Buffer Reviews & Product Details - Page 19

Simple UI, very easy to use and introduce new team members to Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hard to find anything that I dislike about Buffer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This software has a great free version for people getting started with their social media strategy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have not found anything that I dislike as of yet. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Buffer to schedule content publications in the social networks of our organization, I have been able to efficiently control our active accounts and keep them always up to date, through a software that does not represent any complication, its interface is pleasant, it is extremely easy to use and its functionalities and analytics are excellent references to know how we are doing day after day. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Only that the mobile version does not have all the features that the web version has, however I think it is normal, as in many applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Integration with almost all available social media platforms. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pricing is not convenient as per my experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Buffer is a great package of social media management tools that rocks a great design and is very consistent with it's support and improvements over time. It also helps a lot that it's cheaper compared to other competitors in some ways. The price gives it a competitive advantage if you're pitching an acquisition of an SMM platform to companies that aren't willing to spend a lot on their digital marketing activities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It lacks some conveinent features that the competitors offer. I'm talking about features like integrated tagging for Twitter and LinkedIn. Last time I used this software it still lacked the proper tagging features which requires you to make an extra step to open a separate tab to check whether you got the username right or wrong.

Another aspect I dislike is that Buffer's middle range plan is intended for two users only. In my opinion, the mid range option should be for at least three people. At the time of choosing, we decided to go with Hootsuite because it's mid-range plan, while more expensive, was intended for three people and also offered more of the above-mentioned features. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is easy to plan and schedule social posts for different platforms all in one place. It also considers character counts Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tagging on LinkedIn does not work. You have to manually tag after a post is made. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the ability to set specific time slots and create posts to add to the queue easily. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Adding components, users, accounts, et al starts to get expensive quickly. Features-wise, however, nothing to speak of that's not user friendly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Prescheduled posts and organization, layout to determine upcoming posts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Constant requirement for upgrades that cost significant amount. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's easy to schedule your social post with this. It's swift and very helpful for small business owners like me. Buffer makes it easier to carry out our tasks in a very straightforward and simple way. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Buffer can't help you reply comments on social post, you'll have to do that yourself. It's sad Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.