Best Software for 2025 is now live!
|| products.size

Best Graph Database Solutions

Shalaka Joshi
SJ
Researched and written by Shalaka Joshi

Graph databases use topographical data models to store data. These databases connect specific data points (nodes) and create relationships (edges) in the form of graphs that can then be pulled by the user with queries. Nodes can represent customers, companies, or any data a company chooses to record. Edges are formed by the database so that relationships between nodes are easily understood by the user. Businesses can utilize graph databases when they are pulling data and do not want to spend time organizing it into distinct relationships. Large enterprises may use complex queries to pull precise and in-depth information regarding their customer and user information or product tracking data, among other uses. Database administrators can scale high data values and still create usable models. Some businesses may choose to run an RDF database, a type of graph database that focuses on retrieving triples, or information organized in a subject-predicate-object relationship. Similar types of databases include document database tools, key-value store tools, object-orientated database tools and more. Developers who are looking for an affordable solution can look to free database software.

To qualify for inclusion in the Graph Database category, a product must:

Provide data storage
Record and represent data in a topographical schema
Allow users to retrieve the data using query language

Best Graph Databases At A Glance

Best for Small Businesses:
Best for Mid-Market:
Highest User Satisfaction:
Best Free Software:
Show LessShow More
Highest User Satisfaction:
Best Free Software:

G2 takes pride in showing unbiased reviews on user satisfaction in our ratings and reports. We do not allow paid placements in any of our ratings, rankings, or reports. Learn about our scoring methodologies.

No filters applied
66 Listings in Graph Databases Available
(45)4.5 out of 5
1st Easiest To Use in Graph Databases software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Amazon Neptune is a fast, reliable, fully-managed graph database service that makes it easy to build and run applications that work with highly connected datasets. The core of Amazon Neptune is a purp

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 36% Small-Business
    • 16% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Amazon Neptune Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Integrations
    2
    Compatibility
    1
    Monitoring
    1
    Performance Speed
    1
    Scalability
    1
    Cons
    Learning Curve
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Amazon Neptune features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    9.4
    Data Model
    Average: 8.8
    9.3
    Data Types
    Average: 8.8
    9.7
    Built - In Search
    Average: 8.5
  • What G2 Users Think
    Expand/Collapse What G2 Users Think
  • User Sentiment
    How are these determined?Information
    These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for Amazon Neptune, left between May 2018 and June 2022.
    • Reviewers appreciate Amazon Neptune’s graph database engine, which is optimized for storing large datasets of relationships and querying with low latency.
    • Reviewers appreciate the level of security and data privacy that Amazon Neptune offers.
    • Reviewers enjoy the easy backups provided by the platform.
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2006
    HQ Location
    Seattle, WA
    Twitter
    @awscloud
    2,230,610 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    136,383 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ: AMZN
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Amazon Neptune is a fast, reliable, fully-managed graph database service that makes it easy to build and run applications that work with highly connected datasets. The core of Amazon Neptune is a purp

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 36% Small-Business
  • 16% Mid-Market
Amazon Neptune Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Integrations
2
Compatibility
1
Monitoring
1
Performance Speed
1
Scalability
1
Cons
Learning Curve
1
Amazon Neptune features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
9.4
Data Model
Average: 8.8
9.3
Data Types
Average: 8.8
9.7
Built - In Search
Average: 8.5
User Sentiment
How are these determined?Information
These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for Amazon Neptune, left between May 2018 and June 2022.
  • Reviewers appreciate Amazon Neptune’s graph database engine, which is optimized for storing large datasets of relationships and querying with low latency.
  • Reviewers appreciate the level of security and data privacy that Amazon Neptune offers.
  • Reviewers enjoy the easy backups provided by the platform.
Seller Details
Year Founded
2006
HQ Location
Seattle, WA
Twitter
@awscloud
2,230,610 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
136,383 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ: AMZN
(110)4.6 out of 5
Optimized for quick response
3rd Easiest To Use in Graph Databases software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Free
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    ArangoDB is the company behind the leading, multi-model graph data and analytics platform that uncovers insights that are difficult or impossible with traditional SQL, Document, or even legacy graph d

