Top Rated Smartbear Continuous Testing Alternatives
328 Smartbear Continuous Testing Reviews
Overall Review Sentiment for Smartbear Continuous Testing
Log in to view review sentiment.
CucumberStudio excels in enabling seamless collaboration between technical and non-technical teams through Behavior-Driven Development (BDD). The user-friendly interface makes creating, visualizing, and maintaining Gherkin scenarios easy. Integrating tools like Jira, GitHub, and test automation frameworks ensures that the requirements and test cases are always aligned with the codebase. I particularly appreciate the real-time editing feature, allowing multiple team members to work together and ensure consistency across test cases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The performance can be a bit sluggish at times, especially with larger projects. I also feel that the reporting capabilities could be more detailed and customizable. Sometimes, integrating with external automation frameworks requires a bit more manual configuration than expected. Customer support is also not much prompt. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Matt E. Matt E."
With Zephyr I can create tests right inside Jenkins that leverage labels and components and release cycles. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I find creating steps to be an awful editing experience. I tend to write tests in the ticket description instead just so I can avoid the cumbersome work of filling out steps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Rahul S. Rahul S."
Easy to use, time saving as well. As it allows to import the test cases through spreasheet. The query view provides the quick searching of test cases or other work item which make the task smooth. Test case execution also is very quick and provides an option to attach the snapshot for each step or whole test case as well along with the defect linking. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The only feature which is irritating is while executing the test case, it does not allow a user to update the multiple test step status with less effor. It require to update the status each step one by one. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
QAComplete provides a limited range of support forums where users are unable to gather feedback and research the product before making any decisions. Its poor to have access, to user experiences and insights to diving into problems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I find it less useful that QAComplete does not allow for filtering test cases based on the number of steps written per test. This feature makes managing and organizing test cases much more difficult. One potential drawback of QAComplete is its performance, which impacts the progress of the testing process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It makes it difficult for me to find and manage test cases with step counts, which consumes me a lot of time. This feature has been not helpful, in my day to day testing tasks. Has decreased my productivity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
QAComplete encounters performance issues when dealing with large scale development infrastructures. There are aspects where the support provided is lacking despite Smart Bears marketing efforts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Mohd R. Mohd R."
It gives best opinions on software and also we can compare the products side by side Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It should expand more and also should have shorcuts to use it in a simplied way Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Brandon B. Brandon B."
The interface and setup are easy.
Tests Run. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Loadninja interface is often slow and buggy
features and functionality are shown but grayed out or non-functional - support usually states that the features are now deprecated or in development
Price is very expensive since almost any test requires high-tier hardware at 4x testing hours
You cannot retain data, scripts, or test plans if you switch between on-demand and paid subscription -- Yep! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Pavitr A. Pavitr A."
What I like is the end to end solution provided by the QA complete team that is well versed in what they do Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The amount of time spent in understanding the application alone , I can be paralled with some manual testing in the meantime Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Nidhi G. Nidhi G."
Helps to deliver the high quality product
Easy to Review & Compare the test result
Easy to manage testing cycle Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Sometimes Response is slow
Filtering test cases result is not correct sometimes Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Flexibility
Accuracy
Guidance
Automation testing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I don't think so I have any disappointment with QA complete but if they provide on time call support then it would be better Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.