When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found them equally easy to use, and both vendors make it equally easy to do business overall. However, Plastic SCM is easier to set up, while Wrike is easier to administer.
Reviewers felt that Wrike meets the needs of their business better than Plastic SCM.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, Plastic SCM and Wrike provide similar levels of assistance.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Wrike over Plastic SCM.
You've probably heard of concepts like bug branches, topic branches, and so on, right? Ok, even if you haven't, here's the answer: it's a branch you use to...Read more
But aren't branches supposed to be evil incarnate?
1 Comment
Official Response from Plastic SCM
Who told you that? I bet you found that on some Subversion guide, forum, or manual, maybe even on some other SCM website, didn't you? Branches are...Read more
What's Plastic SCM?
1 Comment
Official Response from Plastic SCM
Plastic is a version control system: it versions files and directories and keeps track of branching and merging as you've never seen before. And even better?...Read more
Wrike is a scaleable project management tool.
From Wrike: "Wrike is a SaaS-based, work management platform features
engaging collaboration, workflow and...Read more
Are there additional capabilities beyond project management? Seems like it going through this review process.
9 Comments
CM
1) Wrike Forms has allow us to assess all project requests submitted by stakeholders, allowing us to pull the right team and understand the needs of the...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.