    Users
    • Senior Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 58% Small-Business
    • 22% Enterprise
    User Sentiment
    How are these determined?Information
    These insights, currently in beta, are compiled from user reviews and grouped to display a high-level overview of the software.
    • ArangoDB is an open-source database that supports graph, document, and key-value data models and provides a unified query language for handling both graph and relational-style queries.
    • Reviewers appreciate ArangoDB's user-friendly interface, its compatibility with schema-less design, the flexibility as a graph database, and the ability to write JSON-first queries using AQL.
    • Users mentioned that the management and operations on collections and databases using AQL are weak, the documentation could be improved, and there is a degree of lock-in due to the unified query language.
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • ArangoDB Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    22
    Features
    14
    Flexibility
    12
    Querying
    12
    Customer Support
    11
    Cons
    Improvement Needed
    8
    Lack of Information
    8
    Query Complexity
    7
    Difficult Learning
    6
    Limitations
    6
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • ArangoDB features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    9.1
    Data Model
    Average: 8.8
    8.8
    Data Types
    Average: 8.8
    8.4
    Built - In Search
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    ArangoDB
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    2015
    HQ Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Twitter
    @arangodb
    11,802 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    71 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

ArangoDB is the company behind the leading, multi-model graph data and analytics platform that uncovers insights that are difficult or impossible with traditional SQL, Document, or even legacy graph d

Users
  • Senior Software Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 58% Small-Business
  • 22% Enterprise
User Sentiment
How are these determined?Information
These insights, currently in beta, are compiled from user reviews and grouped to display a high-level overview of the software.
  • ArangoDB is an open-source database that supports graph, document, and key-value data models and provides a unified query language for handling both graph and relational-style queries.
  • Reviewers appreciate ArangoDB's user-friendly interface, its compatibility with schema-less design, the flexibility as a graph database, and the ability to write JSON-first queries using AQL.
  • Users mentioned that the management and operations on collections and databases using AQL are weak, the documentation could be improved, and there is a degree of lock-in due to the unified query language.
ArangoDB Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
22
Features
14
Flexibility
12
Querying
12
Customer Support
11
Cons
Improvement Needed
8
Lack of Information
8
Query Complexity
7
Difficult Learning
6
Limitations
6
ArangoDB features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
9.1
Data Model
Average: 8.8
8.8
Data Types
Average: 8.8
8.4
Built - In Search
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
ArangoDB
Company Website
Year Founded
2015
HQ Location
San Francisco, CA
Twitter
@arangodb
11,802 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
71 employees on LinkedIn®

This is how G2 Deals can help you:

  • Easily shop for curated – and trusted – software
  • Own your own software buying journey
  • Discover exclusive deals on software
(132)4.5 out of 5
5th Easiest To Use in Graph Databases software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Free
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    The fastest path to graph. Centered around the leading native graph database, today's Neo4j Graph Data Platform is a suite of applications and tools helping the world make sense of data. The Platfor

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 43% Small-Business
    • 30% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Neo4j Graph Database Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    6
    Database Management
    3
    Features
    2
    Scalability
    2
    Speed
    2
    Cons
    Limited Storage
    2
    Data Security
    1
    Frequent Updates
    1
    Learning Curve
    1
    Limitations
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Neo4j Graph Database features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    7.7
    Data Model
    Average: 8.8
    8.2
    Data Types
    Average: 8.8
    8.0
    Built - In Search
    Average: 8.5
  • What G2 Users Think
    Expand/Collapse What G2 Users Think
  • User Sentiment
    How are these determined?Information
    These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for Neo4j Graph Database, left between December 2021 and June 2022.
    • Reviewers appreciate Neo4j’s native graph database and library, which is flexible and easy to scale even for beginners.
    • Reviewers enjoy the platform to build complex knowledge graphs.
    • Reviewers appreciate Neo4j’s open-source community edition that provides tutorials and community support.
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2007
    HQ Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Twitter
    @neo4j
    45,834 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    920 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

