Compare Axway Managed File Transfer and webMethods B2B 
- Users report that webMethods B2B excels in Application Integration with a score of 8.7, indicating a seamless connection with various applications, while Axway Managed File Transfer follows closely with a score of 8.5, suggesting it also offers solid integration capabilities but may not be as robust.
- Reviewers mention that Axway Managed File Transfer shines in Encryption, achieving a score of 9.2, which is higher than webMethods B2B's score of 8.7, highlighting a stronger emphasis on data security in file transfers.
- G2 users indicate that webMethods B2B has a slight edge in Disaster Recovery with a score of 8.5, while Axway Managed File Transfer does not have a specific score listed, suggesting that users may find webMethods B2B more reliable in recovery scenarios.
- Users on G2 report that both products perform well in File Transfer Acceleration, with both achieving a score of 8.8, indicating that users can expect efficient file transfers from either solution.
- Reviewers mention that webMethods B2B has a higher score in Ease of Setup at 7.9 compared to Axway Managed File Transfer's 8.3, suggesting that while both are relatively easy to set up, Axway may have a slight advantage in this area.
- Users say that Axway Managed File Transfer is perceived as a better partner in business with a score of 9.1, compared to webMethods B2B's score of 8.5, indicating that users feel more supported and valued by Axway in their business interactions.
- https://www.softwareag.com/en_corporate/contact.html
It is lightweight and easy to configure and most eficient secure channe which we can offer to our clients.
How difficult to implement a PESIT-E and PESIT-E SSL transfer, how the logs on this protocol is not as explicit as the XFB Gateway, lots of PESIT-E capabilites are missing (sending PESIT-E messages, and PESIT-E message types) How difficult to migrate from...
We used webMethods eStandards as the basis of our implementation of the EDIFACT 96A standard to integrate with our supply chain partners for purchase orders and invoices. It made it quick and painless to build this solution, and it has been working in our...
Need to add more bulk processing and custom development methods.
It is lightweight and easy to configure and most eficient secure channe which we can offer to our clients.
We used webMethods eStandards as the basis of our implementation of the EDIFACT 96A standard to integrate with our supply chain partners for purchase orders and invoices. It made it quick and painless to build this solution, and it has been working in our...
How difficult to implement a PESIT-E and PESIT-E SSL transfer, how the logs on this protocol is not as explicit as the XFB Gateway, lots of PESIT-E capabilites are missing (sending PESIT-E messages, and PESIT-E message types) How difficult to migrate from...
Need to add more bulk processing and custom development methods.
