When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Upland FileBound easier to use and administer. However, reviewers felt that M-Files was easier to do business with overall. Finally, reviewers felt that the products are equally easy to set up.
We're really just getting started with the product, but have found it to be extremely easy to set up and use. Over a period of three days, I imported about 20,000 files from our server, using provided tools to associate metadata culled from a connected...
The application interface is not user-friendly at all. A learning period must pass before you can use the app. However, it can be challenging to make sense of errors. We are unable to access the data on the created external user requests.
FileBound offers a tremendous amount of functionality at entry level cost. The features contained in FileBound are extremely useful for automating a variety of document based processes but these features are usually only found in extremely expensive...
If not used correctly, FileBound can be difficult to use and navigate
We're really just getting started with the product, but have found it to be extremely easy to set up and use. Over a period of three days, I imported about 20,000 files from our server, using provided tools to associate metadata culled from a connected...
FileBound offers a tremendous amount of functionality at entry level cost. The features contained in FileBound are extremely useful for automating a variety of document based processes but these features are usually only found in extremely expensive...
The application interface is not user-friendly at all. A learning period must pass before you can use the app. However, it can be challenging to make sense of errors. We are unable to access the data on the created external user requests.
If not used correctly, FileBound can be difficult to use and navigate