Best Load Testing Tools

Adam Crivello
AC
Researched and written by Adam Crivello

Load testing tools test software products, websites, and servers by adding load pressure and measuring the response. Development teams use this software tool as a part of a larger software testing regimen to verify developed products, websites, and servers can handle the various stresses of day-to-day use, as well as high-impact uses (e.g., holiday shopping, enterprise application use, etc.). Load testing tools work well with load balancing software, often being integrated to stress points of impact during testing and then managing those stresses as they occur.

To qualify for inclusion in the Load Testing Tools category, a product must:

Stress test software products, websites, and servers
Test extreme cases for software, website, and server use
Generate reports on strengths and weaknesses revealed during testing

Best Load Testing Tools At A Glance

Best for Small Businesses:
Best for Mid-Market:
Best for Enterprise:
Highest User Satisfaction:
Best Free Software:
Show LessShow More
Best for Enterprise:
Highest User Satisfaction:
Best Free Software:

G2 takes pride in showing unbiased reviews on user satisfaction in our ratings and reports. We do not allow paid placements in any of our ratings, rankings, or reports. Learn about our scoring methodologies.

No filters applied
56 Listings in Load Testing Tools Available
(2,084)4.5 out of 5
1st Easiest To Use in Load Testing Tools software
View top Consulting Services for BrowserStack
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Free
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale, and optimize testing. BrowserStack is used by teams and organizations of all sizes - whether te

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • QA Engineer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 45% Small-Business
    • 37% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • BrowserStack Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    1,011
    Real Devices
    998
    Device Variety
    941
    Cross-Browser Testing
    600
    Browser Variety
    554
    Cons
    Expensive
    373
    Slow Performance
    365
    Slow Loading
    354
    Testing Difficulties
    353
    Slow Speed
    347
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • BrowserStack features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.7
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    7.7
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    8.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    8.4
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    2011
    HQ Location
    Dublin, Dublin
    Twitter
    @browserstack
    11,480 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1,395 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale, and optimize testing. BrowserStack is used by teams and organizations of all sizes - whether te

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • QA Engineer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 45% Small-Business
  • 37% Mid-Market
BrowserStack Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
1,011
Real Devices
998
Device Variety
941
Cross-Browser Testing
600
Browser Variety
554
Cons
Expensive
373
Slow Performance
365
Slow Loading
354
Testing Difficulties
353
Slow Speed
347
BrowserStack features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.7
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
7.7
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
8.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
8.4
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Company Website
Year Founded
2011
HQ Location
Dublin, Dublin
Twitter
@browserstack
11,480 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1,395 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Keysight Eggplant is a leading intelligent test automation platform that uses ML/AI to test the entire user journey — identifying and predicting any potential defects along the way. Unlike other te

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Test Automation Engineer
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 43% Enterprise
    • 35% Small-Business
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Keysight Eggplant Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    36
    Automation
    21
    Customer Support
    16
    Automation Support
    13
    Intuitive
    10
    Cons
    Limited Features
    8
    Missing Features
    8
    Functionality Issues
    6
    Poor Interface Design
    6
    Bug Issues
    5
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Keysight Eggplant features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.5
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    9.0
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    8.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    8.8
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2014
    HQ Location
    Santa Rosa, California, United States
    Twitter
    @Keysight
    13,608 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    12,235 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NYSE: KEYS
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Keysight Eggplant is a leading intelligent test automation platform that uses ML/AI to test the entire user journey — identifying and predicting any potential defects along the way. Unlike other te

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Test Automation Engineer
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 43% Enterprise
  • 35% Small-Business
Keysight Eggplant Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
36
Automation
21
Customer Support
16
Automation Support
13
Intuitive
10
Cons
Limited Features
8
Missing Features
8
Functionality Issues
6
Poor Interface Design
6
Bug Issues
5
Keysight Eggplant features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.5
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
9.0
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
8.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
8.8
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Year Founded
2014
HQ Location
Santa Rosa, California, United States
Twitter
@Keysight
13,608 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
12,235 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NYSE: KEYS

This is how G2 Deals can help you:

