Compare Fluent by Apryse and Nitro Pro 
- Users report that Nitro Pro excels in its document signing capabilities, with a score of 9.0, while Fluent by Apryse also performs well but slightly lower at 8.6. Reviewers mention that Nitro Pro's signature workflow is particularly intuitive, making it easier for teams to manage document approvals.
- Reviewers mention that Fluent by Apryse shines in quality of support, scoring 9.0 compared to Nitro Pro's 8.0. Users on G2 appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of Fluent's support team, which can be crucial for businesses needing quick resolutions.
- Users say that Nitro Pro has a more user-friendly setup process, scoring 9.1, while Fluent by Apryse scores 8.3. Reviewers highlight that Nitro Pro's ease of setup allows for a smoother onboarding experience, which is beneficial for small businesses.
- G2 users report that Fluent by Apryse offers better document management features, scoring 8.7 compared to Nitro Pro's 8.7. However, users mention that Fluent's document scanning capabilities are particularly robust, making it easier to digitize physical documents.
- Reviewers mention that Nitro Pro's editing features, particularly the document editor, score 9.1, which is higher than Fluent by Apryse's 8.6. Users appreciate Nitro Pro's comprehensive editing tools that allow for detailed modifications without needing additional software.
- Users on G2 report that Fluent by Apryse has a slight edge in generative AI features, with scores of 7.5 for AI text generation compared to Nitro Pro's 6.9. Reviewers highlight that Fluent's AI capabilities enhance productivity by automating repetitive tasks, which is a significant advantage for mid-market users.
- Powerful PDF Editors (Win, macOS & iOS) and unlimited eSignature Requests
- Create, edit, convert and combine PDFs
- Export PDFs to Word, PPT, Excel, and other image formats
The fact that design is in word, excel and powerpoint allows me to use any of my resources to design the document template directly from the users documents. Adding tags to pull data from any data source is also very easy to learn.
Currently using old version dictated by client version on report server, and the old versions of Autotag's data connector did not play nice with where Windows installs Office by default, even worse now with the recent company stipulation to upgrade to...
This is a really easy package to use - there are tutorials but I've never needed them; just dived in and done what I wanted - such as producing PDFs from multiple pictures or documents, editing PDFs and using the 'quicksign' feature to automatically put a...
Everything else. The GUI is very disorganized and all over the place. The actual editing of PDF's tends to be a clunky affair which only works some of the time. Especially with formatting. I have spent more time helping users format within Nitro that I...
The fact that design is in word, excel and powerpoint allows me to use any of my resources to design the document template directly from the users documents. Adding tags to pull data from any data source is also very easy to learn.
This is a really easy package to use - there are tutorials but I've never needed them; just dived in and done what I wanted - such as producing PDFs from multiple pictures or documents, editing PDFs and using the 'quicksign' feature to automatically put a...
Currently using old version dictated by client version on report server, and the old versions of Autotag's data connector did not play nice with where Windows installs Office by default, even worse now with the recent company stipulation to upgrade to...
Everything else. The GUI is very disorganized and all over the place. The actual editing of PDF's tends to be a clunky affair which only works some of the time. Especially with formatting. I have spent more time helping users format within Nitro that I...
