Compare RawTherapee and Zoner Photo Studio X 
- Users report that RawTherapee excels in its advanced editing capabilities, particularly with features like the "Advanced Color Editor" and "Batch Processing," which allow for detailed adjustments and efficient workflow management. In contrast, Zoner Photo Studio X is noted for its user-friendly interface, making it easier for beginners to navigate, but it lacks some of the depth in editing tools that RawTherapee offers.
- Reviewers mention that RawTherapee has a higher G2 rating for meeting requirements (8.8) compared to Zoner Photo Studio X (7.6), indicating that users feel RawTherapee better fulfills their needs for professional photo editing.
- G2 users highlight that RawTherapee's product direction is rated significantly higher (9.4) than Zoner Photo Studio X (4.7), suggesting that users are more optimistic about RawTherapee's future updates and enhancements, which may lead to better long-term value.
- Users on G2 report that while both products have quality support, RawTherapee (8.3) slightly edges out Zoner Photo Studio X (8.0) in terms of user satisfaction with support services, indicating a more reliable assistance experience for RawTherapee users.
- Reviewers mention that RawTherapee's ease of use rating (8.3) is higher than that of Zoner Photo Studio X (7.0), suggesting that while Zoner is more beginner-friendly, RawTherapee offers a more robust set of features for those willing to invest time in learning the software.
- Users say that RawTherapee's strong community support and extensive documentation are significant advantages, providing users with resources to maximize their use of the software, whereas Zoner Photo Studio X, while having a smaller user base, offers a more guided experience for new users.
It is ideal, I decided to try it to know what quality it offered in the photos and the raw development and without a doubt be impressed, the most attractive feature is that it has support for Windows, Linux and Mac systems, which makes it a perfectly...
It's clunky and slower than I would like. Not as intuitive as I'd prefer it to be.
It is really a program that contributes a lot to the photographers, it is a complement that all the people that love and work with the photography should use, allows that the works that we have take more quality thanks to all the functions of edition and...
i do not like how "outdated" the software looks. Most of the programs i run are very visually stunning like the updated Lightroom.
It is ideal, I decided to try it to know what quality it offered in the photos and the raw development and without a doubt be impressed, the most attractive feature is that it has support for Windows, Linux and Mac systems, which makes it a perfectly...
It is really a program that contributes a lot to the photographers, it is a complement that all the people that love and work with the photography should use, allows that the works that we have take more quality thanks to all the functions of edition and...
It's clunky and slower than I would like. Not as intuitive as I'd prefer it to be.
i do not like how "outdated" the software looks. Most of the programs i run are very visually stunning like the updated Lightroom.