  • Easily shop for curated – and trusted – software
  • Own your own software buying journey
  • Discover exclusive deals on software
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    BlazeMeter, a comprehensive continuous testing platform that boosts your software delivery speed and quality, specializes in performance testing, functional UI testing, API testing and monitoring, alo

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 45% Mid-Market
    • 41% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    3
    API Management
    2
    API Testing
    2
    Integrations
    2
    Performance Efficiency
    2
    Cons
    Poor Recording Features
    2
    Bugs
    1
    Data Limitations
    1
    Expensive
    1
    Export Issues
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.3
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    8.3
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    8.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    8.2
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Perforce
    Year Founded
    1995
    HQ Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Twitter
    @perforce
    5,211 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1,551 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

BlazeMeter, a comprehensive continuous testing platform that boosts your software delivery speed and quality, specializes in performance testing, functional UI testing, API testing and monitoring, alo

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 45% Mid-Market
  • 41% Enterprise
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
3
API Management
2
API Testing
2
Integrations
2
Performance Efficiency
2
Cons
Poor Recording Features
2
Bugs
1
Data Limitations
1
Expensive
1
Export Issues
1
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.3
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
8.3
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
8.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
8.2
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Perforce
Year Founded
1995
HQ Location
Minneapolis, MN
Twitter
@perforce
5,211 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1,551 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    CloudTest provides a comprehensive performance platform for quickly validating and optimizing web and mobile user experience.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 37% Small-Business
    • 32% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Akamai CloudTest Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    6
    Performance
    5
    Cloud Compatibility
    3
    Mobile Testing
    3
    Performance Optimization
    3
    Cons
    Limited Customization
    4
    Expensive
    3
    Limited Features
    2
    Poor Documentation
    2
    Configuration Issues
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Akamai CloudTest features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    0.0
    No information available
    0.0
    No information available
    8.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    0.0
    No information available
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    1998
    HQ Location
    Cambridge, MA
    Twitter
    @Akamai
    119,748 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    10,409 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ:AKAM
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

CloudTest provides a comprehensive performance platform for quickly validating and optimizing web and mobile user experience.

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 37% Small-Business
  • 32% Mid-Market
Akamai CloudTest Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
6
Performance
5
Cloud Compatibility
3
Mobile Testing
3
Performance Optimization
3
Cons
Limited Customization
4
Expensive
3
Limited Features
2
Poor Documentation
2
Configuration Issues
1
Akamai CloudTest features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
0.0
No information available
0.0
No information available
8.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
0.0
No information available
Seller Details
Year Founded
1998
HQ Location
Cambridge, MA
Twitter
@Akamai
119,748 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
10,409 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ:AKAM
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Simple, smart, and scalable cloud-based load and performance testing for web and mobile apps.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 50% Enterprise
    • 21% Small-Business
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Automation
    1
    Ease of Use
    1
    Easy Access
    1
    Easy Integrations
    1
    Efficiency
    1
    Cons
    Functionality Issues
    1
    GUI Improvements
    1
    Poor Customer Support
    1
    Poor Interface
    1
    Poor UI
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • OpenText LoadRunner Cloud features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.4
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    9.3
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    9.3
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    9.4
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    OpenText
    Year Founded
    1991
    HQ Location
    Waterloo, ON
    Twitter
    @OpenText
    21,932 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    22,114 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ:OTEX
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Simple, smart, and scalable cloud-based load and performance testing for web and mobile apps.

