- Home
- ...
- Digital Accessibility Platforms
- Level Access Accessibility Platform
- UsableNet AQA
- Level Access Accessibility Platform-vs-UsableNet AQA
Compare Level Access Accessibility Platform and UsableNet AQA 
- Users report that UsableNet AQA excels in "Automated Testing" with a score of 9.2, highlighting its efficiency in identifying accessibility issues quickly, while Level Access Accessibility Platform scores lower at 8.2, indicating it may not be as robust in this area.
- Reviewers mention that UsableNet AQA's "Web Accessibility" feature stands out with a score of 9.5, showcasing its strong compliance with accessibility standards, whereas Level Access Accessibility Platform, while still effective, scores slightly lower at 8.5.
- G2 users note that UsableNet AQA offers superior "Digital Media Monitoring" with a score of 8.3, which is crucial for businesses focusing on multimedia content, while Level Access lacks this specific monitoring capability.
- Users on G2 highlight that Level Access Accessibility Platform provides better "Quality of Support" with a score of 9.2 compared to UsableNet AQA's 9.0, suggesting that users may find more responsive assistance with Level Access.
- Reviewers say that UsableNet AQA's "Automated Regression Testing" feature is rated at 8.9, which is beneficial for ongoing compliance checks, while Level Access falls behind with a score of 8.1, indicating potential gaps in this functionality.
- Users report that Level Access Accessibility Platform shines in "User, Role, and Access Management" with a score of 8.4, making it a better choice for organizations needing detailed user control, while UsableNet AQA's score in this area is not as strong.
The AMP platform is relatively easy to navigate and you can set up custom organizations and assets to allow your individual teams to run accessibility audits. The Level Access training sessions are excellent and the platform allows you to easily run tests...
Due to the robust feature set of the tool, it can be cumbersome to use, with slow load time between views. While a skilled accessibility analyst could use AMP to create detailed reports that would allow stakeholders to know with confidence that their...
Easy-to-use tool with lots of features. Quarterly release of new features and functionality based on the feedback from customers. The segregation of each issue and the detailed reports really helps our developers to identify and fix the issues. This also...
UsableNet is not very visual. Even when people leave tasks, it is still difficult to determine exactly what they are talking about or what needs to be done, and the interface could be more user-friendly.
The AMP platform is relatively easy to navigate and you can set up custom organizations and assets to allow your individual teams to run accessibility audits. The Level Access training sessions are excellent and the platform allows you to easily run tests...
Easy-to-use tool with lots of features. Quarterly release of new features and functionality based on the feedback from customers. The segregation of each issue and the detailed reports really helps our developers to identify and fix the issues. This also...
Due to the robust feature set of the tool, it can be cumbersome to use, with slow load time between views. While a skilled accessibility analyst could use AMP to create detailed reports that would allow stakeholders to know with confidence that their...
UsableNet is not very visual. Even when people leave tasks, it is still difficult to determine exactly what they are talking about or what needs to be done, and the interface could be more user-friendly.
