Avaliações e Detalhes do Produto de Action1

I like that it is very easy to setup and easy to use and is very generous with it's free plan that allows smaller companies to have the tools they need to secure and support their endpoints that they would not have otherwise. It's patch management works great and has lots of options for accepting or denying updates based on needs. it has good monitoring tools and remote access support options to quickly help end users when needed as well. It helps with device inventory as it tells you the hardware and software info of all devices connected to Action1. I highly recommend it to anyone that wants a simple and highly effective solution for Patch management and with the bonus of also having some basic RMM features. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

I can't think of any major downsides. I do wish it had built-in support for updating the MS 365 desktop apps without having to set it up and configure it manually, though their database is still quite good and growing all the time. Other than that I can't really think of any right now. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

The ability to sort systems into groups can help provide at a glance for Servers (Offsite) for instance. The granular control to segment the org into sub-orgs while not leveraged I could see remote tech managers being promoted to manage their locality in this manner. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

Remote client lacks some advanced options such as back-ground shell or ps live command interface to perform forensics for instance without disturbing active user. The performance has greatly improved so really only minor quibble it copy and pasting to and from local to remote. Likely a result of the remote client interface being web based (thus dependant on web browser lockdown/security measures to block off such clipboard access by default). The clipboard (ctrl-c and ctrl-v copy and pasting) is a bit uneven at least at first - the remote client seems to have a new menu option when right clicking to get around this...The ease and simplicity of the remote instance kick off from action1 dashboard could be streamlined - had to hunt for the link for a few moments and always seems awkward because it is invariably involves a scroll to the right to find it and the computer name doesnt stick on the left side so I lose my place sometimes. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

As the administrator responsible for managing 75 endpoints, we have been utilizing PDQ Deploy & Inventory, an on-premise solution. While this system has met our core requirements, our evolving needs necessitate the capability to manage and deploy updates to remote devices beyond our office network and VPN. Action1 has proven to be an ideal solution, offering significant cost savings and the ability to scale to 200 clients, exceeding our initial requirement.

Action1's free tier provides comprehensive functionality, surpassing our current system. Key features include a user-friendly dashboard, vulnerability assessments based on CVS data, and remote desktop capabilities.

Implementation was completed within a week with minimal issues, requiring only minor firewall adjustments to optimize performance.

I am pleased to report that Action1 is now an integral part of our daily operations, significantly streamlining our workflow and enhancing overall efficiency. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

While the web application is appreciated, the development of a mobile application would significantly enhance the platform's utility. A mobile application would facilitate the streamlined execution of brief tasks, report generation, deployment and updates, software installations, and remote assistance to colleagues, eliminating the requirement for a desktop computer in these scenarios.

Furthermore, certain features currently lack optimal implementation. Specifically, the absence of a native function to display the external IP address of an endpoint is noted.

Additionally, the Windows build version report page only presents a partial build number (e.g., 10.0.19045 instead of x.x.19045.5487), which hinders the ability to quickly assess the update status of an endpoint. Although alternative methods exist, the built-in reporting functionality should provide comprehensive information.

Finally, the current user interface does not support subgroups, a feature that was extensively utilized in PDQ Inventory. While groups can be employed as filters, the absence of visual subgrouping limits organizational capabilities. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

Its easy to use with many fetures, beyond Patch Management, that work more than good enouh considering that they come as an extra to the main purpose wich is the patch management. It was not hard to automatically deploy in a domain enviroment, and equaly easy on the individual satelite clients. The free trial of up to 200 devices is a great way to get you started and get you addicted. The installed agent is extremely lightweight and amazingly fast to execute instructions. It can be used to deploy propriety software in addition to the included library very easily. Customer service is polite and understanding. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

As its lacking some features of a complete RMM solution, it should only be considered as an additional tool in the quest of a complete management suite. More features would be welcome, like inventory, tickets and SNMP monitoring. Also it seems to get confused with Chrome versioning and updates. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

We were particularly impressed by the reliable and efficient performance in patch management. [Product Name] enables a structured and secure management of updates, ensuring that systems remain consistently up-to-date while minimizing security risks.

Furthermore, the application is intuitive to use, eliminating the need for extensive training. The integration into existing systems is seamless, making the onboarding process significantly easier.

Another advantage is the low learning curve – even inexperienced users can quickly find their way around. Add Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

We have little to criticize about the product. However, one area for improvement is the graphical user interface, which has some minor inconsistencies that could be refined. Additionally, the reporting functionality still requires optimization to ensure that reports fully meet the needs of decision-makers. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

Action1 is incredibly easy to set up and configure. The free 200 endpoints allowed our organization to try Action1 out without risk or hassle. The feature set of Action1 is beyond that of just a patch manager and is incredibly useful for cutting down the amount of SAS products we pay for yearly. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

Currently, the only downside for us is the lack of Linux support, but I hear they are actively working on this feature, and it is one of their higher priorities. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

I've used other RMM options, and Action one checks all the boxes while also being free. I work at a small charter school, so budget is always an issue when it comes to rolling out new software. Having the ability to remotely manage, inventory, and push updates to the staff computers makes my job so much easier. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

I haven't run into any major issues. There's some clunkyness to the UI that I would like to see change, but really that's about it. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

The single pane of glass for managing endpoints. From one portal we can view and report on vulnerabilities, approve and schedule Microsoft and 3rd party patches and updates, provide remote desktop support to end users and perform mass automated software installations. Action 1 has replaced several different servers and systems and, because it's free, has reduced our annual IT spend considerably. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

There is literally not a single downside to using this product, other than the guilt you may experience by getting so many features for free. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

The dashboard in the web interface is slick and easy to navigate. Patching works so well, we used to use manage engine endpoint central for patch management and action1 blows this out of the water. I cant state this enough, it just works.

Agent is very lightweight and fast to deploy

Screenshare via tightvnc is a nice feature too, supports many SSO implementations too

Customer support via discord is nice and easy, and the application is so easy to implment and automatic polcies are easy to integrate. We use it consistantly for our server patching now Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

MacOS client is a little barebones but still gets the job done

better filtering in the portal may be useful but is pretty good as it is Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

Action1 oferece uma interface muito mais moderna e intuitiva em comparação com o TeamViewer, o que facilita a navegação. Suas capacidades de gerenciamento de patches são mais robustas, permitindo um melhor agendamento e automação de atualizações. Ao contrário do TeamViewer, o Action1 oferece controle centralizado que simplifica o gerenciamento de múltiplos endpoints a partir de um único lugar. Os recursos de relatórios e conformidade também são mais detalhados, o que é crucial para o acompanhamento das operações de TI. Além disso, o Action1 é projetado com flexibilidade em mente, tornando-o uma ótima opção para ambientes de nuvem e híbridos. Enquanto o TeamViewer é ótimo para acesso remoto, o Action1 foca no gerenciamento proativo de endpoints, o que considero mais benéfico. No geral, o Action1 parece uma ferramenta mais completa para manter a infraestrutura de TI de forma eficiente. A capacidade de adicionar ao repositório também ajuda, já que nossa equipe não conseguiu fazer isso com o TeamViewer. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

A falta de suporte completo para servidores locais pode ser limitante para ambientes que dependem de repositórios centralizados para atualizações offline. Se o painel fosse mais personalizável, isso também ajudaria muito mais para fins de conformidade. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.