Compare QorusDocs and Responsive, formerly RFPIO 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (49.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (50.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
QorusDocs
Star Rating
(167)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (49.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about QorusDocsResponsive, formerly RFPIO
Star Rating
(1,127)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Responsive, formerly RFPIOSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that QorusDocs excels in "Quality of Support" with a score of 9.4, which reviewers mention as a significant advantage, highlighting responsive customer service and helpful resources. In contrast, Responsive, formerly RFPIO, has a slightly lower score of 9.2, indicating good support but not as highly rated.
- Reviewers mention that QorusDocs offers a more user-friendly "Ease of Setup" with a score of 7.5, while Responsive shines in "Ease of Use" with a score of 8.7, suggesting that once set up, users find Responsive easier to navigate and utilize effectively.
- G2 users highlight QorusDocs' strong "Document Creation" capabilities, particularly in "Online Document Creation" with a score of 8.5, which reviewers say allows for seamless collaboration. Responsive, however, has a slightly lower score of 8.3 in this area, indicating room for improvement in online document functionalities.
- Users on G2 report that QorusDocs has a robust "Versioning" feature with a score of 8.8, which reviewers mention is crucial for tracking changes in documents. Responsive, with a score of 8.1, may not provide the same level of detail in version control, which could be a drawback for teams needing meticulous document management.
- Reviewers say that QorusDocs' "Content Management" features, particularly "Content Import" and "Content Storage," score impressively at 8.8 and 9.0 respectively, making it easier for users to manage and retrieve documents. In comparison, Responsive's scores in these areas are lower, indicating potential challenges in content management efficiency.
- Users report that Responsive, formerly RFPIO, has a stronger "Collaborative Creation" feature with a score of 8.9, which reviewers mention enhances teamwork during document preparation. QorusDocs, while still strong at 8.5, may not offer the same level of collaborative tools, making Responsive a better choice for teams focused on joint document efforts.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Conveyor
(98)
Sales Enablement
Visit Website
Sponsored
Dock
(138)
Sales Enablement
Visit Website
Sponsored
Inventive.AI
(5)
Sales Enablement
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
QorusDocs
No pricing availableResponsive, formerly RFPIO
No pricing availableFree Trial
QorusDocs
No trial information availableResponsive, formerly RFPIO
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
126
8.9
919
Ease of Use
8.4
125
8.7
933
Ease of Setup
7.5
77
8.7
521
Ease of Admin
8.2
75
8.8
487
Quality of Support
9.4
117
9.2
822
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
74
9.3
475
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
118
9.0
888
Features by Category
Document Creation
8.2
66
|
Verified
8.4
416
|
Verified
8.3
68
|
Verified
8.1
405
|
Verified
8.0
53
|
Verified
7.9
371
|
Verified
8.5
61
|
Verified
8.2
353
|
Verified
8.4
56
|
Verified
8.1
320
|
Verified
8.2
63
|
Verified
8.2
352
|
Verified
Workflow
8.4
57
|
Verified
8.2
377
|
Verified
8.6
59
|
Verified
8.9
410
|
Verified
8.3
50
|
Verified
8.6
390
|
Verified
Analytics
8.2
44
|
Verified
8.3
319
|
Verified
7.9
44
|
Verified
8.3
354
|
Verified
7.8
57
|
Verified
8.5
405
|
Verified
Administration and Platform
8.6
74
|
Verified
8.9
441
|
Verified
8.1
61
|
Verified
8.5
431
|
Verified
8.1
36
|
Verified
7.7
277
|
Verified
7.3
25
|
Verified
7.6
195
|
Verified
7.0
23
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
8.1
30
|
Verified
7.7
211
|
Verified
Generative AI
7.3
18
7.4
96
RFP Generation
8.5
41
7.6
422
8.1
27
8.3
411
8.8
31
8.1
402
7.9
38
8.9
527
RFP Distribution
8.2
25
8.3
428
7.9
22
7.7
405
8.0
27
8.0
407
Submissions
8.1
41
8.9
499
8.6
45
8.9
520
8.3
31
8.6
481
8.1
25
7.8
311
RFP Response
7.9
26
8.5
421
8.6
53
8.8
477
8.5
41
8.7
459
8.0
27
7.6
316
8.4
29
8.1
323
7.9
26
8.0
318
Data Sources
8.7
19
8.2
102
8.4
15
8.0
104
8.8
26
8.5
106
Generation
8.8
24
8.1
104
8.5
18
8.3
104
8.3
20
8.1
99
Delivery
7.8
16
8.5
99
7.7
11
8.2
93
8.1
8
8.0
82
Generative AI
7.7
8
7.7
63
7.7
8
7.7
61
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Functionality
Not enough data
7.5
90
Not enough data
