Compare QorusDocs and Upland Qvidian 
- Reviewers mention that Upland Qvidian excels in its "Quality of Support," scoring 8.9, which is notably higher than QorusDocs' 9.4. Users appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, making it a reliable choice for enterprises needing assistance.
- Users report that QorusDocs offers superior "Online Document Creation" capabilities, with a score of 8.5 compared to Upland Qvidian's 7.6. This feature allows for a more seamless and collaborative document creation process, which is crucial for teams working remotely.
- G2 users highlight that Upland Qvidian's "Content Storage" feature is robust, scoring 9.0, which allows for efficient management of large volumes of documents. In contrast, QorusDocs, while still strong, scores slightly lower in this area, indicating a potential gap for users with extensive content needs.
- Users on G2 mention that QorusDocs shines in "Collaborative Creation," achieving a score of 8.5, which is significantly higher than Upland Qvidian's 7.5. This feature is essential for teams that require real-time collaboration on proposals and documents.
- Reviewers say that Upland Qvidian's "RFP Generation" capabilities, particularly in "Versioning," score 7.7, while QorusDocs excels with a score of 8.8. This indicates that QorusDocs provides a more effective way to manage document revisions, which is critical for maintaining accuracy in proposals.
- Users report that QorusDocs has a more user-friendly "Document Builder Interface," scoring 8.5 compared to Upland Qvidian's 7.2. This ease of use is a significant factor for teams looking to streamline their document creation processes without extensive training.
The integration of our material and process was key to getting the team on board during the implementation phase of the project.
Slow, buggy, requires tons of logging in, restarting, etc. Doesn't process images or formatting well in Word. Seemingly constant issues with SSO. Only works on expired browser.
Qvidian Proposal Automation (QPA) is an excellent content repository. It's browser-based cloud library is excellent for organizations who have workforces who occasionally work remotely without direct access to a network drive. The user-interface is...
The new style of the Library. The font is too big and cannot adjust seveal useful columns at once. The comments section is difficult to read and I used it a lot before. The setup of the documents (architecture) is also very complex and difficult on your own.
The integration of our material and process was key to getting the team on board during the implementation phase of the project.
Qvidian Proposal Automation (QPA) is an excellent content repository. It's browser-based cloud library is excellent for organizations who have workforces who occasionally work remotely without direct access to a network drive. The user-interface is...
Slow, buggy, requires tons of logging in, restarting, etc. Doesn't process images or formatting well in Word. Seemingly constant issues with SSO. Only works on expired browser.
The new style of the Library. The font is too big and cannot adjust seveal useful columns at once. The comments section is difficult to read and I used it a lot before. The setup of the documents (architecture) is also very complex and difficult on your own.
