Compare Contify and Crayon Software 
- Users report that Contify's "Lead Enrichment" feature scores lower at 7.2 compared to Crayon's 8.3, indicating that Crayon provides more effective tools for enhancing lead data.
- Reviewers mention that Crayon excels in "Ease of Setup" with a score of 9.1, while Contify lags behind at 8.5, suggesting that users find Crayon easier to implement and start using.
- G2 users highlight Crayon's superior "Quality of Support" with a rating of 9.6, compared to Contify's 9.4, indicating that Crayon may offer more responsive and helpful customer service.
- Users on G2 note that Crayon's "Custom Dashboards" feature is rated at 8.4, outperforming Contify's 7.5, which suggests that Crayon provides more flexibility and customization options for data visualization.
- Reviewers say that Contify's "Data Sources" score of 8.7 is slightly lower than Crayon's 8.8, indicating that Crayon may offer a broader or more reliable range of data sources for users.
- Users report that Crayon's "Mobile User Support" is rated at 8.3, while Contify's is lower at 7.0, suggesting that Crayon provides a better experience for users who need to access the platform on mobile devices.
1) User-friendly product: Everything from taxonomy to visualization can be customized and defined by users. The content is very clean and of high quality; there is rarely any junk that I've seen during my 2-year experience. Platform features are well...
It is not easy to analysis the data that is in there. There is also a lot of noice that happens. I don't have full control over what is being tracked or even how to see what is being tracked.
Ability to track the digital footprints of multiple competitors. Automated news feed that is easy to access and share. Adding offline or field intelligence. Integration with CRM. Solid reporting. Ability to crowdsource CI for all parts of the...
New CSM is barely there and has not been helpful, no suggestions for streamlining processes or driving adoption. AI features are not helpful, and too little too late compared to competitors. Very manual process of battlecard and intelligence maintenance, no...
1) User-friendly product: Everything from taxonomy to visualization can be customized and defined by users. The content is very clean and of high quality; there is rarely any junk that I've seen during my 2-year experience. Platform features are well...
Ability to track the digital footprints of multiple competitors. Automated news feed that is easy to access and share. Adding offline or field intelligence. Integration with CRM. Solid reporting. Ability to crowdsource CI for all parts of the...
It is not easy to analysis the data that is in there. There is also a lot of noice that happens. I don't have full control over what is being tracked or even how to see what is being tracked.
New CSM is barely there and has not been helpful, no suggestions for streamlining processes or driving adoption. AI features are not helpful, and too little too late compared to competitors. Very manual process of battlecard and intelligence maintenance, no...
