BrowserStack Reviews & Product Details

Browser stack eliminates the need for maintaining a device lab and integrates seamlessly with modern automation frameworks and CI/CD pipelines. Also maintaining and executing the test cases by browser stack is very easy and comfortable Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are 2-3 points i would like to add here.

1. For AI generating test cases there are lots of test cases are created which are not even relevant to the story. so review time increase here which is again a time consuming job.

2. LCA is not available for mobile automation Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about BrowserStack is how easily it enables real-device and cross-browser testing without needing to maintain any physical infrastructure. It saves a lot of setup time and allows quick validation across multiple environments, which is critical for catching compatibility issues early. The platform is reliable, easy to use, and integrates well with automation tools, making both manual and automated testing much more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One downside of BrowserStack is that sessions can sometimes feel slow or laggy, especially on real devices or under heavy load. It can also be a bit expensive for smaller teams, and parallel testing limits can become a bottleneck. Occasionally, debugging issues on remote devices is harder compared to local testing, and there can be minor inconsistencies or flakiness in automated runs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

BrowserStack is a solid automation platform that supports multiple automation tools. I initially worked with Selenium and later moved to Playwright, and the transition was completely seamless because BrowserStack provides excellent compatibility with both. It also allows parallel execution of test cases, which significantly reduces the overall run time.

Another standout feature is the video recording generated after each UI test execution. When a test fails, these recordings make it much easier to identify and debug issues quickly. Along with that, BrowserStack supports a wide range of desktop browsers as well as real mobile devices, which is a major advantage for comprehensive cross‑platform testing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Occasionally, BrowserStack sessions can be a bit flaky. At times, a remote session may disconnect or behave unpredictably, which can lead to false test failures and require reruns. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate BrowserStack's speed and performance, especially since there are no lags or degraded performance noticed on this platform, unlike some other platforms like LambdaTest. The ability to test the same app over multiple devices, whether iOS or Android, and have parallel sessions to see real-time results is very useful. I also find the new features like Image Injection helpful for testing camera scenarios. The provision for testing local apps by setting up a tunnel and storing APKs on Google Drive for easy access is a nice feature. Additionally, integrating BrowserStack with Jira has been seamless, with execution results and evidence getting updated directly in Jira. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Well, there were some limitations with regards to video recording quality. Since these videos were getting attached in JIRA tickets, we saw the quality was not optimum. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The tool is easy to use and there is a lot of mobile devices to select from and some of them are provided early, and that you have access to a lot of extra tools like screen recording with the base plans. We also like the fact that we can install apps from different sources. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Billing is very frustrating with BrowserStack. We have lost access almost yearly and needed to get in touch with an account manager because of the issues in creating a PO for us to expense. Added to that you can only change your user count annually if your on an annual plan and our count fluctuates, it would be nice if BrowserStack offered a more flexible plan.

On the technical side the Android logs are robust, but the iOS logs can be flaky and either take a while to launch after the app is running or don't launch at all. Tablets are only on a few manufacturers it would be nice to have more tablets. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

real-device cloud, seamless integrations, and reliability at scale, which significantly reduce the effort required to ensure cross-browser and cross-device coverage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

BrowserStack offers strong value thanks to its intuitive UI, reliable real‑device performance, and deep integrations with tools like Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, and CI/CD pipelines. Together, these make cross‑browser and mobile testing faster and more dependable. It also streamlines day‑to‑day workflows by removing the need for device management, accelerating debugging with logs, screenshots, and videos, and adding intelligent insights that help pinpoint test failures. Although the pricing is premium, the ROI feels clear through time savings, scalability, and greater confidence in releases. Solid documentation and responsive support further smooth out onboarding and make ongoing use straightforward. It also uses AI to analyse the builds and failures to give the users insights Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like how BrowserStack allows me to have two devices in one window, which means I don't have to shut down one device to boot another. This is especially helpful for testing applications using both Android and iOS environments together. The ability to re-route traffic from virtualized instances to my local network is great because the traffic generated through apps can be routed to a proxy. This helps in intercepting traffic and understanding what goes through the network. I also appreciate the API access. Additionally, the initial setup was very easy, just 3-clicks away. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Having rooted devices in the environment would definitely help me stick around with BrowserStack. Having access to devices for dynamic instrumentation and reading data within memory. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like the cloud devices on BrowserStack; they perform as expected with little difference from real devices. It feels like having a phone that's not in your pocket. The ability to track test execution in real-time with app automate is a huge plus. It takes away the stress from physical devices when running tests, allowing us to monitor executions anytime. Integrating with CI/CD pipelines and GitHub actions makes it seamless for app automation, boosting our efficiency in automation case execution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In recent times, we've had to automate some social media app features that require uploading images from a gallery. The cloud devices don't have a gallery feature, and if there were a way to add images to the gallery, our utilization of BrowserStack would be 100%. Also, the initial integration was a bit hard, and we had multiple discussions with the team to get it done. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For me, as a developer, the main benefit is being able to perform cross-browser and cross-device testing. Our systems depend heavily on the customer experience, so getting valuable insights into what could break before we ship to production is essential. Rather than manually sourcing all of these devices ourselves, we can simply jump into the platform and easily access them when we need to test. It's really easy to integrate browserstack into our current toolset, it's performant enough, the system is easy to understand and the pricing doesn't bite. All in all - nice tool Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There’s still some loss of flexibility compared to owning the devices yourself. Also, the limit on parallel sessions may hit a ceiling at some point if we don’t opt for a more expensive plan. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use BrowserStack for mobile manual and automation testing, web automation, and manual tests as well as a test management tool. I like the various availability of different devices, which is really helpful for my testing needs. The App Live and Web Live features provide various mobiles and operating systems, which are great for my testing requirements. It also helps me keep the automation reports and tasks in pace. Shifting to BrowserStack has helped us be more organized and test case driven, and we're able to display testing coverage to clients more effectively. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The testcase creation and test run management can be improved. The creation of reports needs to be improved. Also, the test cases should be updated when an automation test run is also updated. A field for adding the test data could be helpful along with steps and results. There is some minor issue during testcase creation from Jira, where the selecting of folder is not persisting. The reports generated sometimes do not cover the automation index. Also, the dark theme needs to be introduced. In addition, multiple TC ID tagging has to be provided. The JIRA integration has some issues while logging defects from the automation report. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.