When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Red Hat OpenShift easier to use, administer, and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of set up with OpenText SiteScope.
I'm monitoring many applications such as Ping tracking, Database query tracking, URL tracking without agency
The software needs to be restarted frequently.
What I like most is the support having to deploy applications in different programming languages. Besides having different database handlers and additional tools like cron
The user interface could more more user friendly. Sometimes deploying servers could be quite slow and bugs appear in the control panel where webpages were not properly redirected to. However, reporting it to the support team seemed to have fixed this issue .
I'm monitoring many applications such as Ping tracking, Database query tracking, URL tracking without agency
What I like most is the support having to deploy applications in different programming languages. Besides having different database handlers and additional tools like cron
The software needs to be restarted frequently.
The user interface could more more user friendly. Sometimes deploying servers could be quite slow and bugs appear in the control panel where webpages were not properly redirected to. However, reporting it to the support team seemed to have fixed this issue .