Wrike Pricing Overview
Wrike at a glance
Wrike offers a free version for unlimited users with an unlimited number of outside collaborators who can view tasks that are shared with them. Paid plans start from $10/user/month. Every paid plan begins with a 15-day trial period to make sure Wrike is right for you.
| Name | Price | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0.00 | A simple, shared task list for small teams.
|
| Team | $10.00 | 5 to 200 users.
Full project planning & collaboration
|
| Business | $25.00 | 5-200 users.
Volume discounts available
Robust work management with customization & exec reporting
|
| Enterprise | Contact Us | Comprehensive solution with advanced security & controls
|
| Pinnacle | Contact Us | Ideal for larger businesses that require robust reporting, digital asset management, and security software.
|
Wrike pricing & plans
Wrike Pricing Reviews
What I liked best about this tool was how quickly you can get going, even with deploying quite rapidly to solve the needs of an entire creative team at my organization. I was able to get the tool going and perform some pretty complex workflow automation in a brief period. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I have given feedback to the product team regarding the iOS and iPadOS apps. They are solid for a quick reply to work items my colleagues tag me on, updating project and task notes, and updating statuses. However, I feel there is a mountain of possibility with integrating some of the web app features into the mobile version of the platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Our group has utilized the Enterprise Standard arrangement of a project management platform. We have found that it permits customization to meet our team's particular needs. Having the option to change workflows and views to coordinate with our objectives is helpful for maintaining efficiency.
However, it merits observing that our involvement depends on a plan that does not have a portion of the further developed features accessible in higher tier plans. So we have not had the chance to investigate the full scope of capacities.
For groups not firmly following nimble techniques, this stage emerges for its simplicity of use. It empowers clear task following and project management without a steep expectation to learn and adapt. This makes it simple for colleagues to rapidly get up to speed and contribute without getting slowed down by complex cycles. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
For groups utilizing agile methodologies, there are zones that could potentially be improved in this platform:
Absence of Embedded Agile Capabilities: Our team has noted that inherent features explicitly intended for agile reporting, tracking, and versioning are not present. This requires investing extra time to adjust the platform to viably support agile practices.
Continuing Development: It is evident that the stage is as yet developing and adjusting. Moving from an item-driven task tracking arrangement to one that completely receives agile SDLC standards is an progressing procedure. Further development is expected to address the complex needs of agile groups in a thorough manner.
The objective is to give constructive feedback while avoiding charged language that could be seen as overly negative or critical. Please let me know if this revised version better achieves a neutral tone. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
