Compare Skaled and Winning by Design 
- Users report that Winning by Design excels in quality of work with a score of 9.7, while Skaled, although strong, has a slightly lower score of 9.1. Reviewers mention that the thoroughness and attention to detail in Winning by Design's deliverables set them apart.
- Reviewers say that the responsiveness of Winning by Design is rated at 9.7, indicating a high level of customer service, whereas Skaled's score of 9.4 suggests room for improvement. Users on G2 appreciate the quick turnaround times and proactive communication from Winning by Design.
- G2 users highlight that Winning by Design's team expertise is rated at 9.8, showcasing their deep knowledge in the field, while Skaled's score of 9.3 indicates a competent team but with less specialized knowledge. Reviewers mention that the expertise of Winning by Design's consultants significantly enhances project outcomes.
- Users say that Winning by Design's planning capabilities, particularly in needs assessment and resource allocation, are superior with scores of 9.4 and 9.3 respectively. In contrast, Skaled's scores of 9.1 in both areas suggest they may not be as thorough in understanding client needs. Reviewers mention that Winning by Design's structured approach leads to better project alignment.
- Reviewers mention that the technical expertise of Winning by Design is rated at 9.5, which is higher than Skaled's 9.1. Users report that Winning by Design's team is adept at navigating complex technical challenges, which is a significant advantage for clients with intricate requirements.
- Users on G2 report that Winning by Design's training and go-live support are rated at 9.7 and 9.6 respectively, indicating a strong commitment to client onboarding. Skaled's support scores are lower, suggesting that users may not feel as well-prepared post-implementation. Reviewers say that the comprehensive training provided by Winning by Design leads to smoother transitions and better user adoption.
Skaled team was an extension of our team - they were hands-on, thoughtful and committed to driving results and success.
My least favorite parts were the final "Science of the Close" presentations. While the Pandell audience was much broader than just our sales team, I felt that the content was generic and not specific to Pandell's needs. Specifically, as a sales...
The format and the content focused on SaaS sales. Usually in sales trainings, you get two full 8 hour days of training and then the content is forgotten two days after the training is over. WBD takes a more effective approach: splitting up the sessions...
The Account Executive team that I was on was trained by Jacco, while Dan trained the SDR's--I'm told the AE's actually got off easy and don't understand why the teams were actually split up as the training was equally elementary for all. There were no...
Skaled team was an extension of our team - they were hands-on, thoughtful and committed to driving results and success.
The format and the content focused on SaaS sales. Usually in sales trainings, you get two full 8 hour days of training and then the content is forgotten two days after the training is over. WBD takes a more effective approach: splitting up the sessions...
My least favorite parts were the final "Science of the Close" presentations. While the Pandell audience was much broader than just our sales team, I felt that the content was generic and not specific to Pandell's needs. Specifically, as a sales...
The Account Executive team that I was on was trained by Jacco, while Dan trained the SDR's--I'm told the AE's actually got off easy and don't understand why the teams were actually split up as the training was equally elementary for all. There were no...