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 50% Enterprise
  • 21% Small-Business
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Automation
1
Ease of Use
1
Easy Access
1
Easy Integrations
1
Efficiency
1
Cons
Functionality Issues
1
GUI Improvements
1
Poor Customer Support
1
Poor Interface
1
Poor UI
1
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.4
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
9.3
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
9.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
9.4
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
OpenText
Year Founded
1991
HQ Location
Waterloo, ON
Twitter
@OpenText
21,932 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
22,114 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ:OTEX
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Loader.io is a FREE load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps & apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 45% Mid-Market
    • 36% Small-Business
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Loader.io Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    4
    Load Testing
    4
    Easy Integrations
    3
    Performance
    3
    Accuracy of Results
    2
    Cons
    GUI Improvements
    3
    Poor Interface
    3
    Poor UI
    3
    Lack of Mobile Support
    1
    Testing Limitations
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Loader.io features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.8
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    8.9
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    9.4
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    8.3
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Twilio
    Year Founded
    2008
    HQ Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Twitter
    @twilio
    82,194 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    6,348 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NYSE: TWLO
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Loader.io is a FREE load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps & apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 45% Mid-Market
  • 36% Small-Business
Loader.io Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
4
Load Testing
4
Easy Integrations
3
Performance
3
Accuracy of Results
2
Cons
GUI Improvements
3
Poor Interface
3
Poor UI
3
Lack of Mobile Support
1
Testing Limitations
1
Loader.io features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.8
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
8.9
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
9.4
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
8.3
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Twilio
Year Founded
2008
HQ Location
San Francisco, CA
Twitter
@twilio
82,194 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
6,348 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NYSE: TWLO
(115)4.5 out of 5
2nd Easiest To Use in Load Testing Tools software
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:$199.00
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    loadview-testing.com LoadView by Dotcom-Monitor is for DevOps teams and performance testing engineers looking to load test websites, web applications, APIs, and streaming media with hundreds to thous

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 62% Small-Business
    • 27% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • LoadView Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    31
    Load Testing
    30
    Accuracy of Results
    11
    Performance Efficiency
    7
    Browser Testing
    6
    Cons
    Poor UI
    3
    Testing Limitations
    3
    Expensive
    2
    Limited Access
    2
    Limited Free Access
    2
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • LoadView features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.7
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    9.1
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    8.9
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    9.0
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    1998
    HQ Location
    Spring Park, MN
    Twitter
    @Dotcom_Monitor
    1,581 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    19 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

loadview-testing.com LoadView by Dotcom-Monitor is for DevOps teams and performance testing engineers looking to load test websites, web applications, APIs, and streaming media with hundreds to thous

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 62% Small-Business
  • 27% Mid-Market
LoadView Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
31
Load Testing
30
Accuracy of Results
11
Performance Efficiency
7
Browser Testing
6
Cons
Poor UI
3
Testing Limitations
3
Expensive
2
Limited Access
2
Limited Free Access
2
LoadView features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.7
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
9.1
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
8.9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
9.0
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Year Founded
1998
HQ Location
Spring Park, MN
Twitter
@Dotcom_Monitor
1,581 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
19 employees on LinkedIn®
(140)4.5 out of 5
5th Easiest To Use in Load Testing Tools software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    SoapUI is the world's most trusted open source API testing tool

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Consultant
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 44% Enterprise
    • 44% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • SOAPUI Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    6
    Testing
    6
    Automation
    4
    Customer Support
    4
    Functionality
    4
    Cons
    Complexity
    3
    Slow Performance
    2
    Slow Speed
    2
    Difficult Learning
    1
    Difficult Setup
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • SOAPUI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.9
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    8.6
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    8.9
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    8.5
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    SmartBear
    HQ Location
    Somerville, MA
    Twitter
    @smartbear
    16,971 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    924 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

SoapUI is the world's most trusted open source API testing tool

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Consultant
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 44% Enterprise
  • 44% Mid-Market
SOAPUI Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
6
Testing
6
Automation
4
Customer Support
4
Functionality
4
Cons
Complexity
3
Slow Performance
2
Slow Speed
2
Difficult Learning
1
Difficult Setup
1
SOAPUI features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.9
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
8.6
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
8.9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
8.5
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
SmartBear
HQ Location
Somerville, MA
Twitter
@smartbear
16,971 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
924 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Micro Focus Silk Performer (formerly Borland Silk Performer) is designed to deliver a consistent user experience anytime, anywhere, and on any device.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Banking
    Market Segment
    • 54% Enterprise
    • 36% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • OpenText Silk Performer features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.4
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    10.0
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    8.5
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    10.0
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    OpenText
    Year Founded
    1991
    HQ Location
    Waterloo, ON
    Twitter
    @OpenText
    21,943 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    22,114 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ:OTEX
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Micro Focus Silk Performer (formerly Borland Silk Performer) is designed to deliver a consistent user experience anytime, anywhere, and on any device.

