Compare Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop) and splose

At a Glance
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Star Rating
(251)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (87.7% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 Provider - Starting Price
Browse all 4 pricing plans
splose
splose
Star Rating
(219)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (92.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$30.00 1 per practitioner Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 2 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that splose excels in user satisfaction, boasting a higher overall rating compared to Tebra. Users appreciate splose's intuitive features, such as AI integration for note-taking, which enhances efficiency and streamlines workflows.
  • According to verified reviews, Tebra is recognized for its user-friendliness and seamless integration with other EHR software. Users highlight its ability to keep up with industry changes and provide robust support, making it a reliable choice for managing claims across multiple practices.
  • Reviewers mention that splose offers exceptional local support, making it easy to use on mobile devices. The presence of an AI bot for assistance is particularly praised, as it provides quick help when users encounter issues, enhancing the overall support experience.
  • Users say that Tebra serves as a strong backbone for medical billing operations, with many finding its ease of use particularly beneficial for onboarding new employees. This aspect is crucial for practices looking to streamline their administrative processes.
  • G2 reviewers highlight that splose's integration capabilities with other software solutions contribute to a more streamlined experience. Users appreciate features like voice dictation, which allows for quick and efficient clinical note-taking, further enhancing productivity.
  • According to recent feedback, Tebra's setup process is generally smooth, but some users feel it could improve in matching specific workflow needs. In contrast, splose's overall ease of use and setup is rated higher, indicating a more favorable experience for new users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Clinical Automation
Contact Us
1 Provider - Starting Price
Browse all 4 pricing plans
splose
splose AI
$30.00
1 per practitioner Per Month
Browse all 2 pricing plans
Free Trial
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
No trial information available
splose
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
210
9.0
163
Ease of Use
8.6
214
9.2
177
Ease of Setup
8.6
122
8.5
119
Ease of Admin
8.5
109
8.9
55
Quality of Support
7.6
207
9.7
162
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.2
109
9.4
55
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
207
10.0
170
Features by Category
Patient Relationship Management (PRM)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
9.1
15
Not enough data
Information Flow
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Patient Experience
8.6
13
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.7
13
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
Revenue Cycle ManagementHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
7.8
31
Not enough data
Clinical
8.0
27
Not enough data
7.8
27
Not enough data
7.6
24
Not enough data
Financial
7.7
28
Not enough data
7.8
28
Not enough data
8.2
29
Not enough data
HIPAA Compliant MessagingHide 8 FeaturesShow 8 Features
8.3
14
Not enough data
Platform
8.6
14
Not enough data
8.2
12
Not enough data
7.6
12
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
8.7
14
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
7.8
13
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
Healthcare Claims ManagementHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
8.2
51
Not enough data
Efficiency
8.3
44
Not enough data
8.4
46
Not enough data
8.1
46
Not enough data
8.2
47
Not enough data
Accuracy
8.0
46
Not enough data
8.6
48
Not enough data
8.1
46
Not enough data
Clinical DocumentationHide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
7.8
59
Not enough data
Operations
7.9
56
Not enough data
7.9
54
Not enough data
7.7
56
Not enough data
7.5
48
Not enough data
7.9
47
Not enough data
7.9
49
Not enough data
8.0
55
Not enough data
7.8
52
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.0
28
Not enough data
8.3
56
Not enough data
Clinical Workflow Management
8.3
46
Not enough data
8.5
41
Not enough data
7.8
44
Not enough data
8.2
53
Not enough data
Patient Health Information Management
8.6
50
Not enough data
8.0
48
Not enough data
8.2
49
Not enough data
Agentic AI - EHR
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.9
20
Not enough data
Patient Convenience
7.6
13
Not enough data
8.0
15
Not enough data
7.3
14
Not enough data
8.2
14
Not enough data
7.8
16
Not enough data
Administration
7.3
14
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
7.4
14
Not enough data
7.4
16
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
7.7
33
Not enough data
Patient-Centered Functions
8.4
29
Not enough data
8.5
30
Not enough data
7.5
16
Not enough data
8.0
28
Not enough data
6.7
13
Not enough data
Operations
8.0
15
Not enough data
7.7
22
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
7.3
15
Not enough data
8.2
28
Not enough data
7.5
22
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.0
10
Not enough data
Medical Practice ManagementHide 8 FeaturesShow 8 Features
7.7
58
8.8
164
Operations Management
7.6
48
9.1
146
7.4
49
9.0
154
7.5
48
8.6
148
7.2
44
8.8
132
Added Efficiencies
7.5
45
8.2
105
8.2
47
8.8
124
8.0
39
8.8
137
8.0
49
9.1
138
8.6
9
Not enough data
Technology
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
Administration
7.4
7
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Compliance
9.8
9
Not enough data
9.8
9
Not enough data
7.1
10
Not enough data
Computer-Assisted Coding - Medical Coding
6.9
9
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
6.1
9
Not enough data
Admin and Tech Workflows - Medical Coding
7.0
9
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Medical Billing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
splose
splose
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop) and splose are categorized as Medical Practice Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
87.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
11.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
1.2%
splose
splose
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
92.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
8.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
0%
Reviewers' Industry
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Medical Practice
38.5%
Hospital & Health Care
25.8%
Mental Health Care
14.3%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
9.4%
Alternative Medicine
2.5%
Other
9.4%
splose
splose
Health, Wellness and Fitness
40.8%
Hospital & Health Care
29.4%
Mental Health Care
13.9%
Medical Practice
9.5%
Civic & Social Organization
1.5%
Other
5.0%
Alternatives
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop) Alternatives
WebPT
WebPT
Add WebPT
NextGen Healthcare EHR
NextGen Healthcare EHR
Add NextGen Healthcare EHR
DrChrono by EverHealth.
DrChrono by EverHealth
Add DrChrono by EverHealth.
SimplePractice
SimplePractice
Add SimplePractice
splose
splose Alternatives
Zanda (formerly Power Diary)
Zanda (formerly Power Diary)
Add Zanda (formerly Power Diary)
Pabau Practice Management
Pabau Practice Management
Add Pabau Practice Management
Epic
Epic
Add Epic
Carepatron
Carepatron
Add Carepatron
Discussions
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop) Discussions
W
2 Comments
John W.
JW
How much did PatientPop pay you to write a positive review?Read more
Can I process credit card payments from patients using Kareo?
1 Comment
Karen H.
KH
Yes you can.Read more
Kareo system down again
1 Comment
JK
Not surprising at all. Read more
splose
splose Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
splose has no discussions with answers