- Home
- ...
- E-commerce Fraud Protection Software
- Mastercard Identity Review 360
- Pipl
- Mastercard Identity Review 360-vs-Pipl
Compare Mastercard Identity Review 360 and Pipl 
- Reviewers mention that Pipl excels in its Fraud Detection capabilities, scoring an impressive 9.5, which users attribute to its comprehensive database and effective algorithms that identify fraudulent activities swiftly.
- Users report that Ekata shines in Real-Time Monitoring, achieving a score of 9.3, with many highlighting its ability to provide immediate alerts and updates, which is crucial for businesses needing to act quickly on potential threats.
- G2 users note that both products have similar scores in Quality of Support, with both Pipl and Ekata scoring 9.1, indicating that users feel well-supported by both companies when issues arise.
- Users on G2 mention that Pipl's Transaction Scoring feature is particularly robust, scoring 9.5, and reviewers appreciate how it helps in assessing the risk level of transactions effectively.
- Reviewers say that Ekata's Risk Assessment feature, with a score of 9.4, is praised for its detailed insights and analytics, allowing businesses to make informed decisions based on comprehensive data analysis.
- Users report that while both products offer Bot Mitigation, Pipl scores slightly lower at 9.0 compared to Ekata, which has a more advanced system in place, leading to better protection against automated threats.
We heavily rely on the score given by Ekata, has allowed us to reduce our review rate, false positives and catch bad actors faster and easier. The insight on emails, addresses is very comprehensive. Integrating with their API is easy and intuitive, even...
The risk score isn't always accurate. Certain characteristics are prevalent, yet they will have an excessive impact on the risk score. When calculating risk scores with information, there should be both primary and secondary considerations.
PIPL is always our "go-to first" resource. The data we get has always proven to be comprehensive, highly reliable, and helps our analysts focus their efforts on just the right areas. PIPL is a core part of our operations.
The email address section is nearly always outdated. The information provided is not the best.
We heavily rely on the score given by Ekata, has allowed us to reduce our review rate, false positives and catch bad actors faster and easier. The insight on emails, addresses is very comprehensive. Integrating with their API is easy and intuitive, even...
PIPL is always our "go-to first" resource. The data we get has always proven to be comprehensive, highly reliable, and helps our analysts focus their efforts on just the right areas. PIPL is a core part of our operations.
The risk score isn't always accurate. Certain characteristics are prevalent, yet they will have an excessive impact on the risk score. When calculating risk scores with information, there should be both primary and secondary considerations.
The email address section is nearly always outdated. The information provided is not the best.
