Compare Gitter and Rocket.Chat 
Gitter vs Rocket.Chat
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found them equally easy to use. However, Gitter is easier to set up , while reviewers preferred administration and ease of doing business with Rocket.Chat overall.
- Reviewers felt that Rocket.Chat meets the needs of their business better than Gitter.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Gitter is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Rocket.Chat over Gitter.
- Up to 25 users
- Up to 100 monthly active contacts (Omnichannel)
- ALL PREMIUM CAPABILITIES, INCLUDING:
I like best about Gitter is that we can easily connect with developers or with our team and discuss about the work very easily. The platform provides a range of options for discussion, and its user interface is notably sleek and user-friendly.
Time difference, all people around the world work at different time zones, and that's a hard problem, when you are in rush and want to ask a small question and want answer, chat is AFK, nobody active, although there is a lot of users, it's like IRC chat,...
Unlike Slack, Rocket.Chat allows us to use our own servers. This is great to prevent data breaches and data being stored in the cloud somewhere.
Limitation of file types that can be sent
I like best about Gitter is that we can easily connect with developers or with our team and discuss about the work very easily. The platform provides a range of options for discussion, and its user interface is notably sleek and user-friendly.
Unlike Slack, Rocket.Chat allows us to use our own servers. This is great to prevent data breaches and data being stored in the cloud somewhere.
Time difference, all people around the world work at different time zones, and that's a hard problem, when you are in rush and want to ask a small question and want answer, chat is AFK, nobody active, although there is a lot of users, it's like IRC chat,...
Limitation of file types that can be sent