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Banking
Market Segment
  • 54% Enterprise
  • 36% Mid-Market
OpenText Silk Performer features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.4
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
10.0
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
8.5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
10.0
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
OpenText
Year Founded
1991
HQ Location
Waterloo, ON
Twitter
@OpenText
21,943 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
22,114 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ:OTEX
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Tricentis NeoLoad provides best-in-class performance testing capabilities to enable highly scalable business applications that will delight end users and exceed their expectations. NeoLoad simulates e

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 41% Enterprise
    • 36% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Tricentis Neoload Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    5
    Testing Capabilities
    4
    Capabilities
    2
    Collaboration
    2
    Functionality
    2
    Cons
    Expensive
    2
    Complexity
    1
    Difficulty
    1
    Error Handling
    1
    Integration Issues
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Tricentis Neoload features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.0
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    9.5
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    10.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    9.4
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Tricentis
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    2007
    HQ Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Twitter
    @Tricentis
    12,757 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1,530 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Tricentis NeoLoad provides best-in-class performance testing capabilities to enable highly scalable business applications that will delight end users and exceed their expectations. NeoLoad simulates e

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 41% Enterprise
  • 36% Mid-Market
Tricentis Neoload Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
5
Testing Capabilities
4
Capabilities
2
Collaboration
2
Functionality
2
Cons
Expensive
2
Complexity
1
Difficulty
1
Error Handling
1
Integration Issues
1
Tricentis Neoload features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
9.5
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
10.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
9.4
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
Tricentis
Company Website
Year Founded
2007
HQ Location
Vienna, Austria
Twitter
@Tricentis
12,757 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1,530 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    LoadRunner is the industry-standard software solution for application performance and load testing. LoadRunner emulates hundreds or thousands of concurrent virtual users, with minimal hardware, to app

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 78% Enterprise
    • 15% Mid-Market
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • OpenText LoadRunner Professional features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.4
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    8.3
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    7.8
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    9.3
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    OpenText
    Year Founded
    1991
    HQ Location
    Waterloo, ON
    Twitter
    @OpenText
    21,943 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    22,114 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ:OTEX
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

LoadRunner is the industry-standard software solution for application performance and load testing. LoadRunner emulates hundreds or thousands of concurrent virtual users, with minimal hardware, to app

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 78% Enterprise
  • 15% Mid-Market
OpenText LoadRunner Professional features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.4
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
8.3
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
7.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
9.3
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
OpenText
Year Founded
1991
HQ Location
Waterloo, ON
Twitter
@OpenText
21,943 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
22,114 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ:OTEX
(156)4.3 out of 5
6th Easiest To Use in Load Testing Tools software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Apache JMeter desktop application is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance.

    Users
    • Software Engineer
    • Senior Software Engineer
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 40% Enterprise
    • 39% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Apache JMeter Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    6
    Load Testing
    6
    Capabilities
    3
    Cost-Effective
    3
    Customer Support
    3
    Cons
    Performance Issues
    3
    Slow Performance
    3
    Complexity
    2
    Insufficient Information
    2
    Poor Documentation
    2
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Apache JMeter features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.4
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    9.1
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    8.3
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    8.5
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    1999
    HQ Location
    Wakefield, MA
    Twitter
    @TheASF
    66,228 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    2,291 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Apache JMeter desktop application is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance.