7.7
88
Not enough data
8.0
102
Not enough data
8.6
121
Risk assessment
Not enough data
7.2
85
Not enough data
6.8
82
Not enough data
7.9
94
Supplier Marketplace
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Contract Management
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Data Collection
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Project Management
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Content Management
8.9
27
Not enough data
8.9
29
Not enough data
8.9
29
Not enough data
8.3
31
Not enough data
9.1
30
Not enough data
Analytics
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
Presentation
8.3
13
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
QorusDocs and Responsive, formerly RFPIO are categorized as RFP, Proposal, and Document Generation
Unique Categories
QorusDocs is categorized as Sales Enablement
Responsive, formerly RFPIO is categorized as Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment, Salesforce AppExchange Apps, and Strategic Sourcing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
QorusDocs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Responsive, formerly RFPIO
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
20.6%
Computer Software
7.3%
Staffing and Recruiting
6.1%
Legal Services
6.1%
Consulting
4.2%
Other
55.8%
Computer Software
23.8%
Information Technology and Services
19.8%
Financial Services
7.4%
Insurance
5.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.8%
Other
38.9%
Most Helpful Reviews
QorusDocs
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Financial Services
Our onboarding/training rep, Marco Epstein, was great. He was knowledgeable, professional, and of course, personable. Additionally, the Qorus team worked with us to highly customize their software package to our specific needs.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
We are still implementing it so there are a few issues but once they are improved, it should be good.
Responsive, formerly RFPIO
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Brian Z.
Verified User in Computer Software
RFPIO's answer library is intuitive and impressive. When responding to imported RFP questions, answer recommendations automatically populate as "suggestions" directly from the answer library. In RFP mode, you do not have to search - RFPIO instantly...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Financial Services
Auto-respond is useless. Rarely finds an appropriate response. Even the response recommendations are rarely applicable.
Verified User in Financial Services
Our onboarding/training rep, Marco Epstein, was great. He was knowledgeable, professional, and of course, personable. Additionally, the Qorus team worked with us to highly customize their software package to our specific needs.
Brian Z.
Verified User in Computer Software
RFPIO's answer library is intuitive and impressive. When responding to imported RFP questions, answer recommendations automatically populate as "suggestions" directly from the answer library. In RFP mode, you do not have to search - RFPIO instantly...
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
We are still implementing it so there are a few issues but once they are improved, it should be good.
Verified User in Financial Services
Auto-respond is useless. Rarely finds an appropriate response. Even the response recommendations are rarely applicable.
Discussions
If i think that the marketing content is lacking should i contact the qorus team?
2 comments
AQ
This isn't really a question about Qorus.Read more
How do I make use of MSFT Coretex for knowledge management?
1 comment
AQ
This isn't really a question about Qorus.Read more
Why do features in Qorus Add-in differ for Word documents and PowerPoint documents ?
1 comment
AH
Hi Shruti,
We appreciate you sending this question along. The QorusDocs Insert feature for Word is one of the most used and beloved content actions made...Read more
What format of RFPs and security questionnaires does RFPIO support for importing?
1 comment
MW
Users can import Excel, Word, and pdf files onto the RFPIO platform.Read more
Can the response be exported into the source file?
1 comment
MW
Yes, it can!
Users can import the file onto the RFPIO platform, collaborate with their team to answer questions on the platform, and then export all the...Read more
What 3rd party tools can RFPIO integrate with?
1 comment
MW
RFPIO supports integrations with 17 different tools, including CRM Connectors, Cloud Storage, SSO Authentication, and Communication Tools.
Popular...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
