Ao avaliar as duas soluções, os revisores acharam ambas igualmente fáceis de usar e administrar. No entanto, Flipcause é mais fácil de configurar, enquanto Qgiv é mais fácil de fazer negócios em geral.
A Flipcause nos disse desde o início que eles conseguiriam reduzir nossas taxas de processamento para menos de 1% em média, devido à opção de os doadores cobrirem a taxa de processamento. Em mais de um ano trabalhando com a Flipcause, nossa taxa média está...
We are in the CRM beta portion. The ability to customize reports is virtually non-existant. Our contacts did not group together like the were in FileMaker Pro. You cannot pull reports with certain credentials, it has to be all or nothing. I understand it is...
Extremely user friendly and gives the option to create event sites.
It is not user friendly for creating new event tickets, the only way to create a new ticket is by cloning other tickets, which is not intuitive on the site. I have to create and recreate tickets for the same purpose almost every time I use the software.
A Flipcause nos disse desde o início que eles conseguiriam reduzir nossas taxas de processamento para menos de 1% em média, devido à opção de os doadores cobrirem a taxa de processamento. Em mais de um ano trabalhando com a Flipcause, nossa taxa média está...
Extremely user friendly and gives the option to create event sites.
We are in the CRM beta portion. The ability to customize reports is virtually non-existant. Our contacts did not group together like the were in FileMaker Pro. You cannot pull reports with certain credentials, it has to be all or nothing. I understand it is...
It is not user friendly for creating new event tickets, the only way to create a new ticket is by cloning other tickets, which is not intuitive on the site. I have to create and recreate tickets for the same purpose almost every time I use the software.