The fastest path to graph. Centered around the leading native graph database, today's Neo4j Graph Data Platform is a suite of applications and tools helping the world make sense of data. The Platfor

Users
  • Software Engineer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 43% Small-Business
  • 30% Mid-Market
Neo4j Graph Database Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
6
Database Management
3
Features
2
Scalability
2
Speed
2
Cons
Limited Storage
2
Data Security
1
Frequent Updates
1
Learning Curve
1
Limitations
1
Neo4j Graph Database features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
7.7
Data Model
Average: 8.8
8.2
Data Types
Average: 8.8
8.0
Built - In Search
Average: 8.5
User Sentiment
How are these determined?Information
These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for Neo4j Graph Database, left between December 2021 and June 2022.
  • Reviewers appreciate Neo4j’s native graph database and library, which is flexible and easy to scale even for beginners.
  • Reviewers enjoy the platform to build complex knowledge graphs.
  • Reviewers appreciate Neo4j’s open-source community edition that provides tutorials and community support.
Seller Details
Year Founded
2007
HQ Location
San Mateo, CA
Twitter
@neo4j
45,834 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
920 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    The Apollo Graph Platform unifies GraphQL across apps and services, unlocking faster delivery for engineering teams

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 50% Mid-Market
    • 40% Small-Business
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • apollographql.com features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.3
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    9.8
    Data Model
    Average: 8.8
    10.0
    Data Types
    Average: 8.8
    9.2
    Built - In Search
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2016
    HQ Location
    San Francisco, US
    Twitter
    @apollographql
    47,470 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    243 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

The Apollo Graph Platform unifies GraphQL across apps and services, unlocking faster delivery for engineering teams

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 50% Mid-Market
  • 40% Small-Business
apollographql.com features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
9.8
Data Model
Average: 8.8
10.0
Data Types
Average: 8.8
9.2
Built - In Search
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Year Founded
2016
HQ Location
San Francisco, US
Twitter
@apollographql
47,470 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
243 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Serverless, self-serve and affordable analytics designed to help you get the most out of your data.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 51% Small-Business
    • 37% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • GraphJSON features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.7
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    8.7
    Data Model
    Average: 8.8
    7.9
    Data Types
    Average: 8.8
    8.2
    Built - In Search
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    GraphJSON
    HQ Location
    N/A
    Twitter
    @GraphJSON
    531 Twitter followers
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Serverless, self-serve and affordable analytics designed to help you get the most out of your data.

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 51% Small-Business
  • 37% Mid-Market
GraphJSON features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
8.7
Data Model
Average: 8.8
7.9
Data Types
Average: 8.8
8.2
Built - In Search
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
GraphJSON
HQ Location
N/A
Twitter
@GraphJSON
531 Twitter followers
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    See the Value in Your Data. Flexible analytics and visualization platform. Real-time summary and charting of streaming data. Intuitive interface for a variety of users. Instant sharing and embedding o

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Senior Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 44% Mid-Market
    • 36% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Elastic Stack Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    6
    Easy Integrations
    5
    Data Visualization
    4
    Integrations
    4
    Analytics
    3
    Cons
    Missing Features
    4
    Complex Configuration
    2
    Feature Limitations
    2
    Lagging Issues
    2
    Poor UI
    2
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Elastic Stack features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.4
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    10.0
    Data Model
    Average: 8.8
    9.4
    Data Types
    Average: 8.8
    8.9
    Built - In Search
    Average: 8.5
  • What G2 Users Think
    Expand/Collapse What G2 Users Think
  • User Sentiment
    How are these determined?Information
    These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for Elastic Stack, left between June 2016 and July 2022.
    • Reviewers appreciate Elastic Stack’s easy-to-use interface and integration with Elasticsearch.
    • Reviewers appreciate the data visualization and dashboard features of the tool.
    • Reviewers enjoy the full-text search feature for its customizability and flexibility.
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Elastic
    Year Founded
    2012
    HQ Location
    Mountain View, CA
    Twitter
    @elastic
    64,223 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    4,199 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NYSE: ESTC
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

