and Microsoft Teams 
- Users report that Adobe Connect excels in session recording with a score of 8.6, allowing for detailed playback of meetings, while Microsoft Teams, although strong, scores slightly lower at 8.9 for its recording capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Microsoft Teams shines in collaboration tools, particularly in screen sharing and presentations, scoring 9.0 and 9.1 respectively, which enhances real-time teamwork compared to Adobe Connect's scores of 8.6 and 8.7.
- G2 users highlight that Adobe Connect offers robust branding options with a score of 8.5, making it ideal for organizations that prioritize custom branding during virtual events, whereas Microsoft Teams focuses more on integration with other Microsoft products.
- Users on G2 indicate that Microsoft Teams provides superior ease of use and setup, scoring 8.8 and 8.9 respectively, which reviewers say makes it more accessible for new users compared to Adobe Connect's scores of 8.0 and 7.7.
- Reviewers mention that Adobe Connect's role-based access feature, scoring 8.6, allows for better control over participant permissions, which is crucial for larger meetings, while Microsoft Teams also performs well but does not emphasize this feature as strongly.
- Users say that Microsoft Teams' mobile application is rated highly at 8.8, providing a seamless experience for users on the go, while Adobe Connect's mobile experience is rated lower at 8.0, indicating a potential area for improvement.
- Get all functionalities, try it free for 30 days!
- Seamless integration with Exchange: Teams Essentials works with On-Premises or Hosted Exchange so that Office clients can get Teams in the cloud.
- Upgraded online meetings: Provide professional features like virtual backgrounds, screen sharing, and recording from any device for your clients.
- Fully-enabled dynamic chats: Keep conversations going internally or externally with continuous chat, searchable history, and in-app file sharing and collaboration.
So many things to like. 1. Persistent rooms - build your layout and add your content ONCE, and it will always be there, ready for your next virtual meeting without you having to rebuild and reload every time. If you are doing several meetings or training...
It's clunky, ugly UI, the video sharing is really low resolution, the audio quality is acceptable but not great, and the competition blows it away in terms of user experience. I'm usually the AV guy supporting it, and I get lots of calls about issues...
I like the fact that I can access the tool from everywhere - on my desktop and on my phone. It allows my to have multiple workspaces, so I can connect to my own organization as well as to the organizations of my customers. I think it is a good tool for all...
Unfortunately, a lot of the things Lync can do are obscured by the user interface. It’s attractive enough and doesn’t look cluttered at first glance, but most of my attempts to do non-basic things involve hunting through icons and menus that are...
So many things to like. 1. Persistent rooms - build your layout and add your content ONCE, and it will always be there, ready for your next virtual meeting without you having to rebuild and reload every time. If you are doing several meetings or training...
I like the fact that I can access the tool from everywhere - on my desktop and on my phone. It allows my to have multiple workspaces, so I can connect to my own organization as well as to the organizations of my customers. I think it is a good tool for all...
It's clunky, ugly UI, the video sharing is really low resolution, the audio quality is acceptable but not great, and the competition blows it away in terms of user experience. I'm usually the AV guy supporting it, and I get lots of calls about issues...
Unfortunately, a lot of the things Lync can do are obscured by the user interface. It’s attractive enough and doesn’t look cluttered at first glance, but most of my attempts to do non-basic things involve hunting through icons and menus that are...
