Best Software for 2025 is now live!
|| products.size

Best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Software for Medium-Sized Businesses - Page 2

Lauren Worth
LW
Researched and written by Lauren Worth

Products classified in the overall Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category are similar in many regards and help companies of all sizes solve their business problems. However, medium-sized business features, pricing, setup, and installation differ from businesses of other sizes, which is why we match buyers to the right Medium-Sized Business Data Loss Prevention (DLP) to fit their needs. Compare product ratings based on reviews from enterprise users or connect with one of G2's buying advisors to find the right solutions within the Medium-Sized Business Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category.

In addition to qualifying for inclusion in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Software category, to qualify for inclusion in the Medium-Sized Business Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Software category, a product must have at least 10 reviews left by a reviewer from a medium-sized business.

G2 takes pride in showing unbiased reviews on user satisfaction in our ratings and reports. We do not allow paid placements in any of our ratings, rankings, or reports. Learn about our scoring methodologies.

1 filter applied
Clear All
20 Listings in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Available
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    The Tessian Cloud Email Security Platform intelligently protects against advanced threats and data loss on email, while reducing security teams' workloads, and coaching people about security threats i

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Financial Services
    • Legal Services
    Market Segment
    • 57% Mid-Market
    • 43% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Proofpoint Adaptive Email Security Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Email Security
    7
    Security
    6
    Ease of Use
    5
    AI Technology
    4
    Artificial Intelligence
    4
    Cons
    Ineffective Notifications
    2
    Limited Features
    2
    Poor Customer Support
    2
    Poor Detection
    2
    Alert Issues
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Proofpoint Adaptive Email Security features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.8
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    8.8
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    8.8
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    8.9
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2002
    HQ Location
    Sunnyvale, CA
    Twitter
    @proofpoint
    30,844 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    4,697 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ: PFPT
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

The Tessian Cloud Email Security Platform intelligently protects against advanced threats and data loss on email, while reducing security teams' workloads, and coaching people about security threats i

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Financial Services
  • Legal Services
Market Segment
  • 57% Mid-Market
  • 43% Enterprise
Proofpoint Adaptive Email Security Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Email Security
7
Security
6
Ease of Use
5
AI Technology
4
Artificial Intelligence
4
Cons
Ineffective Notifications
2
Limited Features
2
Poor Customer Support
2
Poor Detection
2
Alert Issues
1
Proofpoint Adaptive Email Security features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.8
Access Control
Average: 8.6
8.8
Compliance
Average: 9.0
8.9
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Year Founded
2002
HQ Location
Sunnyvale, CA
Twitter
@proofpoint
30,844 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
4,697 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ: PFPT
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Financial Services
    Market Segment
    • 59% Mid-Market
    • 27% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Data Protection
    1
    Detection Efficiency
    1
    Email Security
    1
    Monitoring
    1
    Cons
    Limited Features
    1
    Update Issues
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.5
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    8.6
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    9.2
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    9.7
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Microsoft
    Year Founded
    1975
    HQ Location
    Redmond, Washington
    Twitter
    @microsoft
    14,031,499 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    238,990 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    MSFT
Users
No information available
Industries
  • Financial Services
Market Segment
  • 59% Mid-Market
  • 27% Enterprise
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Data Protection
1
Detection Efficiency
1
Email Security
1
Monitoring
1
Cons
Limited Features
1
Update Issues
1
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.5
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.6
Access Control
Average: 8.6
9.2
Compliance
Average: 9.0
9.7
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Seller
Microsoft
Year Founded
1975
HQ Location
Redmond, Washington
Twitter
@microsoft
14,031,499 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
238,990 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
MSFT

This is how G2 Deals can help you:

  • Easily shop for curated – and trusted – software
  • Own your own software buying journey
  • Discover exclusive deals on software
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Trend Micro develops server security, cloud security, and small business content security solutions.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 49% Mid-Market
    • 30% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Trend Micro Smart Protection Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Protection
    2
    Customization Options
    1
    Ease of Use
    1
    Features
    1
    Patching Efficiency
    1
    Cons
    Expensive
    1
    Licensing Issues
    1
    Pricing Issues
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Trend Micro Smart Protection features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.8
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    8.3
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    8.3
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    8.1
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    1988
    HQ Location
    Tokyo
    Twitter
    @trendmicro
    113,698 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    7,572 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    OTCMKTS:TMICY
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Trend Micro develops server security, cloud security, and small business content security solutions.

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 49% Mid-Market
  • 30% Enterprise
Trend Micro Smart Protection Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Protection
2
Customization Options
1
Ease of Use
1
Features
1
Patching Efficiency
1
Cons
Expensive
1
Licensing Issues
1
Pricing Issues
1
Trend Micro Smart Protection features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.3
Access Control
Average: 8.6
8.3
Compliance
Average: 9.0
8.1
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Year Founded
1988
HQ Location
Tokyo
Twitter
@trendmicro
113,698 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
7,572 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
OTCMKTS:TMICY
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Symantec’s Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solution discovers, monitors, and protects sensitive data wherever it goes – across cloud apps, endpoints, networks and data centers. With DLP, businesses are abl

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer & Network Security
    Market Segment
    • 43% Enterprise
    • 43% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Symantec Data Loss Prevention features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.4
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    8.7
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    9.0
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    9.2
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Broadcom
    Year Founded
    1991
    HQ Location
    San Jose, CA
    Twitter
    @broadcom
    59,257 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    61,034 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ: CA
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Symantec’s Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solution discovers, monitors, and protects sensitive data wherever it goes – across cloud apps, endpoints, networks and data centers. With DLP, businesses are abl

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer & Network Security
Market Segment
  • 43% Enterprise
  • 43% Mid-Market
Symantec Data Loss Prevention features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.4
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.7
Access Control
Average: 8.6
9.0
Compliance
Average: 9.0
9.2
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Seller
Broadcom
Year Founded
1991
HQ Location
San Jose, CA
Twitter
@broadcom
59,257 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
61,034 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ: CA
(18)4.6 out of 5
12th Easiest To Use in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Contact Us
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Metomic helps companies protect sensitive data across their SaaS apps. Giving tech companies complete visibility and control over sensitive data in their SaaS suite - including Slack and Google Dr

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Insurance
    • Financial Services
    Market Segment
    • 89% Mid-Market
    • 11% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Metomic Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    2
    User Interface
    2
    Collaboration
    1
    Data Protection
    1
    Easy Navigation
    1
    Cons
    Expensive
    1
    Poor Interface
    1
    Poor Interface Design
    1
    Poor User Interface
    1
    Pricing Issues
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Metomic features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.4
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    9.2
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    8.7
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    9.3
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Metomic
    Year Founded
    2018
    HQ Location
    London, United Kingdom
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    34 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Metomic helps companies protect sensitive data across their SaaS apps. Giving tech companies complete visibility and control over sensitive data in their SaaS suite - including Slack and Google Dr

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Insurance
  • Financial Services
Market Segment
  • 89% Mid-Market
  • 11% Enterprise
Metomic Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
2
User Interface
2
Collaboration
1
Data Protection
1
Easy Navigation
1
Cons
Expensive
1
Poor Interface
1
Poor Interface Design
1
Poor User Interface
1
Pricing Issues
1
Metomic features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.4
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
9.2
Access Control
Average: 8.6
8.7
Compliance
Average: 9.0
9.3
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Seller
Metomic
Year Founded
2018
HQ Location
London, United Kingdom
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
34 employees on LinkedIn®