See the Value in Your Data. Flexible analytics and visualization platform. Real-time summary and charting of streaming data. Intuitive interface for a variety of users. Instant sharing and embedding o

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Senior Software Engineer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 44% Mid-Market
  • 36% Enterprise
Elastic Stack Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
6
Easy Integrations
5
Data Visualization
4
Integrations
4
Analytics
3
Cons
Missing Features
4
Complex Configuration
2
Feature Limitations
2
Lagging Issues
2
Poor UI
2
Elastic Stack features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.4
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
10.0
Data Model
Average: 8.8
9.4
Data Types
Average: 8.8
8.9
Built - In Search
Average: 8.5
User Sentiment
How are these determined?Information
These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for Elastic Stack, left between June 2016 and July 2022.
  • Reviewers appreciate Elastic Stack’s easy-to-use interface and integration with Elasticsearch.
  • Reviewers appreciate the data visualization and dashboard features of the tool.
  • Reviewers enjoy the full-text search feature for its customizability and flexibility.
Seller Details
Seller
Elastic
Year Founded
2012
HQ Location
Mountain View, CA
Twitter
@elastic
64,223 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
4,199 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NYSE: ESTC
(38)4.6 out of 5
Optimized for quick response
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    DataStax is the company that powers generative AI applications with real-time, scalable data and production-ready vector data tools that generative AI applications need, and seamless integration with

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 39% Small-Business
    • 37% Enterprise
    User Sentiment
    How are these determined?Information
    These insights, currently in beta, are compiled from user reviews and grouped to display a high-level overview of the software.
    • DataStax Astra DB is a fully managed database service with advanced vector search capabilities and real-time processing, designed to simplify database operations and handle diverse types of queries.
    • Users frequently mention the simplicity of AstraDB, its powerful vector capabilities, the wide range of open-source options, and the supportive and responsive team at DataStax.
    • Reviewers mentioned a steep learning curve due to the long list of Query APIs, high costs, lack of sufficient video tutorials and templates, and the need for significant operational resources to manage distributed Cassandra clusters.
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • DataStax Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Customer Support
    13
    Ease of Use
    12
    Features
    9
    Integrations
    7
    Data Management
    6
    Cons
    Data Management Issues
    5
    Difficult Learning
    4
    Learning Curve
    4
    Learning Difficulty
    4
    Poor Documentation
    3
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • DataStax features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.4
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    9.2
    Data Model
    Average: 8.8
    9.2
    Data Types
    Average: 8.8
    9.2
    Built - In Search
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    DataStax
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    2010
    HQ Location
    Santa Clara, CA
    Twitter
    @DataStax
    98,967 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    694 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

DataStax is the company that powers generative AI applications with real-time, scalable data and production-ready vector data tools that generative AI applications need, and seamless integration with

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 39% Small-Business
  • 37% Enterprise
User Sentiment
How are these determined?Information
These insights, currently in beta, are compiled from user reviews and grouped to display a high-level overview of the software.
  • DataStax Astra DB is a fully managed database service with advanced vector search capabilities and real-time processing, designed to simplify database operations and handle diverse types of queries.
  • Users frequently mention the simplicity of AstraDB, its powerful vector capabilities, the wide range of open-source options, and the supportive and responsive team at DataStax.
  • Reviewers mentioned a steep learning curve due to the long list of Query APIs, high costs, lack of sufficient video tutorials and templates, and the need for significant operational resources to manage distributed Cassandra clusters.
DataStax Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Customer Support
13
Ease of Use
12
Features
9
Integrations
7
Data Management
6
Cons
Data Management Issues
5
Difficult Learning
4
Learning Curve
4
Learning Difficulty
4
Poor Documentation
3
DataStax features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.4
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
9.2
Data Model
Average: 8.8
9.2
Data Types
Average: 8.8
9.2
Built - In Search
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
DataStax
Company Website
Year Founded
2010
HQ Location
Santa Clara, CA
Twitter
@DataStax
98,967 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
694 employees on LinkedIn®
By SAP
(60)3.9 out of 5
4th Easiest To Use in Graph Databases software
View top Consulting Services for OrientDB
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:FREE
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    OrientDB is the first Multi-Model Distributed DBMS with a True Graph Engine. Multi-Model means 2nd generation NoSQL able to manage complex domain with incredible performance. OrientDB manages relation

