When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found IBM Targetprocess easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with IBM Targetprocess overall.
Reviewers felt that IBM Targetprocess meets the needs of their business better than Planview Portfolios.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that IBM Targetprocess is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of IBM Targetprocess over Planview Portfolios.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Targetprocess
No pricing available
Planview Portfolios
No pricing available
Free Trial
IBM Targetprocess
Free Trial is available
Planview Portfolios
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
214
7.8
36
Ease of Use
7.9
228
7.2
37
Ease of Setup
7.4
106
6.3
18
Ease of Admin
7.8
100
7.1
16
Quality of Support
8.9
189
7.4
32
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
The two most recent versions of the following browsers are supported:
Google Chrome (recommended), Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari (not supported on Windows),...Read more
What are the limits of the free team pricing plan
1 Comment
Official Response from IBM Targetprocess
The team pricing plan in Targetprocess is totally free. You can have an unlimited number of active users, with a licensing price $0 per user / month. The...Read more
Is it possible to integrate Targetprocess and Slack?
1 Comment
Official Response from IBM Targetprocess
It is possible to get selected alerts from Targetprocess to Slack, and submit an entity to Targetprocess from your Slack directly. Each direction is...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.