BrowserStack Reviews & Product Details - Page 4

BrowerStack allow us to use app live in various phone and devices.

In a single click we can test our app, website in differenct phones and different browsers.

It allows to test out app in all devices without infrastructure.

It has a special support for appium and automation testing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't feel there is any negative point in the browserstack, but once we close the session we can't access the device logs

Free session is only for 2 minutes Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

BrowserStack is easy to use and the implementation was smooth. The customer support is always responsive and helpful.I use it frequently for cross-browser testing on real devices, and its wide range of feature to makes it an essential tool for QA process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It can be slow many times when multiple tests are run and many a times when I conduct cross browser testing on device the connection is lost.

Pricing is high for small team so it will be difficult to use the platform full functionality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

App Live -covers a great variety of Phones models and OS version

-when new OS version & Device are launched the devices are available very quick.

App Automation - Give us option to use parallel threads so helps save lot of time .

- Gives us option to manage the licenses internally with less dependencies on others.

-Ease of intergation is easy for automation with SDK support for all major framework

Customer support is good able to share relevant links which can be used to understand feature .

Ease of implementaion becomes eaiser since lot of support links and information is available.

Frequency of use -used for every nightly builds or daily builds while doing integration testing . Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1.In Reports -Test reports are not able to download or shared to stakeholders .

2.Sometimes due to proxies set on office system the automation scripts are not working fine.

3.Report customisation is difficult to do with option not that properly aligned . Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We get best reporting and analytics of our automated test run under App Automate. We can integrate reporting of daily run with slack and other notification tools for better monitoring of our test cases and products.

Apart from the App Automate, we have Automate feature here only to automate our web UI cases more perfectly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I do not have any dislike about BrowserStack in the features which I am using. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

BrowserStack is great for device related testing, and we are using it for mobile apps. Since we manage content in AEM CMS, we use BrowserStack to review the changes efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main issue is that it can be challenging for beginners to navigate and get started. The user interface should be more straightforward and intuitive for first time users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We have set up a daily executions for the AccessibilityTesting, where in we are getting reports for our web pages and how they are accessible in the internet to the user.Along with the daily execution we run this test after every new deployments to test the impact on our application.

Apart from the automation of Accessibilty testing here we can manually run and check for any web page or url. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am quite happy with the Accessibility testing performance and feature of browserstack. Although, they can add more devices for the sceen reader launcher. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Integration of automated cases does not require any sort of changes in the existing written code.

It supports parallel runs which saves a lot of time in executing automated suite.

We can update the status of Automated Executed test manually as well in case their is discrepancy in test result. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Execution of parallel tests can be improved.

Session dashboard can be improved with keeping test suites in a track. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best platform used for testing apps. I use it every day. It has a lot of real devices to use and many useful options. You can decide whether to use your network or if you want to geolocate yourself in another state. You can use the devtools panel to monitor logs and requests and much more. Installing an app is very simple, you can use the software or the apk/ipa directly. To try! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

To view requests on the network, the app needs to restart Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

App live, web live, and work smoothly. Apple products are good in response.

Good response at a time when the device works smoothly.

The network speed for every device is good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

After the IPA file upload user is not able to use settings in the app side.

Some apps required to change app settings from phone settings.

Setting option not able to be used.

In automation every time required to upload a new file so there is no way to find out one file or link from the code They download the file and install it in the app the app code is not required to change the BS file.

Also, some apps are more than 100MB, so the Browser stack hangs for some time and responds. They are required to reload the webpage or change the device.

Most importantly every time iPad was not able to access due to unavailability.

Screen rotation does not work very time correctly, they some time different work e.g. landscape mode all app shows vertically.

Every time need to select a new device , as per user point if I use previous one device so please shows first used device and shows all device e.g. used device list and all device list.

And user was working on previous device so they start from there not from new user device . Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For the most part, the range of products available and the ease-of-use in the platform in which you can carry those operations out is good. It's clear that Browserstack is a front-runner in the QA industry because they continue to re-invent and invest in new technologies to bring teams forward. Having one software to access multiple tools is rare and is something Browserstack do well.

Easy to integrate! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pricing options are not the most flexible and tend to cater to bigger organisations, costs in general are high as well. Clarity over the pricing of new tools like test management, observability before investing in trying out the Beta would be better.

I regret purchasing Test Observability so early on it's development phase as there's still many flaws, while they have good response rates from their support engineers, they haven't been able to resolve any issues after 6-9 months of investigation.

The stability of running tests in Browserstacks cloud environment can be poorer than running in a local environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.