Lors de l'évaluation des deux solutions, les examinateurs ont trouvé CharityTracker plus facile à utiliser, à configurer et à administrer. Les examinateurs ont également préféré faire des affaires avec CharityTracker dans l'ensemble.
The ability to create external portals for our clients. Having them complete their paperwork and save it directly to their folders is a time saver.
We are a small nonprofit and used Apricot for several years. It’s effective, but expensive for what you get. We had a minor billing dispute which we had a hard time resolving. We did not renew our contract and Apricot kept billing us. Next thing we had...
CharityTracker est extrêmement convivial et le support client est inégalé.
It constantly logs you out while in the middle of inputting information to HMIS.
The ability to create external portals for our clients. Having them complete their paperwork and save it directly to their folders is a time saver.
CharityTracker est extrêmement convivial et le support client est inégalé.
We are a small nonprofit and used Apricot for several years. It’s effective, but expensive for what you get. We had a minor billing dispute which we had a hard time resolving. We did not renew our contract and Apricot kept billing us. Next thing we had...
It constantly logs you out while in the middle of inputting information to HMIS.