Compare Strike Graph and Vanta 
- Users report that Vanta excels in Quality of Support with a score of 9.1, while Strike Graph shines even brighter with a score of 9.6, indicating that users find Strike Graph's support team more responsive and helpful.
- Reviewers mention that Vanta's Compliance Monitoring feature is robust, scoring 9.5, which is higher than Strike Graph's 9.1. This suggests that Vanta may provide more comprehensive tools for ensuring compliance.
- G2 users highlight that Vanta's Data Security score of 9.1 is superior to Strike Graph's 8.8, indicating that Vanta may offer stronger security measures to protect sensitive information.
- Users on G2 report that Strike Graph's Scoring feature for risk assessment is particularly strong, with a score of 9.1 compared to Vanta's 8.6, suggesting that users find Strike Graph's risk evaluation tools more effective.
- Reviewers mention that Vanta's Audit Trail feature scores 8.8, while Strike Graph's is rated higher at 9.0, indicating that users appreciate the thoroughness of Strike Graph's audit management capabilities.
- Users say that Vanta's SSO (Single Sign-On) feature scores 9.0, which is significantly better than Strike Graph's 7.7, suggesting that Vanta provides a more seamless user experience for managing access.
- Unlimited users
- Resources and Policy Templates
- Strike Graph Control Library
Sample control wordings were well thought out and easy to work with. The security questionnaire AI functionality has worked really well so far and saves our team a lot of time when responding to clients. The platform is stable and easy to use.
It's extremely priced for a database of documents. There are no examples or templates that could speed up the process, making the tool probably not exactly useful.
A clear and concise list of tests that need to be fixed, and how to remediate
Vanta is only really useful as a utility towards ISO 27001 compliance - it lacks fundamental aspects of the standard for it to be the sole tool to achieve an ISO 27001 certification. Really fundamental and mandatory parts of the standard are lacking, such...
Sample control wordings were well thought out and easy to work with. The security questionnaire AI functionality has worked really well so far and saves our team a lot of time when responding to clients. The platform is stable and easy to use.
A clear and concise list of tests that need to be fixed, and how to remediate
It's extremely priced for a database of documents. There are no examples or templates that could speed up the process, making the tool probably not exactly useful.
Vanta is only really useful as a utility towards ISO 27001 compliance - it lacks fundamental aspects of the standard for it to be the sole tool to achieve an ISO 27001 certification. Really fundamental and mandatory parts of the standard are lacking, such...
