Compare Classy and Qgiv 
- Users report that Classy excels in its Recurring Donations feature, scoring 9.0, which allows for seamless management of ongoing contributions, while Qgiv shines slightly brighter with a score of 9.4, indicating a more robust system for handling recurring donations.
- Reviewers mention that Qgiv's Quality of Support is exceptional, with a score of 9.7, highlighting their responsive customer service, whereas Classy, with a score of 8.9, is noted for being helpful but not as consistently praised for support.
- G2 users indicate that Classy's Campaign Management feature is user-friendly, scoring 9.2, but Qgiv's score of 9.0 suggests it also provides solid campaign tools, albeit with slightly less user satisfaction in this area.
- Users on G2 report that Classy's Donor Profiles feature, scoring 8.5, is effective for tracking donor information, but Qgiv's higher score of 9.6 suggests a more comprehensive and user-friendly approach to managing donor data.
- Reviewers mention that Qgiv's Customization capabilities are highly rated at 9.7, allowing users to tailor their experience extensively, while Classy, with a score of 8.0, offers less flexibility in this regard.
- Users say that both platforms perform well in Reporting, but Qgiv edges out with a score of 9.7 compared to Classy's 9.1, indicating that Qgiv provides more detailed and insightful reporting tools that users find beneficial for their fundraising efforts.
- Unlimited Donation Forms
- Unlimited Event Registrations
- Unlimited Training + Support
The classy staff is extremely accessible. I've never waited more than a day for a response to a customer support question and they've always been super responsive to needs. It's also just the best platform functionally that I've ever worked with.
The UX is actually clunky and confusing. The donor management system is pretty simplistic, and doesn't show a 360 view of the user. Most importantly, the platform is never working at its fullest capacity. Donors weren't syncing to Mailchimp, then the...
Responsiveness to questions I have on designing the portal. Always a professional on the other end of the phone that is committed to helping me.
It is not user friendly for creating new event tickets, the only way to create a new ticket is by cloning other tickets, which is not intuitive on the site. I have to create and recreate tickets for the same purpose almost every time I use the software.
The classy staff is extremely accessible. I've never waited more than a day for a response to a customer support question and they've always been super responsive to needs. It's also just the best platform functionally that I've ever worked with.
Responsiveness to questions I have on designing the portal. Always a professional on the other end of the phone that is committed to helping me.
The UX is actually clunky and confusing. The donor management system is pretty simplistic, and doesn't show a 360 view of the user. Most importantly, the platform is never working at its fullest capacity. Donors weren't syncing to Mailchimp, then the...
It is not user friendly for creating new event tickets, the only way to create a new ticket is by cloning other tickets, which is not intuitive on the site. I have to create and recreate tickets for the same purpose almost every time I use the software.