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 47% Small-Business
    • 42% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • OrientDB Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Data Storage
    1
    Cons
    This product has not yet received any negative sentiments.
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • OrientDB features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    8.6
    Data Model
    Average: 8.8
    7.8
    Data Types
    Average: 8.8
    8.2
    Built - In Search
    Average: 8.5
  • What G2 Users Think
    Expand/Collapse What G2 Users Think
  • User Sentiment
    How are these determined?Information
    These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for OrientDB, left between October 2020 and March 2021.
    • Reviewers appreciate OreientDB’s performance, but some reviewers have encountered performance issues with the platform.
    • Reviewers use OrientDB for graph and document-based databases.
    • Reviewers appreciate the SQL to graph conversion feature of the platform.
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    SAP
    Year Founded
    1972
    HQ Location
    Walldorf
    Twitter
    @SAP
    301,846 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    125,049 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NYSE:SAP
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

OrientDB is the first Multi-Model Distributed DBMS with a True Graph Engine. Multi-Model means 2nd generation NoSQL able to manage complex domain with incredible performance. OrientDB manages relation

Users
  • Software Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 47% Small-Business
  • 42% Mid-Market
OrientDB Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Data Storage
1
Cons
This product has not yet received any negative sentiments.
OrientDB features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
8.6
Data Model
Average: 8.8
7.8
Data Types
Average: 8.8
8.2
Built - In Search
Average: 8.5
User Sentiment
How are these determined?Information
These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for OrientDB, left between October 2020 and March 2021.
  • Reviewers appreciate OreientDB’s performance, but some reviewers have encountered performance issues with the platform.
  • Reviewers use OrientDB for graph and document-based databases.
  • Reviewers appreciate the SQL to graph conversion feature of the platform.
Seller Details
Seller
SAP
Year Founded
1972
HQ Location
Walldorf
Twitter
@SAP
301,846 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
125,049 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NYSE:SAP
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    TigerGraph is the only scalable graph database for the enterprise. Based on the industry’s first Native and Parallel Graph technology, TigerGraph unleashes the power of interconnected data, offering o

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 55% Enterprise
    • 36% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Tigergraph features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.3
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    9.3
    Data Model
    Average: 8.8
    8.5
    Data Types
    Average: 8.8
    8.3
    Built - In Search
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2012
    HQ Location
    Redwood City, CA
    Twitter
    @TigerGraphDB
    12,983 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    157 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

TigerGraph is the only scalable graph database for the enterprise. Based on the industry’s first Native and Parallel Graph technology, TigerGraph unleashes the power of interconnected data, offering o

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 55% Enterprise
  • 36% Mid-Market
Tigergraph features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
9.3
Data Model
Average: 8.8
8.5
Data Types
Average: 8.8
8.3
Built - In Search
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Year Founded
2012
HQ Location
Redwood City, CA
Twitter
@TigerGraphDB
12,983 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
157 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    GraphBase is a second generation Graph Database Management System (DBMS). Built for 21st Century data problems, GraphBase is a game-changer when it comes to handling large, complex data structures.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 50% Small-Business
    • 38% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • GraphBase features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.9
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    7.8
    Data Model
    Average: 8.8
    8.1
    Data Types
    Average: 8.8
    6.9
    Built - In Search
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    FactNexus
    Year Founded
    2010
    HQ Location
    Sydney
    Twitter
    @AskKayBot
    6 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

GraphBase is a second generation Graph Database Management System (DBMS). Built for 21st Century data problems, GraphBase is a game-changer when it comes to handling large, complex data structures.