Users
  • Software Engineer
  • Senior Software Engineer
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 40% Enterprise
  • 39% Mid-Market
Apache JMeter Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
6
Load Testing
6
Capabilities
3
Cost-Effective
3
Customer Support
3
Cons
Performance Issues
3
Slow Performance
3
Complexity
2
Insufficient Information
2
Poor Documentation
2
Apache JMeter features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.4
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
9.1
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
8.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
8.5
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Year Founded
1999
HQ Location
Wakefield, MA
Twitter
@TheASF
66,228 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
2,291 employees on LinkedIn®
By PFLB
(38)4.8 out of 5
Save to My Lists
Entry Level Price:Free
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    PFLB is an AI-powered load testing platform designed to help teams confidently scale their websites and applications. With PFLB, you can effortlessly simulate massive traffic, replicating real-world c

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 68% Small-Business
    • 21% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • PFLB Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    18
    Load Testing
    17
    Helpful
    14
    Automation
    13
    Efficiency Improvement
    13
    Cons
    Expensive
    13
    Learning Curve
    11
    Pricing Issues
    10
    Difficult Learning Curve
    8
    Complexity
    6
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • PFLB features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.2
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    9.4
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    9.6
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    9.4
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    PFLB
    Year Founded
    2022
    HQ Location
    Mountain View, US
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    11 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

PFLB is an AI-powered load testing platform designed to help teams confidently scale their websites and applications. With PFLB, you can effortlessly simulate massive traffic, replicating real-world c

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 68% Small-Business
  • 21% Enterprise
PFLB Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
18
Load Testing
17
Helpful
14
Automation
13
Efficiency Improvement
13
Cons
Expensive
13
Learning Curve
11
Pricing Issues
10
Difficult Learning Curve
8
Complexity
6
PFLB features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.2
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
9.4
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
9.6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
9.4
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
PFLB
Year Founded
2022
HQ Location
Mountain View, US
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
11 employees on LinkedIn®
By k6
(31)4.8 out of 5
View top Consulting Services for k6
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    k6 is an open-source tool and cloud service that makes load testing easy for developers, operations, and QA engineers. We help software teams improve the testing process so that they consistently deli

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer Software
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 65% Mid-Market
    • 26% Enterprise
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • k6 features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.2
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    9.5
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    9.3
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    8.6
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    k6
    Year Founded
    2009
    HQ Location
    Stockholm
    Twitter
    @schuran
    284 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    43 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

k6 is an open-source tool and cloud service that makes load testing easy for developers, operations, and QA engineers. We help software teams improve the testing process so that they consistently deli

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer Software
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 65% Mid-Market
  • 26% Enterprise
k6 features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.2
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
9.5
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
9.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
8.6
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Seller
k6
Year Founded
2009
HQ Location
Stockholm
Twitter
@schuran
284 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
43 employees on LinkedIn®
(31)4.5 out of 5
3rd Easiest To Use in Load Testing Tools software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    WebLOAD is a performance and load testing solution designed to test the most challenging web environments. Combining recording with the flexibility of JavaScript and a powerful correlation engine, Web

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer Software
    Market Segment
    • 52% Enterprise
    • 32% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • WebLOAD Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Load Testing
    4
    Automation
    3
    Customer Satisfaction
    3
    Customer Support
    3
    Ease of Use
    3
    Cons
    Insufficient Information
    2
    Poor Documentation
    2
    Limited Customization
    1
    Testing Issues
    1
    Testing Limitations
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • WebLOAD features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.4
    Extreme Cases
    Average: 8.1
    9.1
    Stress Testing
    Average: 8.7
    9.0
    Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
    Average: 8.8
    9.4
    Test Variety
    Average: 8.5
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    1993
    HQ Location
    Bridgewater, NJ
    Twitter
    @RadViewSoftware
    96 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    31 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    OTC: RDVWF
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

WebLOAD is a performance and load testing solution designed to test the most challenging web environments. Combining recording with the flexibility of JavaScript and a powerful correlation engine, Web

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer Software
Market Segment
  • 52% Enterprise
  • 32% Mid-Market
WebLOAD Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Load Testing
4
Automation
3
Customer Satisfaction
3
Customer Support
3
Ease of Use
3
Cons
Insufficient Information
2
Poor Documentation
2
Limited Customization
1
Testing Issues
1
Testing Limitations
1
WebLOAD features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.4
Extreme Cases
Average: 8.1
9.1
Stress Testing
Average: 8.7
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.8
9.4
Test Variety
Average: 8.5
Seller Details
Year Founded
1993
HQ Location
Bridgewater, NJ
Twitter
@RadViewSoftware
96 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
31 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
OTC: RDVWF