Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...
It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.
Integration with MS environment, easy on the interface because of the similarities in screens and icons usage with other MS softwares. In addition, we can contribute to the project simultaneously with other users this is best thing.
MS Project Server has room to grow in the risk management/decision tools area. The present libraries are enhanced SharePoint lists and not integrated in the schedule and decision/driver libraries. Overall I would give this service a B.
Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...
Integration with MS environment, easy on the interface because of the similarities in screens and icons usage with other MS softwares. In addition, we can contribute to the project simultaneously with other users this is best thing.
It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.
MS Project Server has room to grow in the risk management/decision tools area. The present libraries are enhanced SharePoint lists and not integrated in the schedule and decision/driver libraries. Overall I would give this service a B.