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 50% Small-Business
  • 38% Mid-Market
GraphBase features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
7.8
Data Model
Average: 8.8
8.1
Data Types
Average: 8.8
6.9
Built - In Search
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
FactNexus
Year Founded
2010
HQ Location
Sydney
Twitter
@AskKayBot
6 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    FlockDB is simpler than other graph databases because it tries to solve fewer problems. It scales horizontally and is designed for on-line, low-latency, high throughput environments such as web-sites.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 36% Mid-Market
    • 36% Small-Business
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • FlockDB features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.3
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    0.0
    No information available
    0.0
    No information available
    0.0
    No information available
  • What G2 Users Think
    Expand/Collapse What G2 Users Think
  • User Sentiment
    How are these determined?Information
    These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for FlockDB, left between January 2019 and July 2020.
    • Reviewers appreciate the wide variety of network graphs in FlockDB, but some find the depth of information unsatisfactory.
    • Reviewers regularly use FlockDB to understand social media usage and user data.
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Twitter
    Year Founded
    2006
    HQ Location
    San Francisco, CA
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1,317 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NYSE: TWTR
    Total Revenue (USD mm)
    $3,716
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

FlockDB is simpler than other graph databases because it tries to solve fewer problems. It scales horizontally and is designed for on-line, low-latency, high throughput environments such as web-sites.

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 36% Mid-Market
  • 36% Small-Business
FlockDB features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
0.0
No information available
0.0
No information available
0.0
No information available
User Sentiment
How are these determined?Information
These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for FlockDB, left between January 2019 and July 2020.
  • Reviewers appreciate the wide variety of network graphs in FlockDB, but some find the depth of information unsatisfactory.
  • Reviewers regularly use FlockDB to understand social media usage and user data.
Seller Details
Seller
Twitter
Year Founded
2006
HQ Location
San Francisco, CA
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1,317 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NYSE: TWTR
Total Revenue (USD mm)
$3,716
(22)4.7 out of 5
2nd Easiest To Use in Graph Databases software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:$39.99 per backend per...
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Dgraph is the world's most advanced GraphQL database with a graph backend. The number one graph database on GitHub and over 500,000 downloads every month, Dgraph is built for performance and scalabili

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 68% Small-Business
    • 18% Enterprise
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Dgraph features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    9.7
    Data Model
    Average: 8.8
    9.5
    Data Types
    Average: 8.8
    9.4
    Built - In Search
    Average: 8.5
  • What G2 Users Think
    Expand/Collapse What G2 Users Think
  • User Sentiment
    How are these determined?Information
    These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for Dgraph, left between January 2021 and February 2022.
    • Reviewers appreciate Dgraph’s GraphQL features and the web UI, which makes it easy to parse the schema and build queries.
    • Reviewers appreciate the features to build and manage schemas.
    • Reviewers appreciate the rapidly evolving platform and the new features being added.
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2016
    HQ Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Twitter
    @dgraphlabs
    7 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    24 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Dgraph is the world's most advanced GraphQL database with a graph backend. The number one graph database on GitHub and over 500,000 downloads every month, Dgraph is built for performance and scalabili

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 68% Small-Business
  • 18% Enterprise
Dgraph features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
9.7
Data Model
Average: 8.8
9.5
Data Types
Average: 8.8
9.4
Built - In Search
Average: 8.5
User Sentiment
How are these determined?Information
These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for Dgraph, left between January 2021 and February 2022.
  • Reviewers appreciate Dgraph’s GraphQL features and the web UI, which makes it easy to parse the schema and build queries.
  • Reviewers appreciate the features to build and manage schemas.
  • Reviewers appreciate the rapidly evolving platform and the new features being added.
Seller Details
Year Founded
2016
HQ Location
San Francisco, CA
Twitter
@dgraphlabs
7 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
24 employees on LinkedIn®
Entry Level Price:$71 per month
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Redis Cloud is our fully-managed Redis Enterprise service, delivering unmatched speed, simplicity, and scalability. It's perfect for cloud-native applications requiring real-time data processing, with

