Compare SpiraTest and TestRail 
- Users report that SpiraTest excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 8.8, which allows for efficient organization and management of test cases. In contrast, TestRail, while slightly higher at 8.9, has been noted by reviewers to have a more intuitive interface for navigating test cases.
- Reviewers mention that SpiraTest's Quality of Support is a strong point, with a score of 8.8, indicating that users feel well-supported. TestRail, with a score of 8.4, has received feedback suggesting that while support is adequate, it may not be as responsive as SpiraTest's.
- G2 users highlight SpiraTest's superior Automated Creation & Testing capabilities, scoring 9.4, which allows teams to streamline their testing processes. TestRail, while offering automation features, does not match this level of functionality, leading some users to feel that it lacks depth in this area.
- Users on G2 report that SpiraTest's Centralized Information feature is highly effective, scoring 9.5, which helps teams maintain a single source of truth for their testing efforts. TestRail, while scoring well, does not provide the same level of integration, leading to some challenges in information accessibility.
- Reviewers say that SpiraTest's Traceability feature, with a score of 8.6, is robust, allowing for clear tracking of requirements to test cases. TestRail's score of 8.6 is comparable, but users have mentioned that the implementation can be less straightforward.
- Users report that SpiraTest's Analytics capabilities are impressive, scoring 9.2, providing deep insights into testing performance. TestRail, while offering analytics, has been noted by reviewers to be less comprehensive, which can limit the ability to derive actionable insights.
- Unlimited support for 1 year from date of purchase;
- Includes the software, hosting and support.
- 100% money back guarantee;
- No IT required, get started in minutes
- Automated updates & optimizations
- Secure hosting on super-fast servers
The value for money and the quality of the product that we are getting goes way beyond our expectations. also it integrates easily with Jira so it really assists in test management and bug tracking. maintenance and user support is easy they typically...
UI can be very cluttered at times, and navigation is not always intuitive
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
The value for money and the quality of the product that we are getting goes way beyond our expectations. also it integrates easily with Jira so it really assists in test management and bug tracking. maintenance and user support is easy they typically...
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
UI can be very cluttered at times, and navigation is not always intuitive
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
