Compare Monster and ZipRecruiter 
- Users report that ZipRecruiter excels in ease of use with a score of 9.6, while Monster, with a score of 9.1, is noted to have a slightly steeper learning curve. Reviewers mention that ZipRecruiter's intuitive interface makes it easier for small businesses to navigate and utilize effectively.
- Reviewers say that ZipRecruiter's performance rating of 9.3 stands out, particularly in its ability to deliver quality candidates quickly. In contrast, Monster's performance score of 8.9 indicates that while it is effective, it may not match the speed and efficiency that ZipRecruiter offers.
- Users on G2 highlight ZipRecruiter's superior automation features, scoring 9.0, which streamline the hiring process significantly. Monster, with a score of 8.4, is seen as less automated, requiring more manual input from users, which can slow down the recruitment process.
- G2 users mention that ZipRecruiter's reporting capabilities, rated at 8.8, provide valuable insights into hiring trends and candidate engagement. Monster's reporting score of 8.3 suggests it may lack some of the depth and clarity that users find beneficial in ZipRecruiter's analytics.
- Reviewers mention that ZipRecruiter's integration APIs score of 8.5 allows for seamless connectivity with other HR tools, enhancing its functionality. In comparison, Monster's higher score of 8.8 indicates it may offer more robust integration options, but users report that the overall experience with ZipRecruiter's integrations is more user-friendly.
- Users say that ZipRecruiter's marketing tools, rated at 8.8, are particularly effective in reaching a wider audience, which is crucial for small businesses. Monster's score of 8.6 suggests it has solid marketing capabilities, but users feel that ZipRecruiter's tools are more impactful in driving candidate engagement.
power search option is useful. profile view in the same window is good.
I started noticing way more fake resumes with fake contact details, which wastes time. Monsters still show candidates' resumes who retired or asked to remove their profile from their portal.
I found that Zip Recruiter had a wealth of jobseekers with the necessary qualifications. I liked that you would look at these candidates and contact them thru the Zip Recruiter news portal. Don't get me started on the preliminary questions which are a god...
Their billing practices are shady and dishonest. They do not warn you about trial periods ending, they will not notify you upon your billing starting, and they are absolutely unwilling to rectify any billing errors no matter the financial impact on those...
power search option is useful. profile view in the same window is good.
I found that Zip Recruiter had a wealth of jobseekers with the necessary qualifications. I liked that you would look at these candidates and contact them thru the Zip Recruiter news portal. Don't get me started on the preliminary questions which are a god...
I started noticing way more fake resumes with fake contact details, which wastes time. Monsters still show candidates' resumes who retired or asked to remove their profile from their portal.
Their billing practices are shady and dishonest. They do not warn you about trial periods ending, they will not notify you upon your billing starting, and they are absolutely unwilling to rectify any billing errors no matter the financial impact on those...