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 53% Small-Business
    • 38% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Redis Cloud Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    2
    Customer Support
    1
    Data Security
    1
    Easy Integrations
    1
    Monitoring
    1
    Cons
    Lack of Features
    2
    Cloud Limitations
    1
    Complex Data Modeling
    1
    Data Limitations
    1
    High Memory Usage
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Redis Cloud features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.2
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    0.0
    No information available
    0.0
    No information available
    0.0
    No information available
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Redis
    Year Founded
    2011
    HQ Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Twitter
    @Redisinc
    43,736 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1,129 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Redis Cloud is our fully-managed Redis Enterprise service, delivering unmatched speed, simplicity, and scalability. It's perfect for cloud-native applications requiring real-time data processing, with

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 53% Small-Business
  • 38% Mid-Market
Redis Cloud Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
2
Customer Support
1
Data Security
1
Easy Integrations
1
Monitoring
1
Cons
Lack of Features
2
Cloud Limitations
1
Complex Data Modeling
1
Data Limitations
1
High Memory Usage
1
Redis Cloud features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.2
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
0.0
No information available
0.0
No information available
0.0
No information available
Seller Details
Seller
Redis
Year Founded
2011
HQ Location
San Francisco, CA
Twitter
@Redisinc
43,736 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1,129 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Discover powerful SharePoint Solutions for your business needs. From document management to team collaboration, our expert team can customize SharePoint to fit your unique requirements. Contact us t

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 45% Enterprise
    • 27% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Titan features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    10.0
    Data Model
    Average: 8.8
    10.0
    Data Types
    Average: 8.8
    10.0
    Built - In Search
    Average: 8.5
  • What G2 Users Think
    Expand/Collapse What G2 Users Think
  • User Sentiment
    How are these determined?Information
    These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for Titan, left between March 2016 and October 2020.
    • Reviewers appreciate Titan for its easy scalability.
    • Reviewers appreciate the tutorials and documentation of the platform.
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    DataStax
    Year Founded
    2010
    HQ Location
    Santa Clara, CA
    Twitter
    @DataStax
    98,967 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    694 employees on LinkedIn®
    Phone
    650-389-6000
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Discover powerful SharePoint Solutions for your business needs. From document management to team collaboration, our expert team can customize SharePoint to fit your unique requirements. Contact us t

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 45% Enterprise
  • 27% Mid-Market
Titan features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
10.0
Data Model
Average: 8.8
10.0
Data Types
Average: 8.8
10.0
Built - In Search
Average: 8.5
User Sentiment
How are these determined?Information
These insights are written by G2's Market Research team, using actual user reviews for Titan, left between March 2016 and October 2020.
  • Reviewers appreciate Titan for its easy scalability.
  • Reviewers appreciate the tutorials and documentation of the platform.
Seller Details
Seller
DataStax
Year Founded
2010
HQ Location
Santa Clara, CA
Twitter
@DataStax
98,967 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
694 employees on LinkedIn®
Phone
650-389-6000
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Stardog is a reusable, scalable knowledge graph platform that enables enterprises to unify all their data, including data sources and databases of every type, to get the answers needed to drive busine

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 41% Small-Business
    • 29% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Stardog features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.7
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    9.2
    Data Model
    Average: 8.8
    8.1
    Data Types
    Average: 8.8
    8.8
    Built - In Search
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    HQ Location
    Arlington, VA
    Twitter
    @StardogHQ
    4,100 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    81 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Stardog is a reusable, scalable knowledge graph platform that enables enterprises to unify all their data, including data sources and databases of every type, to get the answers needed to drive busine

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 41% Small-Business
  • 29% Mid-Market
Stardog features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
9.2
Data Model
Average: 8.8
8.1
Data Types
Average: 8.8
8.8
Built - In Search
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
HQ Location
Arlington, VA
Twitter
@StardogHQ
4,100 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
81 employees on LinkedIn®

Learn More About Graph Databases

What are Graph Databases?

Graph databases are designed for depicting relationships (edges) between data points (nodes). Less structurally rigid than relational databases, graph databases allow nodes to have a multitude of edges; that is, there’s no limit on the number of relationships a node can have. (An example of this is in the following section.) Additionally, each edge can have multiple characteristics which define it. There is no formal limit—nor standardization—on how many edges each node can have, nor how many characteristics an edge can have. Graph databases can also contain many different pieces of information that would not necessarily be normally related.

Each node is defined by pieces of information called properties. Properties could be names, dates, identification numbers, basic descriptors, or other information—anything that would describe the node itself. Nodes are connected by edges, which can be directed or undirected. Like in mathematical graph theory, an undirected edge is bidirectional; that is, a relationship can be carried from node A to node B, and from node B to node A. A directed edge, however, only carries meaning in one direction, say from node B to node A.

Key Benefits of Graph Databases

  • Organize a variety of data without rigid structures
  • Offer flexible scaling and adjustment inherently
  • Describe numerous data relationship characteristics simultaneously

Why Use Graph Databases?

Graph databases are ideal for storing and retrieving information that is independent but related in multiple ways. For example, say a user wanted to map a group of friends. Each friend would be a node, with edges between each friend with a characteristic “friends." But, say two of those friends are coworkers; then, their edge would also have a characteristic “coworkers." Edges can get further definition by adding common interests, personal experiences, and so on.

Because graph databases are, by design, most conducive to organizing broad sets of data through which there are not uniform relationships or kinds of data, they can be invaluable tools for social mapping, master data management, knowledge graphing/ontology, infrastructure mapping, recommendation engines, and more. A business could set each node to be one of their products, and let edges draw recommendation relationships based on what product a consumer might buy. It could also map relationships between contacts, departments, and more.

Graph databases are flexible and scalable by design, so a business user would not need to know an exact or complete use case for a graph database before creating it. Expanding a graph database is a matter of adding new nodes and any potential edges which might be associated with them.

Who Uses Graph Databases?

Like other databases, graph databases are primarily maintained by a database administrator or team. That said, because of their wide range of coverage, graph databases are often accessed by several organizations within a company. Development, IT, billing, and more would all have valid reasons for needing access to graph databases, pending their assigned uses within the company.

Graph Databases Features

Graph database solutions will typically have the following features.

Database creation and maintenance — Graph databases allow users to easily build and maintain a database(s).

CRUD operations — An acronym for create, read, update, and delete, CRUD operations delineate basic operations of many databases. Graph databases should be able to perform these operations and usually can with similar capability to the most notable CRUD-oriented database type, relational.

Scalability and flexibility — Graph databases can grow and expand with business requirements. Unlike some other database solutions, they can scale more quickly with less worry about strict data organization, relying instead on developing relationships between new and existing nodes.

Simplified querying — Graph databases can skip some larger query complexities, bypassing things like foreign keys, nested queries, and join statements in favor of direct or transitive relationships.

OS compatibility — Graph databases do not require any one specific operating system to run, making them a flexible choice for any operating system.

Potential Issues with Graph Databases

Security and privacy — As alluded to above, graph databases can struggle with security and privacy situations. They require more strict implementations of security and access measures. Since graph databases are more oriented toward mapping relationships, that structure can also be utilized in ways that could raise privacy concerns, such as revealing a more laid-bare view of a client or customer—and every other potential client or customer to which they are related. Businesses implementing graph databases should take extra care to secure both how these databases are accessed, and the databases themselves.

Data integrity implications — Graph databases simplify the ways in which information relates to other information. In doing so, by shortening or condensing the relationship (as compared to, say, traversing numerous tables in a relational database), it’s particularly vital that all data in a graph database is accurate. One improperly aligned relationship can directly lead to incorrect data, unlike in a relational database where improper data might hit a snag during a nested query, throw an error, and out the issue. So, in using graph databases, data integrity is of particularly high importance.